2235
posted ago by JustAnotherPence ago by JustAnotherPence +2235 / -0

This is something you'd learn in your first year at law school. If, as Trump's complaint alleges, Dominion did destroy evidence then the evidence is immediately assumed to support the opposing party's allegations.

Biden's defense would now have to prove there was no fraud as if Trump's team had certain evidence of there being such.

Comments (35)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
34
PeaceThroughStrength 34 points ago +36 / -2

Don't LARP as a lawyer.

Just because you allege wrongdoing and destruction of evidence doesn't mean you force the burden of proof on to the other side.

You carry the burden of proof until you show that the other side committed the wrong. You prove fraud happened before other side needs to defend themselves.

Also, here the opposing party is a Republican state government rather than Biden.

Stop with the cope and get hard into either evidence gathering or adding to the rally numbers.

17
hloblart 17 points ago +18 / -1

I believe the assumption mentioned here is if spoliation has been proven. You do not address that.

Your point about the opposing party is good.

9
PeaceThroughStrength 9 points ago +9 / -0

Nothing has been proven because there has been no case yet.

We believe we can prove it and we are currently trying to either prevent it from occurring or prevent it from getting worse.

I don't address it because we aren't there yet.

8
FRONT_TOWARD_LEFT 8 points ago +9 / -1

When canvassing boards certify results and state legislatures approve electors, they are affirming that the election and tabulation were conducted fairly and according to applicable laws.

Given the obvious levels of fraud committed, anyone advancing the false claim that the election was fairly conducted, whether through signature, vote, or public statements, is part of the conspiracy and deserves to be punished.

Never cede the null hypothesis when it is rightfully yours.

2
kag2044 2 points ago +3 / -1

This is literally the reason Rudy skirted around specifically alleging fraud in his court cases. Law is complicated, LARPing as a lawyer just makes you sound like a retard to everyone.

100% behind us supporting rallys though, that's something anyone can do

-3
VetforTrump2 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Proof of the destruction is proven. Stop larping yourself.

6
PeaceThroughStrength 6 points ago +7 / -1

Absolute kek.

Show me the court order stating that it is proven.

Inb4YouCantBecauseThereIsNoCourtHearingYet

Shut up retard, grown-ups are talking technical subject matter.