Informational deceit often comes in the form of omission. Breitbart regularly refuses to even touch upon key news stories, particularly when that information is supportive of Trump, actual laws, and the will of the majority;
Likewise, when they do cover stories that cannot be logically ignored, their slant is to downplay any and all details pertaining to the scenario at hand. They write in generalities, rarely providing the meat of facts.
I want to slap their title editors. Just peruse them for a few days, and see if you can pick up on something about them.
Hoft has been staunchly supporting Trump for 5 years. He's got a tiny staff and a massive task.
At least he's willing to make public topics not one other outlet will touch.
Cool, but 50% of what Hoft and GP is doing is directly harmful to Trump and good for business in a very short term.
If Brietbart isn’t covering it, stand back because it’s WEAKLY sourced.
Breitbart has become a ghost of its former self. Andrew would puke if he were still breathing.
On what grounds? What about Breitbart has changed so much for you?
Alas, let me count the ways...
Informational deceit often comes in the form of omission. Breitbart regularly refuses to even touch upon key news stories, particularly when that information is supportive of Trump, actual laws, and the will of the majority;
Likewise, when they do cover stories that cannot be logically ignored, their slant is to downplay any and all details pertaining to the scenario at hand. They write in generalities, rarely providing the meat of facts.
I want to slap their title editors. Just peruse them for a few days, and see if you can pick up on something about them.