4083
Comments (143)
sorted by:
168
dontbanus 168 points ago +168 / -0

If you’re scratching your head and feeling confused about this whole legal mess, it’s because that’s what the deepstate intended the effect to be.

They want confusion.

They want gray area.

We want truth.

57
Sargon 57 points ago +58 / -1

TBF, if they want to play the ‘gray area’ game, we’ve got them nailed to the wall between the SCOTUS and the House being the final elector.

I’ve been saying since election night, if they tried to steal it, we will steal it better. So let’s play the gray area game, because they don’t think we will go there.

-25
deleted -25 points ago +2 / -27
36
RussianBot4Trump 36 points ago +36 / -0

Negative.
He said it will be hard to get it to SCOTUS. He also said he is 125% in.

10
deleted 10 points ago +16 / -6
7
D0NNIE_DARK0 7 points ago +7 / -0

Is anything a sure thing? We hope the court does the right thing.

3
deleted 3 points ago +7 / -4
2
Anaconda 2 points ago +10 / -8

Okay. So we should be ready to say "fuck Thomas and Alito" if/when they backstab the POTUS. Too many people on the right want us to avoid making them make the decision to backstab the POTUS. Them refusing to hear a case from the POTUS through a bullshit anonymous/unsigned rejection order is the same as a 9-0 vote AGAINST the POTUS.

We are big boys and girls. We can hate the 6 GOP justices pretty much if we have to. They want us to hate around 1000 nobody state legislators instead. The legislature route is much worse and harder than the SCOTUS route.

4
Gstreetshit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Funny how we are always just one more pick away from a conservative court. Even when its 6/3

3
RexCollumSilvarum 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait, Thomas is going to backstab Trump!? What did I miss?

I know the "Thomas is going to get revenge on Biden" is just a meme and who knows what he's thinking, but what makes people think he's going to rule in his favor?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
MAGAngelo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not doubting you, but why then did GEOTUS say don’t expect it to get to SCOTUS?

2
RussianBot4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is correct. However, the other guy said that according to the interview, Trump said something along the lines of him being unable to take it to the SCOTUS. That is wrong.

It is an uphill battle, but we need to fight as best we can because we will win. American freedom always wins. However, I hope and pray that we will win sooner rather than later, because if it is a lot later... I don’t want to open that box.

7
DemsFuckKids 7 points ago +7 / -0

You sure about that?

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
9
Spartacus 9 points ago +9 / -0

Trump must remain neutral or general when making comments regarding SCOTUS. He must never speak in any way that would give an appearance they or this process are in any way compromised. My take at least.

1
Jamesben 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. Play it straight. The ONLY destination for all these stare suits is the SCOTUS. They'll have to be involved. They ARE the appellate court of the USA..

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
6
DickTick 6 points ago +7 / -1

So then you just fucking lied twice and said that he said something that he didn't say?.....

And you don't think that's an issue? completely changing the President's words to mean something he never said? and even actually said quite the opposite of with his "in 125%" comment......

1
Knight1_of_Sunset 1 point ago +1 / -0

Chickenish Coward deleted his comments.

-8
deleted -8 points ago +3 / -11
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
6
Chodefish 6 points ago +7 / -1

why would he say that?

-8
deleted -8 points ago +2 / -10
8
DickTick 8 points ago +8 / -0

He didn't......

5
DickTick 5 points ago +6 / -1

What's the point of you spreading bullshit?

-3
deleted -3 points ago +5 / -8
4
Knight1_of_Sunset 4 points ago +5 / -1

You said that "Trump said in his interview yesterday it won't go to SCOTUS.", then you said that "He said it would be very difficult to get it to the SCOTUS.". Two contradictory statements that has very different meanings.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +3 / -7
2
DickTick 2 points ago +3 / -1

You specifically said that he said it would never go to the Supreme Court.... you can delete your fucking comments or change them all you want to, but everyone fucking saw it. you can't hide from that shit now, you know what the fuck we're arguing about....

