1:04 = "I think that the biggest fraud in the history of our constitutional republic is taking place right before our eyes"
5:57-7:10 = Explanation of how 'U' votes account for an abnormally high NINETY-FOUR PERCENT correlation. Men and women typically only have a 38% correlation (more explanation in the vid)
7:45 = "I think they're cheating"
9:17-10:35 = Correlation per year group was over 97%
10:36 = "Holy Cow, I think I reverse-engineered the algorithm that they're using to - to do these damn votes. But unless you're willing to create 980,000 buckets, you're going to have a hard time seeing it."
11:06 = Petition to POTUS to have audits of EVERY county in the US after seeing this data
12:06 - 14:28 = Explanation of extrapolation of county growth done before the election and how many people would be of legal voting age.
14:36 = "Voting fraud has been happening in this state and in this nation much longer than the past 4 years"
15:26-15:55 = Explanation of voter turnout calculations
15:58 = In Apache, the change from average turnout during presidential election cycles in past years went from 87% to 99% of all eligible voters in 2020. Doesn't make any sense
19:53 = Rudy asks Piton about validity of numbers that were certified in AZ
20:12 = Piton: "If I were an executive of a publicly-traded company, I would never sign that because I would risk jail time and have all of my money taken in lawsuits... I would never ever have certified. I would rather resign than have certified those results"
20:36 = Piton: "I believe [the numbers are fraudulent] based on the data... I'd be willing to put my life on it, assuming that the data is accurate..."
--
May have missed a few but I've watched it twice. Probably more zingers in this 22 min vid
Wow! I’m not a huge math guy, but I do work in data, and I’ve seen blatant fuckery in every dataset I’ve looked at across the country-weird shit. Not anomalous-just nonsensical, like hundreds of “voters” with DOBs of 1-1-1800.
The Buckets! Man, it’s like a light bulb going off about 1 million lumens! This explains so much. Chop it up and spread it out across outlying demographics where it’s generally buried by noise.
I've only watched it once but I missed what the explanation of what 'correlation' meant. Is talking about turnout or who they voted for, or something else?
They are part of U, but it isn't about gender identity, it's about a big inexplicable blob of voters who are consistent over years in a manner not consistent with groups of known gender.
Some key timestamps:
1:04 = "I think that the biggest fraud in the history of our constitutional republic is taking place right before our eyes"
5:57-7:10 = Explanation of how 'U' votes account for an abnormally high NINETY-FOUR PERCENT correlation. Men and women typically only have a 38% correlation (more explanation in the vid)
7:45 = "I think they're cheating"
9:17-10:35 = Correlation per year group was over 97%
10:36 = "Holy Cow, I think I reverse-engineered the algorithm that they're using to - to do these damn votes. But unless you're willing to create 980,000 buckets, you're going to have a hard time seeing it."
11:06 = Petition to POTUS to have audits of EVERY county in the US after seeing this data
12:06 - 14:28 = Explanation of extrapolation of county growth done before the election and how many people would be of legal voting age.
14:36 = "Voting fraud has been happening in this state and in this nation much longer than the past 4 years"
15:26-15:55 = Explanation of voter turnout calculations
15:58 = In Apache, the change from average turnout during presidential election cycles in past years went from 87% to 99% of all eligible voters in 2020. Doesn't make any sense
19:53 = Rudy asks Piton about validity of numbers that were certified in AZ
20:12 = Piton: "If I were an executive of a publicly-traded company, I would never sign that because I would risk jail time and have all of my money taken in lawsuits... I would never ever have certified. I would rather resign than have certified those results"
20:36 = Piton: "I believe [the numbers are fraudulent] based on the data... I'd be willing to put my life on it, assuming that the data is accurate..."
-- May have missed a few but I've watched it twice. Probably more zingers in this 22 min vid
Wow! I’m not a huge math guy, but I do work in data, and I’ve seen blatant fuckery in every dataset I’ve looked at across the country-weird shit. Not anomalous-just nonsensical, like hundreds of “voters” with DOBs of 1-1-1800. The Buckets! Man, it’s like a light bulb going off about 1 million lumens! This explains so much. Chop it up and spread it out across outlying demographics where it’s generally buried by noise.
I've only watched it once but I missed what the explanation of what 'correlation' meant. Is talking about turnout or who they voted for, or something else?
He is correlating what, with what?
What exactly, is a "U" vote?
There are registered voters who are male.
There are registered voters who are female.
Then there are registered voters who are have an unspecified gender.
They are designated as 'u'.
what about xirs? Did he take xirs into account?
They are part of U, but it isn't about gender identity, it's about a big inexplicable blob of voters who are consistent over years in a manner not consistent with groups of known gender.