No he did not show that the machines communicated to Dominion IPs. He showed Dominion IPs communicating with other Dominion IPs and Scytl owned IPs. We know they have offices all over the world, so all he can see is that information traffic increased on election night.. Which I would argue,, well DUH!
Remember, these machines were at the poll counting locations where there were thousands upon thousands of locations all over the US. Each with different IPs and not owned by Dominion. They would be state/county/city run facilities with internet connections registered to the respective government agencies.
I'm not disputing fraud here. I'm showing that the evidence they are presenting is very flawed, the real evidence can only be had by a court order to inspect the machines themselves, logs from network (if any) from the polling locations, and actual server logs from the servers that talk to the voting machines.
anyone downvoting.. prove me wrong. I'd be happy to discuss further. I am an expert in this area and have designed and setup many corporate networks over the last 20 years that interconnect multiple office buildings and datacenters. I know how this works.
Dominion is a closed source OS and they're not going to retool the image for each network so it can loop into the government servers.
it's all being piped to one place. And that's an outside server. If if was any other way, it'd be too messy to support.
I'm betting the government IT were told to whitelist the MAC's on those machines and just let it punch holes in the firewall to go wherever they wanted. If they were using the governments copper, they could parse those logs from their servers and find out. But Dominion machines are also capable of using Cell routers. So if they set up a mesh network with a cell AP, it's going to be a lot harder to find out.
But you're not going to retool where the data is dumping to for each building. You're just not.
What are you talking about? There is no "re-tooling". I never said they were communicating to "government servers" here are the plain facts.
He cannot know what devices were causing the traffic between the IP addresses.
The IP addresses he was looking at are Dominion owned. Meaning they are assigned to Dominion buildings.
The voting machines in question were NOT in Dominion owned locations. They were in government civics buildings counting the ballots. If they connected to the internet from there.. It would be originating from IP addresses assigned to the internet servicing the government building. OR.. They used cellphone internet, which would be a random IPv6 address. Which again means he cannot know what IP to watch to "claim" these devices were on the internet.
No he did not show that the machines communicated to Dominion IPs. He showed Dominion IPs communicating with other Dominion IPs and Scytl owned IPs. We know they have offices all over the world, so all he can see is that information traffic increased on election night.. Which I would argue,, well DUH!
Remember, these machines were at the poll counting locations where there were thousands upon thousands of locations all over the US. Each with different IPs and not owned by Dominion. They would be state/county/city run facilities with internet connections registered to the respective government agencies.
I'm not disputing fraud here. I'm showing that the evidence they are presenting is very flawed, the real evidence can only be had by a court order to inspect the machines themselves, logs from network (if any) from the polling locations, and actual server logs from the servers that talk to the voting machines.
anyone downvoting.. prove me wrong. I'd be happy to discuss further. I am an expert in this area and have designed and setup many corporate networks over the last 20 years that interconnect multiple office buildings and datacenters. I know how this works.
Dominion is a closed source OS and they're not going to retool the image for each network so it can loop into the government servers.
it's all being piped to one place. And that's an outside server. If if was any other way, it'd be too messy to support.
I'm betting the government IT were told to whitelist the MAC's on those machines and just let it punch holes in the firewall to go wherever they wanted. If they were using the governments copper, they could parse those logs from their servers and find out. But Dominion machines are also capable of using Cell routers. So if they set up a mesh network with a cell AP, it's going to be a lot harder to find out.
But you're not going to retool where the data is dumping to for each building. You're just not.
What are you talking about? There is no "re-tooling". I never said they were communicating to "government servers" here are the plain facts.
Mac addies of voting machines.