No it doesn't. Repetition does not equate to being correct.
They no other motivation? According to who? You? Please.
Again, were that the case, anyone who said Trump colluded with Russia to fix the 2016 election in his favor were right since it was repeated over and over. That is directly comparable because it relies on the exact same logic.
Proof is not democratic. You aren't correct simply because people agree with you. That's what's known as "confirmation bias".
No it doesn't. Repetition does not equate to being correct.
They no other motivation? According to who? You? Please.
Again, were that the case, anyone who said Trump colluded with Russia to fix the 2016 election in his favor were right since it was repeated over and over. That is directly comparable because it relies on the exact same logic.
Proof is not democratic. You aren't correct simply because people agree with you. That's what's known as "confirmation bias".
Stay in denial all you want. You keep thinking the way you do.