2675
Comments (30)
sorted by:
58
FredRedd 58 points ago +59 / -1

"Well that's interesting and all, and requires a full review in the future. But... for now we're just going to certify for Biden anyway..."

37
deleted 37 points ago +38 / -1
14
answermyanswer 14 points ago +14 / -0

Reminds me of when Reagan signed the amnesty bill because the dems promised to increase border security. They lied and suffered no repercussions.

7
Testosteroneape2000 7 points ago +9 / -2

Lmao....spot on

42
magapotus 42 points ago +42 / -0

The whole Democratic Party establishment must be arrested. This is the real deal. Sedition, treason, conspiring to overthrow and destroy our elections cannot stand with a slap on the wrist. Perp walks live, trials live and the death penalty to all.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
29
BasteSpuds 29 points ago +29 / -0

So my nerd brother explained to me how packet sniffers work. Nothing sent over the web is truly secure.

27
WassermanSchultz 27 points ago +27 / -0

Download Wireshark and you can get started sniffing like Biden.

8
al45 8 points ago +8 / -0

Take my updoot

8
MassRelay 8 points ago +8 / -0

Top kek

14
bytemuncher 14 points ago +14 / -0

If they have the packets then that means they had packet capture devices ready to capture relevant traffic. You can't "hack" packets after the fact, they have to be captured. I hope he is referring to actual packets and not conflating that with device logs.

3
Sapphire2Sea 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is my fear too. Unless POYUS engineered in advance a scheme to observe the server in real time. I’m guessing he may be conflating packets with logs after the fact. I hope I’m wrong

2
wiombims 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aren't the undersea cables mirrored? US to GER, bam! 24hr capture. I don't see potus waking up to being shafted the morning after and thinking to himself "oh gee, I better let the mirrored packets expire and see what happens with this election" but that's just my opinion. I also doubt there's anything incriminating in those packets but it looks bad for election integrity no matter what's in the packets; even if all they have are logs.

1
MetalRiddle 1 point ago +1 / -0

They've been preparing for this shit for over a year.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
DeadOverRed 3 points ago +4 / -1

You can be secure, or share information- you can't have both.

12
OrangeElvis 12 points ago +13 / -1

Doomers may become sunshine shitters when this is all said and done. The whole Gomert/Powell/McInerny confirmation gave it a bit more life than simple speculation. However, the 18th looms very large. I think I am going to start doing more cardio and get my "oh shit" backpack up-to-date and make some others for my family...

6
KARamerica 6 points ago +6 / -0

God Bless you, sir!

3
TakingCoatsWIN 3 points ago +3 / -0

So do we have the servers or not?

When they say the have the traffic? Does that mean they don't have the physical servers?

I'm tech illiterate so I don't know what this means.

4
ShwoopDaddy 4 points ago +4 / -0

I understand we have "off the record" operations. Thats where I believe if any of this stuff is real, it will be off the record. The problem is we will not know the actual things until declassification and whatnot several years from now

3
Cali_Republican 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's no actual proof of the servers being in our custody. Just rumors and speculation at this point. New one came out today about the CIA defending the location and special forces assaulting it with casualties on the special forces. But as I said, its all rumors at this point.

3
TakingCoatsWIN 3 points ago +3 / -0

That has been around for over a week.

The new thing that came out today was that Gina haspel is under arrest and was charged for treason for that Frankfurt raid. And that she was there when it happened. https://thedonald.win/p/11Qkx3cpcL/can-anyone-else-confirm-this-han/c/

Sounds fake though.

1
MetalRiddle 1 point ago +1 / -0

This would mean they had a "tap" on the line. Like recording a phonecall, but for computer data. Having the servers is not so important as packet capture would actually show moment by moment every communication between the servers.

2
ALT26 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let the public see and download the Wireshark captures of the packet trace. Why people are not in jail is beyond me.

2
MetalRiddle 2 points ago +2 / -0

If this is what it sounds like, it is massive. Packet capture means not just that we say "Biden got an impossible number of votes", but we actually have a third party recording of the precise commands sent to change the vote.

2
faughtfarms 2 points ago +2 / -0

My dance in my head is so epic right now!!!!

1
TheBehavingBeaver 1 point ago +1 / -0

Saved

1
naraset 1 point ago +1 / -0

why is 'white' quoted. do they not know what a white hat hacker is?

1
MetalRiddle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct.