5404
posted ago by daddydrix ago by daddydrix +5404 / -0

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2020/09/28/runbeck-election-services-prints-ballots-every-election-season/3523196001/

We need to DIG on this company!

Runbeck was name dropped in Jan Bryant's testimony in Arizona. She testified that "Runbeck" was delivering more ballots for days after the election ended.

Update:

Dominion Voting.com and Runbeck.net were registered 22 days a part in 2005 with GoDaddy!

I also uncovered this article naming another company that was "helping". Their domain was registered in 2018. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200923005697/en/BlueCrest-and-Runbeck-Election-Services-Team-up-to-Tackle-Vote-by-Mail-Surge

Comments (76)
sorted by:
139
deleted 139 points ago +139 / -0
44
IAmCovfefe 44 points ago +44 / -0

I love how that wasn’t the topic she came to present. This was discovered while questioning her and she informed everyone that when they thought they were done counting, another truck load of ballots would be delivered. Amazing.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
105
WaitingOnTheDay 105 points ago +110 / -5

I think we need to keep a little bit calm. She did not testify that they were printing them. She testified that it was either printing or high speed scanning and that high speed scanning was being done by that company offsite. It certainly needs to be looked at, but she did not say she knew they were printing ballots.

If they printed them before the election, well that's ok. If they were printing ballots and bringing them in over days, then that's an issue. But she did not know if that's what happened.

No sense in spreading false news.

83
DrCowboyPresident 83 points ago +83 / -0

This makes a complete joke of chain of custody. Let's not mince words here.

44
WaitingOnTheDay 44 points ago +45 / -1

Of course it does. But saying she testified to them printing is false. We don't need to spread false things is all I am saying.

15
veeandy 15 points ago +15 / -0

Also she said that she observed these ballots coming through backdoor regularly till she was there which is Nov 10 th.

25
pepperconchobhar 25 points ago +25 / -0

The ballots were scanned in the facility that she was observing.

If they do ballot printing and scanning, and those ballots were scanned in her building, then what was the ballot printing company doing with 'truckloads' of our ballots after the election?

I do agree with you that we have to be careful with our information, but we have to take care to ask the right questions.

15
WaitingOnTheDay 15 points ago +16 / -1

I understood her to say they were scanned offsite with their high-capacity machines. If the scanning was onsite, then yes, this is a major reveal.

8
Tejas_Pepe 8 points ago +8 / -0

Their website says their high speed sorting machines are used at the vote tally location, not at their own facility.

https://runbeck.net/agilis-ballot-sorting-system/

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
starboard 4 points ago +4 / -0

They print the ballots for Maricopa County. Ballots are sent back to run beck and they participate in the signature verification process for Maricopa too. Source: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_JLyMZfZijY

1
daddydrix [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The article clearly says they print a significant portion of mail ballots for numerous states including AZ, CA, GA, and 19 others.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
31
Duke_Nukem 31 points ago +32 / -1

Reposting from another thread

Wasn't tarrant county big news?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/some-texas-voting-machines-can-t-read-mail-in-ballots-22k-affected-so-far/ar-BB1arKVN

Connected again.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/10/fact-check-false-qanon-claim-trump-watermarked-mail-ballots/6226310002/

"Ballot printers are usually paid per ballot and expected to be able to provide the quantities needed by local governments. Those expectations were especially burdensome this year, Jeff Ellington, president and chief operating officer of Runbeck Election Services, the printing company that produced the most ballots in the country this year, told USA TODAY. Runbeck printed nearly 16 million packets and 35 million ballots, up from 4 million in 2016."

Holy fuck.

26
ReeeeeeFundthePolice 26 points ago +26 / -0

She said they had trucks dropping off ballots, everyday after the election up until she was no longer there which was the 10th

23
MastaJoda 23 points ago +23 / -0

Totally normal to find truck loads of ballots lying around weeks after elections you election gender bigot

7
LockNload 7 points ago +7 / -0

Normally they are backed up to the scanner & tabulator.

22
Duke_Nukem 22 points ago +22 / -0

BEFORE the election

https://www.abc15.com/news/election-2020/is-foreign-interference-truly-a-threat-to-arizona-voters

"Anything on the internet is theoretically a weak spot," said Jeff Ellington, President of Runbeck Election Services. The company partners with the Maricopa County Elections Department to not only print ballots for every election, but process early ballots through several security measures before they're tabulated.

17
blacksmith21 17 points ago +17 / -0

Runbeck CEO is a $ donor to Act Blue, Gabbard and Hussein campaign.

5
EaglesFanInPhx 5 points ago +5 / -0

Where you see that? I looked on opensecrets and only found donations to Printing Industries of America PAC

15
13
Crappydatum 13 points ago +13 / -0

3:21 mark in your video link. They took pictures of the envelopes. I wonder if the lawyers can file suit to see those pictures or if they're "erased" already?

7
Faraday27 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is the kind of request that needs to be shoved in the faces of GEOTUS Trump's team

5
jcpapillon 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good video. At the end, he says the voted ballots are then sent from the county to them, where they are stored in a "vault" (a locked room with a vault decal.)

It sounds like they scan the ballot envelopes and send the images back to the county to match signatures. Then the sealed ballots are shipped to the country to be opened, and counted.

Signature matching is electronic. My understanding is that most states have three envelopes, with the signature on the second. But Arizona (or just Maricopa) has two, and the signature is on the outer one. (this was discussed in the hearing.)

So the process kind-of makes sense - (aside from the fact that they are doing a lot of duplicated effort to make the whole process electronic - I guess more contracts = more graft.)

What does not make sense is that if they are receiving the ballots, sending them to this company, and then doing the electronic signature match,... how the hell do they not know how many they have?

