My company WAS going to advertise with newsmax... NOPE NOPE NOPE>>... I just pulled the plug.
(media.patriots.win)
☭ Far-Left Media ☭
posted ago by Mainwar
+1887 / -1
Comments (90)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
Front
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Nope, Valerie Jarrett is the first... she is the one coordinating this from the obama's house... remember? She moved in with them.
Valerie Jarrett is a cunt! Had several interactions with her when I worked in DC. Every bad story you hear about that bitch is true!
Please tell us more!
excellent observation. big mike and chimp jarret are totally in on this.
They needed a woman of the house?
I don't like her either but bullets are expensive, are you sure?
Also, they were running that stupid help poor Israelis "charity" so fuck them. "poor starving Israelis" :^) Honk Honk.
I'm before shills defending that it was also ok that the newsmax ceo donated to the clinton foundation, and defended the clinton foundation. That's just what rich people do right shills?
Who made that Podesta meme from The Warriors? Crazy I can't find it. YouTube is trash.
Good to know..i was suspect when the CEO donated to killary in 2016, now i know for sure.. thanks for the heads up!!!
Unbelievable that one can watch several hours of evidence and still write an article claiming no evidence.
Why do we think the author of this piece watched even a single minute of the hearing?
^^^ They simply refuse to look at any evidence, and then say they did not see any evidence
5head lying media moves
"1. Orange man bad.
communism good.
Refer to 1 and 2."
It doesn't matter if they see people admitting on live TV their part in this whole thing and outright saying that they cheated to get Trump out of office. You're not dealing with people that care about truth or what is correct. They are either brainwashed sheep that cannot accept anything else but what the magic box in their living room and pocket tells them or they're communist collaborators and supporters that will do whatever it takes to install that ideology.
They never watched, obviously. Libs are allergic to the truth, they don't want anything to do with it. every media person that is required to cover this stuff probably hate their job because they have to cover the president.
Also of note, this wasn't actually written by Newsmax. From the Copyright at the bottom of the OP's image, Newsmax just printed a piece from the Associated Press.
That makes them no different than drudge report then... so piss on them.
Newsmax called AZ for Biden. https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/999368/18
Time to unsubscribe from these snakes too. They were grifters salvaging Fox's bleeding audience for themselves.
They should know better than to print fake news.
Really, another thread about an ASSOCIATED PRESS article on Newsmax ???????????????
Newsmax shouldn't be using fake news for their sourcing. Relying on AP is a sign of their leanings.
It's right there in the screenshot this time too.
An argument can be made that they shouldn't use AP articles I guess; but it's super common for news sites to do this.
Which is the problem with "journalism" in America.
They either make up fake news, or repeat it. No original investigative content.
Agreed, that is why it is a little shocking so many threads are popping up with people bashing Newsmax for an AP article. Give it time, and as OAN grows, they will no doubt be the same. They all do this. It is $$$$$
The links of the Newsmax CEO to the Clintons and the money he's donated to the Clinton Foundation should be more than enough to demonstrate that they're not our friends.
I first started hearing about Newsmax a few weeks ago and I had a weird feeling they were just bandwagoning to get on the winning team. There's only really one network GEOTUS has been pushing from the start, and that's OANN.
I like OANN but prefer the Epoch Times. I like to read my news rather than have it read to me, I think.
Epoch Times is also consistently based, I find. Zerohedge, TDW, and the chans are also important primary info sources.
OANN has never let me down. Also Chanel is a cute
I feel they assume at any attention is better than none. They try not to pick a side but it's clear they're as uni-party as FOX is now. Bad management and worse executives.
disingenuous fence-sitters are worse than party hacks. with the latter, you at least know where they stand.
Says its from the associated press wire.
You're right - it's just recycled fishwrap from the AP syndication feed. You'd think they'd know better than to use that as filler tho.
OAN doesn't.
this is crazy who wrote it
The Associates Press
Look at the bottom line...
https://www.newsmax.com/headline/election-2020-arizona-certification/2020/11/30/id/999303/
© Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
So they are sellouts who can't even write their own articles.
Nah, using wire news is common for smaller news services who can't afford to write all their own content. They pay AP to be able to do this.
This is worse: https://thedonald.win/p/11Qkx5tcWb/hey-newsmaxyou-just-fucked-us-al/c/
Look at the bottom...
Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Why are they "retweeting" from that garbage?
