No, circular logic is you claiming that what you said in a previous post is verified as fact because you claimed in another post that it was verified as fact. You haven't given a single source or any information that would verify anything you have said.
but if I give sources and proof, that is proof I’m a “leaker”
Except that you haven't given any sources or proof. You do understand that "trust me dude my dad is like the head of the Army" is not proof, right?
All I'm asking for is somebody, anybody that would have knowledge of this to corroborate what you are saying.
It could be that you do have inside sources and are telling us all the truth, I would like nothing better than for you to be correct, because that would mean that we have them by the balls and this is all getting ready to come crashing down. With that being said, you have to understand why people are skeptical.
No, circular logic is you claiming that what you said in a previous post is verified as fact because you claimed in another post that it was verified as fact. You haven't given a single source or any information that would verify anything you have said.
Except that you haven't given any sources or proof. You do understand that "trust me dude my dad is like the head of the Army" is not proof, right?
All I'm asking for is somebody, anybody that would have knowledge of this to corroborate what you are saying.
It could be that you do have inside sources and are telling us all the truth, I would like nothing better than for you to be correct, because that would mean that we have them by the balls and this is all getting ready to come crashing down. With that being said, you have to understand why people are skeptical.