Cybersecurity pede here, unfortunately you aren't really proving that he did something with malicious intent here.
I can say that USB thumbdrives, which have self-executing code, are always considered a no-no in the security world, but you HAVE TO GET A FORENSIC IMAGE.
Without the forensic image of that election PC or the laptop, you won't be able to find required artifacts that prove what actions occurred, the video is simply a shot in the dark to say that he was swindling votes.
If I had to guess, it's some tech monkey who needed to put a driver or tool onto the election PC that isn't connected to the internet.
It's definitely bad practice, but I don't think this is a smoking gun unless you can get a forensic image of all hosts involved.
It's a smoking gun with regard to loss of chain of custody. If this isn't documented, those votes must be thrown out.
In addition to that, we already have all the forensic evidence we need to prove fraud - this is just a video to show morons who don't have the iq or attention span for the forensic evidence.
You still need to make a forensic image of the machines involved in order to prove what was done. Sure he broke policy by using thumb drive, but in a court you won't prove votes were swindled without those artifacts showing what was done exactly.
Yeah, I want to be as optimistic as anybody here about Trump's chances or pulling this all off, and I still believe that he will, but this post is kind of a far reach.
Cybersecurity pede here, unfortunately you aren't really proving that he did something with malicious intent here.
I can say that USB thumbdrives, which have self-executing code, are always considered a no-no in the security world, but you HAVE TO GET A FORENSIC IMAGE.
Without the forensic image of that election PC or the laptop, you won't be able to find required artifacts that prove what actions occurred, the video is simply a shot in the dark to say that he was swindling votes.
If I had to guess, it's some tech monkey who needed to put a driver or tool onto the election PC that isn't connected to the internet.
It's definitely bad practice, but I don't think this is a smoking gun unless you can get a forensic image of all hosts involved.
You are retarded, no one should be plugging in USBs in the secure room as if they own the place
This video has garbage quality, and it is in fact lower quality than the video that the capturing device made. Why was it uploaded in low quality?
It's a smoking gun with regard to loss of chain of custody. If this isn't documented, those votes must be thrown out.
In addition to that, we already have all the forensic evidence we need to prove fraud - this is just a video to show morons who don't have the iq or attention span for the forensic evidence.
You still need to make a forensic image of the machines involved in order to prove what was done. Sure he broke policy by using thumb drive, but in a court you won't prove votes were swindled without those artifacts showing what was done exactly.
This
Yeah, I want to be as optimistic as anybody here about Trump's chances or pulling this all off, and I still believe that he will, but this post is kind of a far reach.