I never said a goddamn thing about the Supreme Court being a failsafe or a sure thing and neither did the President, but he sure is fuck didn't say what you claimed in two different fucking comments above.......

and I did watch the interview, genius..... that's how I know you fucking lied twice before you tried to cover it up..... And I sure as fuck wasn't the only one watching.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
-5
Anaconda -5 points ago +3 / -8

That fuckwad is trying to masturbate to the state legislatures plan which is even worse than the SCOTUS plan. All those state legislatures have already rejected the POTUS and SCOTUS only requires 5 yes votes.

We are big boys and girls and can hate Alito and Thomas if they all 9 cowardly refuse to even hear the cases through anonymous/unsigned "rejection to even hear the cases" orders.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
2
DickTick 2 points ago +3 / -1

So you want us to fucking attack people when our President just said in the same interview that he's in 125%... When he was clearly talking about the legal battles....

So you want us to just say fuck that and not do what the President wants and just do what we want?..... Wtf......

3
jacquire14 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think President Trump was being intentionally elusive. No reveal yesterday. He just kept emphasizing the fraud.

-7
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
2
Gesirisi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's assume he actually plans to cross the Rubicon..... what's he going to say to the media? "If the electors pick Biden, I plan to lead a revolution?"

0
My2Cents 0 points ago +1 / -1

They will roll up any militia group in a hot second. Social media has you and everyone you know mapped out, unless you've been silent for years.

They could roll up Antifa too, if they wanted.

2
Scotty1954 2 points ago +2 / -0

You really think all the combat trained vets who will burn this shit down if they fuck Trump over are out blah-blah-blahing on social media? LOL... if you do then you are dummer than a demonrat!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Gunmolester 1 point ago +1 / -0

And we can handle the truth unlike the Left

1
SvixGale 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want copper.

Copper, lead and brass.

That’s what I want. Those are my favorite colors.

62
subspace42 62 points ago +62 / -0

Can’t wait to see the freak out that ensues when Joe loses (again).

28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
18
ImpeachTheWitchHunt 18 points ago +18 / -0

WORD OF THE DAY: SPOLIATION!!!

5
Kpstyles 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s a great word!

3
Italians_Invented_2A 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait, what?

Didn't the 3 circuit court rule against us?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Gesirisi 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was just a painter...

52
Fourtyandfourtyfive 52 points ago +52 / -0

Trying to wipe Dominion machines for a run off election over a month away. BS. Trying to destroy evidence.

Unless the machines have been confiscated, Dems will still wipe them and play dumb.

“Like with a cloth??”

Edit: Not trying to sound doomer, Sooo much evidence of fraud countrywide. Just waiting on ACB and the Supremes!!

20
Kriegson 20 points ago +20 / -0

The normal process for paper ballots is to hold them for up to 24 months in most places to ensure they can be retrieved and votes rectified. Apparently with counting machines, the procedure is to wipe them as soon as they're done, relying on the receipts they printed to be accurate. No one needs to check the code for anything fucky, no sir. No need to peek in the box, just wipe it clean and respect what came out!

Fucking ridiculous. More so when you submit a court order to stop them from wiping it at which point you DO NOT FOLLOW NORMAL PROCEDURE. Fortunately the judge came back with a rectified suit but chances are they've already changed the code with an "update" that was described.

Unless they were really sloppy, forensically speaking I don't think you could pull whatever data it was using at the time unless they missed some machines.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
6
Fourtyandfourtyfive 6 points ago +6 / -0

I’d like to use bleach on Hillary...

7
ArchbishopofKekistan 7 points ago +8 / -1

Gonna put a noose on her and say it's MAGA country? Oh, shit, nevermind, the FBI might do something.

2
cuntard 2 points ago +2 / -0

now that you mention it...

i’d love to see a noose around her neck and, by God, this is MAGA country.

10
JuicyfearsMAGA 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's not doomer to point out the truth. You're basing what you're saying in what the Dems have done, and sadly, gotten away with in the past.

They destroyed evidence in the past, why wouldn't they do it now.

They stole states the night of the election without consequence, so they proceeded to steal pa and ga and az in the following days.

We know our enemy. That's not doom.

2
DemsFuckKids 2 points ago +2 / -0

How on the fuck are they allowed to use dominion machines again?! Someone please have a link

-5
deleted -5 points ago +2 / -7
2
Knight1_of_Sunset 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bullshit, what is the timestamp of that statement.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +1 / -7
2
Knight1_of_Sunset 2 points ago +2 / -0

You deleted your original comment AND you failed to give me a timestamp.

