You don't understand the comment dumbass. Everywhere includes the people that don't vote at all. Your definition of everyone is everyone that votes. My definition of everyone is everyone over 18 that can vote. There are enough 18+ people that don't vote to sway an entire election regardless of what party they join or form. Why should they not be encouraged to vote if they are legally allowed to? Sure, some existing party members would split but calling it a stupid idea is equally retarded.
You don't understand the comment dumbass. Everywhere includes the people that don't vote at all. Your definition of everyone is everyone that votes. My definition of everyone is everyone over 18 that can vote. There are enough 18+ people that don't vote to sway an entire election regardless of what party they join or form. Why should they not be encouraged to vote if they are legally allowed to? Sure, some existing party members would split but calling it a stupid idea is equally retarded.
If they don't vote now, a new party won't get them off the bench.
Look at all the comments on this thread. The common sense consensus is: third parties are suicide, always have been.
Please give me examples of times when a third party did NOT cause the election of it's opponents.