1495
Comments (60)
sorted by:
48
deleted 48 points ago +48 / -0
14
jomten 14 points ago +14 / -0

Honestly if we could only do one thing id have to say stop the propaganda machine of the commies.

Facebook, twitler, and the fakenews media are the biggest weapons. They not only hide the truth, they spread lies.

11
WhiteTrashJesus 11 points ago +12 / -1

They would have to amend the constitution for that but id be down

7
Rainman 7 points ago +7 / -0

Many states simply changed the way they conducted elections following a faulty supreme court ruling Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964).

4
Voted4Johnson 4 points ago +4 / -0

If it was implemented federally yes but the states have the power to determine how to divide their votes.

4
WhiteTrashJesus 4 points ago +5 / -1

They can take that power away for federal elections because the people in red areas in blue states are American citizens who are being disenfranchized. But it needs to be an amendment. As far as state elections go there should be federal oversight to ensure they follow their own laws, and mandate secure processes

2
Wankerton 2 points ago +3 / -1

Agreed. Cali pede here and there's no reason to vote for president here. I still voted for Trump because I wanted to pump those numbers. But it's sad to know that the bay area and LA determine where ALL our electoral votes go.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
tiffany46 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every state should use the maine/Nebraska system. Its the only way to ensure people are represented

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
8
antineut2109 8 points ago +8 / -0

Theres no such thing as Blue states.....turn blue cities into districts with no representative like DC

3
Warren_Puffitt 3 points ago +3 / -0

no such thing as Blue states

Idk...Hawaii? It's been extremely cucked out there for a long time.

4
Xtracreddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, but a lot of them wanted sovereignty since before they became a state. Let them go...just keep control of the military assets there for national security reasons

2
antineut2109 2 points ago +2 / -0

U came up with one of the virtually only exception also Delaware probably!

7
E-dantes 7 points ago +7 / -0

I would be okay with this, if it wasn't for that pesky constitution.</sarcasm>

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
3
E-dantes 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree, to a point. I'm not a scholar when it comes to presidential authority in a situation like this. I do believe we are as close to what Lincoln dralt with as we ever have been, except secession, they are going for full control. i know this, whatever Trump finds necessary to do, i am 100% behind him. But i think he is trying to exhaust every option of law, before anything Lincoln was forced to utilize as far as military involvement, fullscale.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
E-dantes 2 points ago +2 / -0

And i support that, if it comes to it. Sign my ass up, top of the page, big and bold!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
7
Sully_Emerson 7 points ago +8 / -1

Most states are overwhelmingly red. They are often (including this election) swayed blue by a few populous cities and corrupt election practices in said cities. Lets put the cities under federal / martial law.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 6 points ago +6 / -0

All major cities should just be federal territory and the red areas can still be states.

2
Paul_Revere 2 points ago +2 / -0

At first, I thought that was just a cute one-liner. But, having thought it over, I like it. A lot.

5
memtndude 5 points ago +6 / -1

Uh...no. Just because your state is overrun with commies, doesn't mean it has to effect mine. My governor, senate and house are all heavy non-commies and none appear on the list of traitors who pretend to be republican but then asked Trump to concede.

2
debacle 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you don't give these states a current round of bailouts, that's basically what's going to happen. New York cannot afford to survive without a massive injection of cash. NYC will be the next Baltimore.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Lautruch3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or at least "until we can understand what's going on"....

2
MAGASquatch 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think the RED states are any less corrupt, just because they are not BLUE? It seems to me there are plenty of RED politicians that are very silent on the election fraud. In fact there appears to me that a number of the RED elite are desperately clinging to a Biden victory. Bush, Chaney. McCaine, Romney, Kaisich, and all the Never-Trumpers. I wonder what's in Hillary's emails that these defectors don't want us to know? We at least know that "they all knew what Jeffrey Epstein was doing," and failed to do anything about it. Just ask Cindy McCaine.

2
Loiuzein 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. Mobilize, the government will not do this.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
jgardner 2 points ago +2 / -0

No joke.

Or we can just hang all the traitors.

2
JustInTime2_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree.

2
boreal_storm 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reconstruction 2: Electric Boogaloo

1
FuckTheOtherSide 1 point ago +1 / -0

CA resident. I approve this message.

1
HaoleFrens 1 point ago +1 / -0

Need those Govs to act on those Podesta plans. When that happens, you can read this to see what will be done.

https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1363&context=nulr

1
BoricuaPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, as a resident of a territory I can tell you that's no solution at all.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
BoricuaPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Puerto Rico is being run directly by the Federal Fiscal Control Board, appointed by Congress, since 2015. Most of the membere are Republicans. They have full power of the purse over any government spending, full subpoena power, power to approve or disapprove budgets and any legislation that involves over $10K in spending (which is everything). So far they have accomplished jack squat. Our government ignores them and does what it wants.

1
ParkingLotRanger 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are all red states. Haven’t you been paying attention?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
OurTrumpCard 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm good, how about the federal government allow the state of jefferson and we would get 1/3 of california without even a gun shot.

1
spuger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ny resident, yes please.

1
smartass 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like how you think :)

1
RC22 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rats I was hoping it was a Trump tweet

1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

no

1
UnderCoverTrumper 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are no blue states.

1
ServerTowerofBabel 1 point ago +1 / -0

They'd love that. Strong centralized government power.

0
BigIslandFrog 0 points ago +1 / -1

Um, how exactly does that work? How do they "lose" statehood?

But sure.

Next time - put the title in ****BOLD ALL CAPS.

It'll still be nonsense. But ****LOUDER!!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
BigIslandFrog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice ad hominem.

But, that's "why", not how.

Perhaps you could share your deep understanding of civics and the Constitution to explain "how". Think it through, as you suggest, and describe the process.

Hint: It takes more than your feelings.

You seem to assume that the "states", rather than Dem gov't persons, are the traitors. Interesting take.

Very leftist, if you want to know the truth.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
Dialectic 0 points ago +1 / -1

Spicy!