Coward. Also, I watched the Interview, and I don't recall hearing anything like it.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Knight1_of_Sunset 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't drink and you know that everyone can see the words "DELETED" whenever someone deleted their comments, and this comments section has quite a few of them where YOUR comments supposed to be.

If you must lie, then make it believable!

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
1
Fenianlad 1 point ago +2 / -1

Bullshit. That’s not what he said and you know it.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
2
Fenianlad 2 points ago +2 / -0

Him saying SCOTUS isn’t a sure thing isn’t the same as saying it isn’t going there. And you should know by now he doesn’t play his hand out in the open. Stop spreading disinformation. Your last handful of comments put you in the “Doomer” column, and I hate that term.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
32
magnokor 32 points ago +32 / -0

Garbage judge, like most of them are, always looking for the "technicality" to side with evil and crime.

plaintiffs had not named the county officials who controlled the voting machines:

Nobody knows who controls the machines.

Dominion.

Georgia Governor.

Kamala Harris' photographer.

China.

A guy in Serbia.

Tree Rollins, Bobby Cox, Ben Matlock, Val Kilmer in that obscure movie set in Atlanta where he and Kim Basinger took part in a bank robbery?

It took three tries but, for the time being, the court finally got it right.

Probably not.

Debbie Washing-Machine-Schultz is probably outside the storage building of the voting machines right now firing away with the Chinese EMP weapon that her Pakistani spy friends gave her.

21
WassermanSchultz 21 points ago +21 / -0

Debbie Washing-Machine-Schultz is probably outside the storage building of the voting machines right now firing away with the Chinese EMP weapon that her Pakistani spy friends gave her.

She gets a bad rap in here for some reason, but she's actually really nice and her Pakistani friends are completely legit.

11
ImpeachTheWitchHunt 11 points ago +11 / -0

Your sarcasm is too real. 10/10 for shillmatation

-1
JuicyfearsMAGA -1 points ago +5 / -6

I'm not as anti semetic as some on here are, but fuck that nasty treasonous Jew cunt

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
ArchbishopofKekistan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Will never call ole Debbie anything else now.

15
Scumbag-reddit 15 points ago +15 / -0

Thankfully, the last order gets it right and stops Georgia officials from erasing information on voting machines at the heart of the debate about election fraud.

No, it stops it on paper. They already removed servers stated from earlier posts here, per witness accounts. Why would they listen to the rule of law they're trying to dismantle?

My understanding is there is a trove of evidence outside of just the servers, but hopefully it's the good guys that seized the servers and were using the Tuesday date as a disinformation campaign against the commies.

14
Samuel_L_Bronkowitz 14 points ago +14 / -0

Every one of these machines needs to be rounded up and never used again.

4
Liberty5-3000 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cart them off to the gulag!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
13
Huginn 13 points ago +13 / -0

I think the data is already gone. Why would they not just wipe it out in secret the moment it was possible? Why wait until monday? I think it was gonw before the lawsuit was filed. I guess we'll see.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
6
PresidentErectHunter 6 points ago +8 / -2

Trump sounded really down in the interview yesterday on FOX. Said it is difficult to get the case in front of the SCOTUS. Sounds like he is relying on the Courts.

Did not sound at all like a guy who is ready to unilaterally invoke EO 13848.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
2
censorthisss 2 points ago +2 / -0

We're asking too much of one man to do what would basically be starting WW3.

If Trump did go for it and he declared the election null and void, he'd be assassinated within a few days. The media would celebrate the death of a "mad dictator" and anyone who questioned the narrative would be banned from social media and possibly arrested.

George Washington didn't become George Washington the national hero until well after thousands of Patriots rose up and did what had to be done.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SvixGale 1 point ago +1 / -0

Art. Of. War.

1
tdwinner2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree with everything you wrote. I deeply want to believe that he has something big that will justify invoking his powers. It is looking like that is now the only remaining option because i doubt we'll get enough House and Senate seats to challenge the EC vote and get a contingent election. God help us if GEOTUS fails us.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
D0NNIE_DARK0 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hopefully it’s some Art of War bullshit. He’s not down and out.

