Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
You can watch revisions and who did them; however, look at what was removed on Wikipedia. The portion about the order being reversed. They're trying to memory hole that.
fakepedia is a joke. Anyone can edit anything anytime they want and there is basically no oversight. Besides, Wales is an anti-Trumper through and through, so he probably allows, if not encourages, this kind of stuff. I remember a few years ago, feminists were having wikipedia edit sessions where they would scrub any page that criticized feminism. After that, pages were being changed to deflect from known wrongdoings or investigations or to question validity of assertions despite the evidence. It's another political tool of the left at this point. No one should take that site seriously, just as nobody was allowed to use it as a reference in college papers back in the day
I agree to a certain degree; however, normies use it quite often. Why can't we do the same thing, edit it correctly. It isn't insurmountable. The left has too many propaganda outlets.
good idea. If a bunch of pedes can monitor wikipedia and fix all the left's edits, that could at least halt part of the disinformation campaign, if not even redpill some people
You can watch revisions and who did them; however, look at what was removed on Wikipedia. The portion about the order being reversed. They're trying to memory hole that.
From an anonymous user as well, which is odd.
fakepedia is a joke. Anyone can edit anything anytime they want and there is basically no oversight. Besides, Wales is an anti-Trumper through and through, so he probably allows, if not encourages, this kind of stuff. I remember a few years ago, feminists were having wikipedia edit sessions where they would scrub any page that criticized feminism. After that, pages were being changed to deflect from known wrongdoings or investigations or to question validity of assertions despite the evidence. It's another political tool of the left at this point. No one should take that site seriously, just as nobody was allowed to use it as a reference in college papers back in the day
I agree to a certain degree; however, normies use it quite often. Why can't we do the same thing, edit it correctly. It isn't insurmountable. The left has too many propaganda outlets.
good idea. If a bunch of pedes can monitor wikipedia and fix all the left's edits, that could at least halt part of the disinformation campaign, if not even redpill some people
That's what I'm thinking. Have to be very careful with sources and ensure we stay on the rails.