Could some pede please explain to me: how do you square up the idea that some votes were changed digitally via an algorithm residing on the machines with the ballot counts. I get that there was most likely massive ballot fraud, but I don’t see how ballot fraud and electronic counting fraud square up with each other.
I may be preaching to the choir on this point, but ballot fraud can, and in this case has, occur by printing out fake ballots. What we have seen so far are mail-in ballots with perfectly marked bubbles for Biden without any creases on the paper, indicative of them having never been in the envelope like they are meant to be. On top of that, there were no other votes cast on the ballot for senate or house representatives, so why would you vote for just the presidential candidate but literally nobody else? The rest of the people on the ballot are the ones who pass the legislation anyways! It's moronic!
As for the electronic part, these votes were either scanned once or multiple times in addition to scanning legitimate ballots dozens of times. The votes add up in the few hours they were cheating behind closed doors.
Algorithms and vote-switching on the fly -- centralized fraud.
Ballot counts -- localized fraud.
Localized fraud is concerned with downticket candidates as well as the presidential race. Centralized fraud was the backup for stealing the presidential race -- which is why some of the algorithms were so ridiculous.
I’m just saying that the electronically altered votes would show up as a difference in a recount whereas the fake ballots would count the same way over and over, right?
I think their strategy was to make the voting and counting process so ridiculously complicated and convoluted that we would never be able to figure out (or prove) what happened.
They stole votes many ways. Thank God it's all coming out now.
Could some pede please explain to me: how do you square up the idea that some votes were changed digitally via an algorithm residing on the machines with the ballot counts. I get that there was most likely massive ballot fraud, but I don’t see how ballot fraud and electronic counting fraud square up with each other.
I may be preaching to the choir on this point, but ballot fraud can, and in this case has, occur by printing out fake ballots. What we have seen so far are mail-in ballots with perfectly marked bubbles for Biden without any creases on the paper, indicative of them having never been in the envelope like they are meant to be. On top of that, there were no other votes cast on the ballot for senate or house representatives, so why would you vote for just the presidential candidate but literally nobody else? The rest of the people on the ballot are the ones who pass the legislation anyways! It's moronic!
As for the electronic part, these votes were either scanned once or multiple times in addition to scanning legitimate ballots dozens of times. The votes add up in the few hours they were cheating behind closed doors.
Algorithms and vote-switching on the fly -- centralized fraud. Ballot counts -- localized fraud.
Localized fraud is concerned with downticket candidates as well as the presidential race. Centralized fraud was the backup for stealing the presidential race -- which is why some of the algorithms were so ridiculous.
I’m just saying that the electronically altered votes would show up as a difference in a recount whereas the fake ballots would count the same way over and over, right?
Why not both?
I think their strategy was to make the voting and counting process so ridiculously complicated and convoluted that we would never be able to figure out (or prove) what happened.
They stole votes many ways. Thank God it's all coming out now.