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine thinking that Trump controls

the Secret Service, the US Marshals, the CIA's special operations group, the deltas, the green barets, the SEALs, etc, etc.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +4 / -0

Give me just one instance of Trump successfully directing an agency to get something done.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
SvixGale 2 points ago +2 / -0

US Marshall’s killed that cocksucker antifag who murdered the patriot in Oregon.

US marshals & other federal troops deployed to Portland and other cities to guard federal buildings, as well as snatch antifags off the streets for arrests.

You are a real doomer, pal.

2
Wallypip3 2 points ago +2 / -0

If that is the case, then it would give credence to the election is rigged argument.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
5
grunt2pog 5 points ago +5 / -0

Serious question, how and/or why do the machines matter after the hand recount of the paper ballots?

8
JuicyfearsMAGA 8 points ago +9 / -1

We don't need a recount of the fraud. We need an audit and that includes the machines, which were programmed to switch votes. We need the machines to see if the totals match the paper ballots and look for inconsistencies.

You know damn well when the voting stopped with 90 to 90 percent of the vote counted, trump was up anywhere from 300 to 700 thousand votes depending on the state. Fake, fraudulent, manufactured ballots for Biden in the millions occured, and you're asking why we shouldn't support erasing the machines and destroying evidence?

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
4
JuicyfearsMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'll bite but it's clear you support election being stolen. In most states, the mail in ballots had been tabulated or a chunk of them were counted prior to or during election night. That's how statistics on mail in ballots sent out and returned were reported prior to election day. Secondly, counties like Milwaukee were reported as being almost finished by midnight election night, ditto in Virginia, ditto in Georgia, and it was reported that included total ballots mail in and in person.

Then, they shut down counting for the night, and you're simply ignoring the fact that at this point they resumed counting in secret and brought in the manufactured ballots. Of the ballots received after midnight November 3rd, 96 percent Nationwide went to Biden. In the states blatantly stolen, 99 percent went to Biden. This is statistically impossible. It's also illegal that this was allowed to happen and there is no way to verify these votes. But we know they were backdated. We know they don't have signatures to match. We know they include thousands of dead people, people registering at post offices etc.

But you're right, even Sept democrat party operatives were leaking info to the media that trump would win on election night, and then via mail in fraud, the election would go to Biden in the following days and weeks. Biden admitted it, the media flaunted it, the globalists and deep state perpetrated it. Question is, are you stupid enough to believe it and other question is what will the rest of us do about it.

6
Rocks_vs_Uzis 6 points ago +7 / -1

Digital fingerprints of weighted distribution algorithm. Paper ballots were filled out to match the numbers coming out of the machines and other ballots went "missing". This is the reason the count was stopped and started again when nobody on our side was present. Those machines can prove vote flipping and other fuckery took place.

0
grunt2pog 0 points ago +1 / -1

But the recent hand count did not involve the machines at all, which basically confirms no nefarious involvement from the machines, correct?

The machines just tabulate (count) ballots that were casted by hand. If the hand recount matches the machine tabulations, then how is an algorithm at play?

1
BarneyFranksNipples 1 point ago +1 / -0

The quantity of total ballots match, yes.

Whether a ballot cast for Trump came out for Trump (or other candidates) 1:1 is what the machines will prove. If Trump only got to keep 80% of the votes cast for him and the other 20% were given to Biden, the total ballots will match, but the results won’t.

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

The hand recount counts how many votes there are for each candidate.

1
grunt2pog 1 point ago +1 / -0

By counting the paper ballot, I think, yes? Which does not involve the machines. The second recount — that’s ongoing now — is a rescan of the ballots into the machines.

If those two recounts match, then doesn’t that verify the machines? Or is there something else at play?

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the machines came up with the cheating, and after that the Demonrats have produced enough fake ballots to match the counts given by Dominion.

It's little hope that the paper ballots and the machine counts won't match now. Probably they didn't match on election night, but it's too late now

1
grunt2pog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again, this is what I’m failing to understand about the recent hand count. Doesn’t the hand count confirm a 1:1 with the (initial) machine tabulation?

