368
posted ago by Sdollar456 +369 / -1

Hear me out Pedes, this is important! Remember how we felt leading up to this interview on Faux news this morning? We felt confident that our cases would get to the SCOTUS. We knew that, thankfully, the old hag croaked and was replaced by ACB. From there, we would receive fair trials that would likely be in our favor 5-4. All good so far? Well, most of us have had the wind stripped from our sails this morning, but don’t be beat yet!

I don’t know what GEOTUS is up to, but, remember, there are no coincidences.

Have y’all ever heard about “the rule of 4”? It takes 4 justices on SCOTUS to decide to hear a case in order for that case to be heard by the entire SCOTUS.

If we are expecting a 5-4 decision in our favor, than “the rule of 4” should be in our favor too. Hold on guys and gals, I know it’s rough, but we’re in this together!

Hear me out Pedes, this is important! Remember how we felt leading up to this interview on Faux news this morning? We felt confident that our cases would get to the SCOTUS. We knew that, thankfully, the old hag croaked and was replaced by ACB. From there, we would receive fair trials that would likely be in our favor 5-4. All good so far? Well, most of us have had the wind stripped from our sails this morning, but don’t be beat yet! I don’t know what GEOTUS is up to, but, remember, there are no coincidences. Have y’all ever heard about “the rule of 4”? It takes 4 justices on SCOTUS to decide to hear a case in order for that case to be heard by the entire SCOTUS. If we are expecting a 5-4 decision in our favor, than “the rule of 4” should be in our favor too. Hold on guys and gals, I know it’s rough, but we’re in this together!
Comments (28)
sorted by:
30
RedCoast31 30 points ago +31 / -1

Here's the deal. You may feel discouraged, but it should spur ACTION.

The POTUS called us to march. We should be worried enough that only marching in the street, getting others to protest with you and holding your state legislatures feet to the fire will save you.

11
Sdollar456 [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

I agree 100%

7
altaG12 7 points ago +7 / -0

Totally agree, those living in PA, WI, GA, AZ, and MI need to call their state legislatures!! I'm in TX but left a message for the majority PA legislatures. If you can't march or attend a rally, call/email your representative. If you can do both, even better

17
KeKieChan 17 points ago +17 / -0

appear weak when you are strong

11
AndrewCuomosEmmy 11 points ago +11 / -0

Thanks for this pede, a lot of people here needed this after this morning. If we fight on, we might lose. If we surrender, we will lose. It's an easy choice.

10
trump2020voter 10 points ago +10 / -0

HOLD THE LINE, PATRIOTS!! 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

6
ciemPepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

BE THE LINE! EXTEND THE LINE! 125%

8
thesas 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thanks good to help us stay positive

7
Cincinattus1776 7 points ago +7 / -0

Trump's got three appointees on the court, as well as one of the most conservative members on the court. That's 4. Alito is a Bush appointee but he ruled against his fellow Bush appointee in last week's SCOTUS decision, and Pennsylvania snubbed him twice in his SCOTUS orders after the election.

5
Sdollar456 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Excellent points Pede. I, for one, feel extremely thankful for what our side has in its tool bag. Truth-be-told, I would rather be in our position than theirs.

6
EaglesFanInPhx 6 points ago +6 / -0

What were his comments on Faux concerning the Supreme Court for those of us who missed it?

9
Sdollar456 [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

He said it would be difficult to reach SCOTUS. In general, the whole interview gave the impression that Trump was barely hanging on.

2
RallyinStJohnsWood 2 points ago +3 / -1

the whole interview gave the impression that Trump was barely hanging on. playing possum, and laying low

Maria B: "Are you worried about riots if the SC agrees with you ?"

GEOTUS: "the people that we have, and the people that are so committed to this  (like I've never seen, I think they have more spirit than even before the election),  all of the people,  these are not rioting types. They are stronger, they are smarter, they are more successful. "

IOW: "The militia, by definition, does not riot. They stop riots".

3
bf4truth 3 points ago +3 / -0

yeah I missed it too

5
CincyJoe 5 points ago +6 / -1

He knows what is coming. This is a total act he's putting on in my opinion...

2
Sdollar456 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Completely speculative: but it might be a strategy to quell civil unrest on the side of the looney leftist.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
Sdollar456 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t think any of our cases have even been through the discovery process yet. I’ve been involved with a handful of lawsuits, but I’m really a layperson when it comes to procedures. Maybe there is a lawyer-pede here that could help us out with the deets

4
DrainNIH 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can you give a TLDR on Potus SCOTUS. Faux News remarks?

3
Sdollar456 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump said it would be difficult to get our cases to SCOTUS.

0
DrainNIH 0 points ago +2 / -2

Hmmm. So basically up yours to 2/3 of the US voting population. I wonder, how do We The People, feel about that?

1
MakeAmericaLegendary 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do you figure that? I don't understand why saying that the road ahead is difficult is leading to doomerism.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
fsoawesome 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is this about? What kind of statement was made? Quote/clip?

1
Sdollar456 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump said it would be difficult to be heard by the SCOTUS. He said it on an interview this morning.

2
fsoawesome 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why would something so absurd even be said? That's not even laughably close to being true. I can only think this is a psyop somehow.

1
Sdollar456 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m trying to rewatch the latest episodes of Rudy’s common sense to see if he gives any information on our track to SCOTUS.