12
Pierce_Butler 12 points ago +12 / -0

From a new post of mine. A list of approved venders for GA in 2019 Runbeck is on the list. https://cviog.uga.edu/_resources/documents/training-and-education/gavreo-conference-documents/vendor-bios.pdf

3
Lyoness 3 points ago +3 / -0

WOW! Just look at those names we can all recognize by now—-including SKYTL and let’s find out who the others are!!!—-is this legit?

10
Ichabod 10 points ago +10 / -0

Raid their servers.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
10
GigEmAgs1876 10 points ago +10 / -0

Per the FEC website, 151/156 political donations by Runbeck employees in 2019-2020 went to ActBlue for various Democrat candidates or directly to Biden's campaign. That's 96.8% by number of contributions, possibly even higher by total value...Those are Biden vote-dump percentages of Democrat-favoritism. They certainly are not an impartial, bias-free actor by even the most cursory search.

https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?contributor_employer=Runbeck&two_year_transaction_period=2020&min_date=01%2F01%2F2019&max_date=12%2F31%2F2020

9
Duke_Nukem 9 points ago +9 / -0

Look into this too

http://somd.com/news/headlines/2014/18748.php

"The Montgomery County Board of Elections also reported that a vendor contracted by the state erroneously sent out a batch of 700 absentee ballots to Baltimore County voters at the beginning of the month.

“Some or all had return envelopes addressed to the Montgomery County election board,” said Montgomery County Election Board Spokeswoman Alysoun McLaughlin.

McLaughlin said the same vendor, Runbeck, sent some Montgomery County voters absentee ballots with Prince Georges County return envelopes in the 2014 primary election. And in the 2012 general election, a number of ballots had to be re-issued in Montgomery because Runbeck sent the wrong ballots to some voters."

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
pepperconchobhar 8 points ago +8 / -0

RUNBECK IS ARIZONA'S OFFICIAL BALLOT PRINTING VENDER

4
WestPalm 4 points ago +4 / -0

Vendor*

7
sir_rockness 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sounds like one of those fuckin chinaman companies on Amazon....

Theres one that makes bike pedals named "Fooker"... wtf?!?!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
milpede0306 6 points ago +6 / -0

autist engaged

6
sperg 6 points ago +6 / -0

another pede found the printer in mi as well

6
daty_dato 6 points ago +6 / -0

What did they offer the Governor post office to get him to push the certification? He won't get the R nomination next cycle.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
keepwinning 6 points ago +6 / -0

Given they had the az contract to print ballots...

6
7
cl99919 7 points ago +8 / -1

https://atlanta.craigslist.org/atl/bfs/d/atlanta-runbeck-sentio-ballot-printing/7227591526.html

"This is a private sale and has nothing to do with the state of Georgia elections. Units are also available in Detriot and Philidelphia."

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
learntocode 5 points ago +5 / -0

Signature verification.

Adversarial ballot counting.

Those two things, which did not occur properly in AZ, GA, MI, WI, and PA, will win the day for Trump.

This ballot printing may have happened, but it wont sway a court in the time frame we have.

1
Harper42190 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup

5
IAmCovfefe 5 points ago +5 / -0

BlueCrest Relia-Vote offers end-to-end solutions for processing both outbound and inbound mail ballots. Relia-Vote uniquely enables high integrity, tracking, monitoring, inbound signature validation, sorting and reporting in an automated, secure solution.

So they’re scanning signatures before delivering them to vote counting centers. Seems like a good place to insert fraudulent ballots.

5
CaptainWinston 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nothing to see here.

Uncle Joe you and Hunter can share the big cell.🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

4
swimmingguy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Investigate!!!

4
MAGA_____bitches 4 points ago +4 / -0

22 days apart? Just another coincidence

4
HiddenDekuScrub 4 points ago +4 / -0

And this is why waiting for the count, in hindsight, was utterly useless.

Ugh... They either really thought they could get away with it no matter how obvious, or they were desperate.

4
dontbanus 4 points ago +4 / -0

MUST BE STICKIED

4
Lyoness 4 points ago +4 / -0

Someone find the ties from Runbeck execs to voting.works (who claims to be a non profit started up in MS——WHI IS BTW doing the GA AUDIT.) They link to their RLA source code is on github. Who knows if that’s truly it tho

Saw they termed up with them from a post on their Twit feed

4
pepperconchobhar 4 points ago +4 / -0

I just heard that. THAT is vital information.

4
Snipes007 4 points ago +4 / -0

Treason!

4
socrates2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who owns it. Break it down to the local level. AZ people must know what handful of printers could do the job. Give us a list.

4
John789 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mods sticky!

3
MagaHippie88 3 points ago +3 / -0

Damn... <3 MAGA2020

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
KAG_FTW 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jan was incredible!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
daddydrix [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

THIS. You know they track those ballots, they admit to it. Wait a second, if their system pairs a ballot and envelope bar code to a person, then who supplies Runbeck with the information of what ballots to print? Like names, addresses, etc?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
BrockCage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Guys i just want to say AZ has mail in balloting down, we been doing it for like 30 years or something crazy. The fact that for SOME REASON we were not done counting our ballots after the election is incredibly suspicious. Normally AZ is done a day later at most. We counted EVERY early mail in ballot and added that number to the count 1 hour after polls closed on election night. Why was there counting after election night?

2
FlamingButBased 2 points ago +2 / -0

Beck better run, indeed.

Helicopter rides in his future.

1
SaladBin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who should this information be sent to?

1
MIKEOBAMA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Run it back, in other words... do it over

1
daddydrix [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Holy shit!!! This blew up! Thank you guys!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1