If the initial tally was 1,000 votes, 600 Trump, 400 Biden and a hand count of those 1,000 ballots yield the same numbers, does that not verify the machines?

I’m not questioning the validity of the ballots themselves, just the claims about the machines swapping counts, etc.

1
Rocks_vs_Uzis 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lol you still think the machines only tabulate ballots? The machines literally create the votes, ballots are then filled out aftewards to match the results from the machines. We've been explaining this for weeks. HAMR and Scorecard.

1
grunt2pog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Has this been proven? I’d love to read about this if you have a source.

1
Rocks_vs_Uzis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Has the existence of HAMR and Scorecard been proven? Has fractional voting that was first exposed in 2006 been proven? Have computer scientists with PHDs from MIT proven mathematically the implementation of a weighted distribution algorithm in every swing state been proven? Has witness testimony from retired SIGINT personnel from the army's 305th intel battalion been proven? Has video evidence referenced directly by exhibit number in Sidney Powell's court filing in Georgia been proven? Cut the shit immediately! There was massive fraud and some might even call it an attack. Welcome to 4th generation warfare. God help you if you don't even know what THAT is.

4
cajun_robear 4 points ago +4 / -0

One thing that they better understand is that 73 million pissed off Americans will not allow a legally elected president NOT to be sworn in. STOP THE STEAL - OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
Msmcontrolsnarrative 4 points ago +4 / -0

I thought you guys were really going to kick off the second revolution last night.

3
ImpeachTheWitchHunt 3 points ago +3 / -0

You guys? Buddy, fren, pal, you’re here. You’re with us. It’s us guys. Don’t you chicken out on me!! DON’T YOU CHICKEN OUT ON ME SOLDIER!! WEREN’T YOU A CHEESEMAKER!?!!?????

Report for duty! Go clean that latrine for not being a teamplayer!... with a toothbrush!!

0
Msmcontrolsnarrative 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oh, that day may come but it seemed like some were going to start last night.

4
JBear205 4 points ago +4 / -0

They should subpoena Amy Kobuchar and Elizabeth Warren along with every liberal reporter who wrote an article on the risk of using Dominion. Get them all on record as to why they were concerned. If reporters won't investigate, do it through the court?

4
SoldierofKek 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ahh. So this is what Lin Wood meant by :I won, I lost, then I won. Ok fine. They did the right thing in the end. Now let's get our asses to SCOTUS. I particularly like Chris Parnell's case. He should appeal to scotus on the grounds that the change which allowed no excuse absentee voting is a violation not both the Pennsylvania state constitution and the US Constitution. In fact most of these changes in PA, MI and GA we're done by either executive or judicial fiat, hence unconstitutional.

3
Deadsilos 3 points ago +3 / -0

Very helpful - thank you!

3
Pierre_Delecto 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't even want to read the article. These bastards knew the machines were evidence.

3
THE_golden_goddess 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m glad I’m not the only one who is confused about GA. Holy shit pedes.

3
Bedminster 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem is in most of these cases PA included the court orders are being totally ignored. They're just going about destroying evidence even with a court order telling them not to. PA ignored a SCOTUS order to put aside ballots with the envelopes and they didn't stop. They were furiously mixing them in with all the other ballots and it took a second order to make them stop. Dems have ZERO regards for court orders at this point and why people have not been arrested is beyond me.

3
OhShnigums 3 points ago +3 / -0

Another reversal of the order to hit tough the machines..... After they were probably already all wiped anyways

3
obviouslytom 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am sure that Fulton county will not comply with the order or say that they wiped the machines before the order came.

2
Spanishkay 2 points ago +2 / -0

Worth the sticky!!! 🙏🏿

2
bluetrench 2 points ago +2 / -0

The article starts out by saying that there was potential wiping going on in Fulton County, and then concludes that the judge finally got it right the 3rd time when ruling that 3 counties (excluding Fulton) could not wipe the machines.

Did the author miss that detail, or is he/she being purposefully obtuse?

2
Choppermagic 2 points ago +2 / -0

SCOTUS is not a sure thing, but they need to decide if they will protect the rule of law and democracy.

2
BanMySteakKnives 2 points ago +2 / -0

TLDR- We win.

1
Warren_Puffitt 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dont understand the logic of boycotting the polls.