RIght, what I'm saying is he doesn't know if any of that traffic is from the systems that are supposed to be isolated. All he knows is that Dominion, Scytl etc own certain IP addresses and you can watch information flow between those addresses. But the voting machines were in various county and state locations in county/city/state owned buildings. If anything, internet traffic from the machines would have originated from whatever internet those buildings have where the counting was done. He would have to first know what IP addresses to watch, and I doubt he would know which IPs the counting buildings used for Internet. But again, that building is sending every device on its Wifi, on its network etc out via a single IP. So you can't tell if its a pol-worker's cell phone watching Chinese TikTok or if its a voting machine that should not have been connected.
I hope they have the Frankfurt server, thats the only way to prove this.
OK, gotcha. Yeah - he did say having the server would allow them to deconstruct down to the individual machines. No matter what, we want those Frankfurt servers.
I wish someone could find Gina Haskel. Seems like an easy thing to do...
Thats actually a very good video. He does a good job isolating the fraud to different areas and explaining it. Thats a big problem right now, the fraud was so rampant at different levels, its hard to sort it all out and argue specifics. On top of the obvious fraud, these IT systems seem to have been purposely done in a confusing and less than secure way.
Same reason Hildawg setup an email server separate from the government. It wasn't just to hide stuff from FOIA, its to also give plausible deniability.. "I didn't give classified information out! I was hacked!" Well when you setup a server and foregoes every modern security measure. You might as well have given it away.
RIght, what I'm saying is he doesn't know if any of that traffic is from the systems that are supposed to be isolated. All he knows is that Dominion, Scytl etc own certain IP addresses and you can watch information flow between those addresses. But the voting machines were in various county and state locations in county/city/state owned buildings. If anything, internet traffic from the machines would have originated from whatever internet those buildings have where the counting was done. He would have to first know what IP addresses to watch, and I doubt he would know which IPs the counting buildings used for Internet. But again, that building is sending every device on its Wifi, on its network etc out via a single IP. So you can't tell if its a pol-worker's cell phone watching Chinese TikTok or if its a voting machine that should not have been connected.
I hope they have the Frankfurt server, thats the only way to prove this.
OK, gotcha. Yeah - he did say having the server would allow them to deconstruct down to the individual machines. No matter what, we want those Frankfurt servers.
I wish someone could find Gina Haskel. Seems like an easy thing to do...
MISSING: Hunter, Haskel & Coomer
We know it goes to Frankfurt. Russell Ramsland proves it. He covers it in-depth.
https://youtu.be/l-1fU5uWCBU
There was a study by Texas security firm that is now public. What do you think if this?
https://youtu.be/l-1fU5uWCBU
Thats actually a very good video. He does a good job isolating the fraud to different areas and explaining it. Thats a big problem right now, the fraud was so rampant at different levels, its hard to sort it all out and argue specifics. On top of the obvious fraud, these IT systems seem to have been purposely done in a confusing and less than secure way.
Same reason Hildawg setup an email server separate from the government. It wasn't just to hide stuff from FOIA, its to also give plausible deniability.. "I didn't give classified information out! I was hacked!" Well when you setup a server and foregoes every modern security measure. You might as well have given it away.
interesting note on the plausible deniability.