The number of absentee mail-in votes counted should not be greater than the number of absentee mail-in ballots marked as successfully received in the record (over-count). Conversely, the number of votes should not be less than the number of absentee mail-in ballots marked as successfully received in the record (under-count).
By analyzing vote counts and absentee ballots marked returned for each precinct in Georgia, an estimated 14,683 mail-in ballots do not make mathematical sense.
Of those, an estimated 8,452 mail-in ballots were over-counted. The mail-in ballots for these precincts split for Trump/Biden at 30/70 – a 40 point difference.
An estimated 6,231 mail-in ballots were under-counted. The mail-in ballots for these precincts split for Trump/Biden at 45/55 – a 10 point difference.
Throwing away the under-counted at a 10 point diff and replacing with over-counted at 40 point diff is a 30 point swing for Biden!
If Shiva and his top notch math buddies say its fraud--its fraud.
This is where circumstantial evidence is so powerful. They look at a data trail, the aftermath, and explain why its a crime and not a bizarre 'natural' event.
There's a video where they show that a data graph is impossible; and that the only explanation for its trajectory at certain points is the action of an 'artificial mechanism' (i.e an algorithm).
A Judge and jury would believe these guys--they're academics with multiple degrees and high level positions at the best universities (i.e MITetc). Shiva, of course, is the inventor of email. Huge kudos.
Lol. Account that's 19 minutes old.
Begone shill.
So its important enough for you to join up and plant some disinfo. Instantly?
Stop infighting. Shiva made a mistake in his first analysis. The fraud is there but it's not that easy to find.
Unlike Shiva I am the real thing. I specialise in things like data analysis, auditing, cheating in competitive systems, etc.
Resume and proof of actually being an expert (journalists are not experts, titles are not experts, certificates to not identify experts, only demonstrating expertise identifies experts):
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8c5qCff/x/c/1BjYf4thsC
Unfortunately I'm not in the USA so there's only so much I can help, the full data will be a data breach.
We need to continue the hunt but mistakes and false positives happen. It's good to challenge things, to be sceptical, ensure quality and certainty while still seeking for the truth (we need to know no that's it then keep looking) but the enemy would love to have us fighting each other.
The mistake Shiva made is problematic as it poisons the well. It may be an accident but either way it's not an excuse to stop looking.
When the margin of winning is just a percent or less then fraud might not show up so easily. You need a 10000X zoom and Shiva's work is at 10X zoom. You're likely to only find false positives at that resolution but good on him for at least trying. You have to start somewhere.
Most fraud started the moment they issued the ballots sending them out to anyone. There's probably not so much up the pipeline but check anyway.
How did he make a mistake?
Normally when you do a graph you have something like X = A, Y = B. He accidentally did something that makes it Y = X.
For the data plotted you would not expect to see much relation between A and B but because he accidentally made something the equivalent of A = B he forced a relation.
Specifically he did Y = B - X. That will make any data set slant down at a linear horizontal 45 degree angle.
He crossed the wires. Failed to properly separate the axis's.
Play: http://jsfiddle.net/j186rLtp/1/
All you do is write some code and say "omg my brain gave out a fart, try thus code line" and you claim that you are comparable to Shiva? Stfu. Do a real scientific attempt instead. Science is what matters, not stupid reversing based on eyes and "omg maybe I find something if I stress myself into this blindly!!!"
Why don't you run the code and see what it does?
The code IS science. What kind of an idiot given a comment to the scientific method being practised screams science is what matters? Are you being sarcastic or something?
Tell me, what the hell is this science you speak of? I'm tired of you leftists screaming science this science that science the other when you don't even know what it means.
Your comment shows that you're not qualified to comment.
If you can't work out the most basic plotting error like someone adding - x to the function for Y then you're an idiot.
The left don't know science. They say they discovered life on another planet but won't call a fetus life...
Well, without getting into the nitty gritty, Gawker Media had to cough up $750,000 (defamation) for saying/suggesting the same things you're saying.
A simple Wiki search.....
Btw, are you Jewish?
https://www.inventorofemail.com/
oh wikipedia why didn't I think of that! /s
Al Gore just flew over my tranny discord!
Dude is a professor at the most acclaimed tech focused college in the WORLD.
Pretty sure he knows a thing a two. Clearly more than you. So who's word am I going to take? The guy who has a Phd from MIT? Or you, who's done nothing worth even deriding?
I think he did invent email?
He's only got like 4 degrees from MIT... WTF does he know???
/s obviously
30 to 100 is not same as 130/100 as per Shiva's slide.
Shiva said 100% - 130% = -30% for Trump.
I'm seeing a +30% swing to Biden.
Please contact him directly and correlate your evidence with him. I'm sure he will appreciate at least seeing your analysis. Math never lies.
Random people could have some issue in their thought process (it is very sad I know) that makes them not understand Shiva's work.
They brought in fake absentee ballots in Fulton County (and possibly did away with real ones). The circumstantial evidence is clear as day.
By 5pm on Nov 3, they had counted 86,000 of the 146,000 absentee ballots in Fulton County. By their own admission, they counted ballots until 10:30pm. The next morning at 11am, the SOS made a public statement that 67,000 absentee ballots still remained in Fulton county. IMPOSSIBLE!!
Additionally!!!! They had 16,000 ballots RECEIVED on election day (I included this number in the 146,000 total). The two weeks leadying up to the election, they received 2,500-3,000 absentee ballots per day. I have no way to explain how that number would jump to 16,000 on election day....(this implies 16,000 absentee ballots dropped off in drop boxes on election day!) It's a scam! They saw they were behind and they brought in 10,000+ ballots for Biden.
I've posted this here: https://thedonald.win/p/11QSGyVkVo/fulton-county-timeline---impossi/
I can also confirm from the recod that Fulton County had by far the most over-counts of any county from my analysis.
Running a different analysis I also found 30% of ballots switched from Tump to Biden in NYC.