47
Comments (6)
sorted by:
2
AmazingFlightLizard 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cool. It’s good conservative judges try to be meticulous and get it all right, and play by the rules.

But liberal judges don’t. Remind me what terrible fate has befallen them.

We’re gonna keep playing by the rules til we’re lining up for a firing squad and ask each other “Why didn’t anybody stand up for us?”

2
Filial_Piety_is_key 2 points ago +2 / -0

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

7h

Replying to

@NoClutchTruth

All conspiracies and assumptions about Judge Batten aside, he appears to understand not only what is at stake, but how meticulous this all must be. He was correct to reverse the original decision based on jurisdiction. With the understanding that the plaintiffs did not name...

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

7h

election officials being brought in as parties, for the purposes of discovery (gathering evidence), the question of possession and authority comes into play. Election authority comes down to counties. Those counties technically have possession of the evidence. In order to...

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

6h

rule on judgement against them, for the purpose of discovery, they would have to be named in the lawsuit. In essence, the judge has no authority over these county officials, because they aren't specifically named. By law that is his duty. Don't be mad. He actually paved the way. Image

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

6h

By citing Jacobson v Florida Secretary of State he showed us the flaw in the suit AND showed us how to implement change for future lawsuits to include EVERY OFFICIAL TOP TO BOTTOM who is involved in the elections. This should also include Dominion officials that are in each state

Image

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

· 6h The best part of this latest order is the fact that Judge Batten actually backed the Defendants into a corner. In a brilliant display of lawfare, @SidneyPowell1 's team presented that in order to alleviate any concerns about Intellectual Property security, the defendants could...

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

6h

bring in their experts to participate in any video recorded inspections and these inspections would be provided ONLY to the court for security. They have no choice but to certify the evidence. It is their system, being inspected by Sidney Powell's team, supervised by Dominion. Image

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

6h

BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE! Judge Batten forced the defendants to show cause why these forensic examinations should NOT happen and is requiring an evidentiary brief by Wednesday. They must prove there is a FACTUAL reason for NOT completing these supervised and recorded inspections. Image

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

6h

Still not through with the genius of this order. Judge Batten did ENJOIN and RESTRAIN the alterations of any voting machines in Cobb, Gwinnett, and Cherokees counties. People are going to ask; "What about the update they did on the machines?" Short answer: We can't help that.

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

6h

The long answer is, it doesn't matter. Forensic examination is going to show the alterations. Digital footprints are almost impossible to hide from the right Digital Soldier. Sidney has the best. Not only that, remember 52 USC 20701. All election records are required to be...

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

6h

maintained for a minimum of 22 months. Any records altered or deleted, there will be evidence, will make people subject to criminal charges. That is a whole different thread though. Familiarize yourselves with title 52. It is rather simple to understand.

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

6h

The final nail in the coffin is my very favorite and will be the coup de grace. Judge Batten, that glorious son of a gun, required the contract between Dominion and The State of Georgia be introduced into evidence. This is significant, because it will name all those involved...

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

6h

in the rushed deal in spite of obvious opposition from both lawmakers and voters. I beleive$107 million was the total at the end. Those are Georgian taxpayer dollars and Georgians are entitled to know how every penny was spent. This part of relief could be considered precedential

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

5h

I say precedential, because this could set further precedent on the transparency of government deal making and allow for expanded scrutiny of vendor contracts. The who, what, where, when, and why approach to government accountability. All of this should be public domain.

ZultanPhysics

@NoClutchTruth

·

5h

In closing, please don't allow yourselves to be discouraged by the ebb and flow of the storm. The waves will come and they will go. Cheer on and pray for @SidneyPowell1 and @LLinWood and all of the exceptional Patriots on their legal team. Fear not Patriots. Put your focus on God Image

3
jackasskicker [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wonderful, thank you, Pede.

1
yanksali 1 point ago +1 / -0

He is stating all necessary defendants were not originally includes which resulted in confusing orders by the judge, As an attorney I know when you are in a hurry to get something filed you may neglect to name all necessary parties. It happens to the best of attorneys.

1
jackasskicker [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Read the whole thread.

1
yanksali 1 point ago +1 / -0

He is right. Only some judges take their oaths to execute the law as written. I would say it is the minority of judges.