Well be sure to hit the save button under it, because either I'm the dumbest person; or I'm a VSG autist time-travelling Pede.
Btw most people think that if they had the ability to say solve centuries old impossible math problems or physics problems; that they would seek the fame & fortune with it; but that's not how it works.
I solved these decades ago, back before my sophmore year in H.S. (before either Wiles; or even before Beal published his conjecture.) Beal's worth $1 million prize money today.
But the reality is, that's not how these things go. Like Newton or so many in history, there's no need to "publish"; it's not worth the headaches compared to continuing along in research or doing other work. And often having the answers/formulas to things is far more useful in even better new inventions. Open source has it's place, but so does closed source. Like why would I publish something which would make nearly all financial transactions (or today about half) of encryptions insecure. There's no reason to do that, especially since the USA is the leading economic player in the world. Makes no sense. But that's from my honest truth, yes this is the internet, so anyone can type anything; but I'm no troll or larper or fake. *hugs
Well be sure to hit the save button under it, because either I'm the dumbest person; or I'm a VSG autist time-travelling Pede.
Btw most people think that if they had the ability to say solve centuries old impossible math problems or physics problems; that they would seek the fame & fortune with it; but that's not how it works.
For instance,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat%27s_Last_Theorem
or
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beal_conjecture
I solved these decades ago, back before my sophmore year in H.S. (before either Wiles; or even before Beal published his conjecture.) Beal's worth $1 million prize money today.
But the reality is, that's not how these things go. Like Newton or so many in history, there's no need to "publish"; it's not worth the headaches compared to continuing along in research or doing other work. And often having the answers/formulas to things is far more useful in even better new inventions. Open source has it's place, but so does closed source. Like why would I publish something which would make nearly all financial transactions (or today about half) of encryptions insecure. There's no reason to do that, especially since the USA is the leading economic player in the world. Makes no sense. But that's from my honest truth, yes this is the internet, so anyone can type anything; but I'm no troll or larper or fake. *hugs