5404
posted ago by daddydrix ago by daddydrix +5404 / -0

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2020/09/28/runbeck-election-services-prints-ballots-every-election-season/3523196001/

We need to DIG on this company!

Runbeck was name dropped in Jan Bryant's testimony in Arizona. She testified that "Runbeck" was delivering more ballots for days after the election ended.

Update:

Dominion Voting.com and Runbeck.net were registered 22 days a part in 2005 with GoDaddy!

I also uncovered this article naming another company that was "helping". Their domain was registered in 2018. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200923005697/en/BlueCrest-and-Runbeck-Election-Services-Team-up-to-Tackle-Vote-by-Mail-Surge

Comments (76)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
105
WaitingOnTheDay 105 points ago +110 / -5

I think we need to keep a little bit calm. She did not testify that they were printing them. She testified that it was either printing or high speed scanning and that high speed scanning was being done by that company offsite. It certainly needs to be looked at, but she did not say she knew they were printing ballots.

If they printed them before the election, well that's ok. If they were printing ballots and bringing them in over days, then that's an issue. But she did not know if that's what happened.

No sense in spreading false news.

83
DrCowboyPresident 83 points ago +83 / -0

This makes a complete joke of chain of custody. Let's not mince words here.

44
WaitingOnTheDay 44 points ago +45 / -1

Of course it does. But saying she testified to them printing is false. We don't need to spread false things is all I am saying.

15
veeandy 15 points ago +15 / -0

Also she said that she observed these ballots coming through backdoor regularly till she was there which is Nov 10 th.

25
pepperconchobhar 25 points ago +25 / -0

The ballots were scanned in the facility that she was observing.

If they do ballot printing and scanning, and those ballots were scanned in her building, then what was the ballot printing company doing with 'truckloads' of our ballots after the election?

I do agree with you that we have to be careful with our information, but we have to take care to ask the right questions.

15
WaitingOnTheDay 15 points ago +16 / -1

I understood her to say they were scanned offsite with their high-capacity machines. If the scanning was onsite, then yes, this is a major reveal.

8
Tejas_Pepe 8 points ago +8 / -0

Their website says their high speed sorting machines are used at the vote tally location, not at their own facility.

https://runbeck.net/agilis-ballot-sorting-system/

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
starboard 4 points ago +4 / -0

They print the ballots for Maricopa County. Ballots are sent back to run beck and they participate in the signature verification process for Maricopa too. Source: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_JLyMZfZijY

1
daddydrix [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The article clearly says they print a significant portion of mail ballots for numerous states including AZ, CA, GA, and 19 others.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0