Meanwhile OAN did 10 HOURS OF UNINTERRUPTED BROADCAST OF THE HEARINGS. No commercials - no talking heads breaking in - no windowing - nothing but a chiron chrawl.
It literally says AP at the bottom of the picture.
Newsmax needs to stop reposting fake news articles, they might as well be fake news at this point, but its not newsmax
"Legal team gathers and submits 8 hours of hard evidence and sworn statements for targeted fraud, but did not provide any evidence of widespread fraud."
This is like having proof that someone committed a few targeted and planned murders, but everyone refuses to prosecute them because they didn't commit WIDESPREAD murder.
"Yeah, but there's 44 others states they didn't kill ANYBODY in... no big deal, still lots of people left"
Serious question, what would they consider evidence? For the mastermind to come forward and Confess? This isn’t a fucking Marvel movie...
You know these people remind me of those kinds of people that whenever they hear something they dont like, they stick their fingers in their ears and say "lalalalalalalalalalalala I cant hear you!!!!"
It's absolutely maddening at this point that these people wont do the right thing for once in their fucking lives and tell the truth.
Newsmax is naming Joe Biden the winner of Arizona and Wisconsin, now that both states certified election results Monday showing he defeated President Donald Trump in the Nov. 3 election.
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/999368/18
Have they responded to that obvious false statement?
"That's a huge slap across the face of Lady American Justice!"
Woman Beater
Don't know why pedes here flocked to Newsmax immediately with OAN, who have proven themselves to be MAGA, waiting in the wings.
I just watched piles of evidence! There are countless examples! Newsmax shit the bed they were trying to snuggle in to. Sucks to be Newsmax when OAN is jumping hurdles and ratings are showing that we appreciate their service. I don't have to have one-sided news to be happy but I sure as hell don't need blatant lies when the public is easing into acceptance.
Controlled opposition
Newsmax cosplays conservative news
Newsmax joins Fox in the fuck off and die category. OANN and RSBN are great though.
I was going to point out that this is an AP article. But the shitbags are calling AZ for Biden. https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/999368/18
Stick with OANN!
Newsmax is controlled opposition. Screw them. RSBN and OAN should get all of our business.
Newsmax is the new faux news . Would be good to see who has equity in newsmax
No evidence of widespread fraud? Can we please get one media network that isn't compromised? Watch the hearings yourself. Listen to the individuals sharing their stories.
Yes, one eyewitness isn't enough evidence. But statistical anamolies, statistical impossibilities, observers being kept at great distances so they couldn't see what was going on, combined with eyewitnesses is more than enough proof to warrant a full audit. This was just one county, right? You really want me to believe they didn't try this shit in other counties and states?
If you say there's no widespread fraud, but aren't denying ANY fraud, the election was unconstitutional. If one legal vote was deliberately destroyed or changed, I don't see how you cannot void all those mail in ballots.
Newsmax is getting praise and support from msnnbcabcnpr etc etc. newsmax is another fox news, controlled opposition
Newsmax sux absolutely.
OANN it is
Newsmax is trying to replace Fox News as controlled opposition, but the stakes are so high they're already starting to cash in on their good will by using their position to turn public opinion. Not gonna work. The fact that OANN is being censored by big tech tells me all I need to know about who to trust for information.
It doesn't need to be widespread to literally upend this election. Which is the point of the four states that stop counting votes.
Why are most journalists completely retarded.
Check out Real America’s Voice app and podcast
"Widespread fraud".. fuck off. Its clear as day.
Yes, they posted it whole, with credit to the AP... instead of writing a blurb on it. Not the first time.
They actually wrote this WHILE RUDY WAS PRESENTING EVIDENCE.
This is an AP story. Don’t slam Newsmax for publishing AP stories. They need to get news from additional sources, like all small publishers. Make them bigger, and they can hire more independent journalists to report the truth.
Tell the name of your company. So ww make up for the lost reach.
Not doxing us, thank you for your support !
So you quoted an article from the AP to take a hit at NewsMax? Huh ?
So you refused to look at the LINK i put in the post to the newsmax website posting the AP article.... without editing the article...
YOUR Point is what exactly? That you presume to attack first and read second?
I guess I am trying to understand what the problem is with NewsMax. They are giving us both sides of the coin and that's a bad thing?
You are butt hurt that they didnt edit the article before posting it to their website? So your echo chamber is shattered? I like that they provided unedited info so I can see what everything my opponent is saying.
Yep. Checks out.
Off I go to unsubscribe from them on youtube.