Cybersecurity pede here, unfortunately you aren't really proving that he did something with malicious intent here.
I can say that USB thumbdrives, which have self-executing code, are always considered a no-no in the security world, but you HAVE TO GET A FORENSIC IMAGE.
Without the forensic image of that election PC or the laptop, you won't be able to find required artifacts that prove what actions occurred, the video is simply a shot in the dark to say that he was swindling votes.
If I had to guess, it's some tech monkey who needed to put a driver or tool onto the election PC that isn't connected to the internet.
It's definitely bad practice, but I don't think this is a smoking gun unless you can get a forensic image of all hosts involved.
Cybersecurity pede here, unfortunately you aren't really proving that he did something with malicious intent here.
I can say that USB thumbdrives, which have self-executing code, are always considered a no-no in the security world, but you HAVE TO GET A FORENSIC IMAGE.
Without the forensic image of that election PC or the laptop, you won't be able to find required artifacts that prove what actions occurred, the video is simply a shot in the dark to say that he was swindling votes.
If I had to guess, it's some tech monkey who needed to put a driver or tool onto the election PC that isn't connected to the internet.
It's definitely bad practice, but I don't think this is a smoking gun unless you can get a forensic image of all hosts involved.
This video has garbage quality, and it is in fact lower quality than the video that the capturing device made. Why was it uploaded in low quality?