seems that way but again it's a bit of an echo chamber here (by design)...I haven't wandered into a lefty site and seen any mention of fraud, then again they think they won so I'm guessing they aren't interested in talking about fraud.
This is one of the main hallmarks of fraud. When you see legitimate mistakes, they should occur in relatively random directions, meaning some of these glitches should benefit Trump, some Biden. But when all the mistakes are large and only benefit one party, they aren't mistakes, they are fraud. Tax attorneys get people in front of judges all the time for this kind of thing. Let's hope the courts are consistent with election fraud.
"Conclusion: This is very strong evidence that the absentee voting counts in Michigan have been manipulated by a computer algorithm.
On the surface, it would seem that the tabulating equipment in each precinct has been programmed to shift a percentage of absentee votes from Trump to Biden. A simple hand- count of absentee ballots from a sampling of precincts should be sufficient to determine whether this assertion is valid; forensic analysis of the tabulating equipment would be required for definitive proof."
Shouldn't a recount identify a huge discrepancy in votes if an electronic switch occurred? The paper would not align with the altered tabulation, right? What is going on?
OK, but this theory relies on the thought that an algorithm notes the vote count and alters it by flipping votes during the counting. If there are paper ballots preserved, then those should differ from the electronic record of (altered) ballots, right?
The markers of fraud are f’ing everywhere. We don’t need “definitive proof” to know this election is invalid. They’ve built the systems to prevent forensic examinations from revealing enough. Statistical improbabilities in damn nearly every area benefiting one candidate again and again demonstrate a clear trend that people need to be willfully ignorant or corrupt to ignore.
has anyone heard of massive fraud that benefitted Trump with votes? I've only heard about Biden getting the freebie votes
That’s correct. Every “glitch” or problem that’s been identified with the election this year have all conveniently been in favor of Biden.
seems that way but again it's a bit of an echo chamber here (by design)...I haven't wandered into a lefty site and seen any mention of fraud, then again they think they won so I'm guessing they aren't interested in talking about fraud.
You won’t see it from the main stream media. They are still claiming there is no evidence — most secure election in history. Sure it is... sure.
Yeah.. thats the ticket.. no fraud at all
This is one of the main hallmarks of fraud. When you see legitimate mistakes, they should occur in relatively random directions, meaning some of these glitches should benefit Trump, some Biden. But when all the mistakes are large and only benefit one party, they aren't mistakes, they are fraud. Tax attorneys get people in front of judges all the time for this kind of thing. Let's hope the courts are consistent with election fraud.
But muh no evidence, reeeeee
"Conclusion: This is very strong evidence that the absentee voting counts in Michigan have been manipulated by a computer algorithm.
On the surface, it would seem that the tabulating equipment in each precinct has been programmed to shift a percentage of absentee votes from Trump to Biden. A simple hand- count of absentee ballots from a sampling of precincts should be sufficient to determine whether this assertion is valid; forensic analysis of the tabulating equipment would be required for definitive proof."
Now we need to demand a recount.
Shouldn't a recount identify a huge discrepancy in votes if an electronic switch occurred? The paper would not align with the altered tabulation, right? What is going on?
It's called stalling recounts and audits for weeks until you have time to fill in the paper trail.
Also muh USBs
Maybe initially, but they have had plenty of time to align the paper to the votes. Have you seen the shredding trucks in GA?
So you think they are manufacturing ballots to suit the Dominion flip?
Always has been.
Many of the machines print a paper receipt that may or may not include the vote selected on the screen
OK, but this theory relies on the thought that an algorithm notes the vote count and alters it by flipping votes during the counting. If there are paper ballots preserved, then those should differ from the electronic record of (altered) ballots, right?
That is a possibility. Other possibility is the machine itself simply credits Biden instead and prints its own receipt
Order from chaos.
Paging Dr Shiva!
The markers of fraud are f’ing everywhere. We don’t need “definitive proof” to know this election is invalid. They’ve built the systems to prevent forensic examinations from revealing enough. Statistical improbabilities in damn nearly every area benefiting one candidate again and again demonstrate a clear trend that people need to be willfully ignorant or corrupt to ignore.