Communist Coercive Methods For Eliciting Individual Compliance
(media.patriots.win)
🛑 Corrupt Commies 🛑
Comments (426)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
What does that have to do with 5g, though? I'm a telecom guy who's been redpilled for decades, 5g is just a shorter range broadcast method with more available bandwidth.
Older technologies have been bombarding us with radio waves since before most of us were born; every time I see people making specific claims about 5g, it's things that could also be done with older tech.
If you know about 5G then you know that it's at the wavelength that interacts with human tissue using sweat as a medium and no one actually knows what that will do to humans because testing for what effect that would have was cancelled once that issue was found out early on.
Older tech couldn't do that because it wasn't at the wavelength necessary for that. No one I ever bring that up to can answer me. The most I get are nervous laughs and a change of subject. They don't question it, they don't try to tell me I'm wrong, they just try and laugh it off. THAT is what scares me about 5G, not that it's part of some conspiracy to track everyone. That there may be a massive health issue that people are laughing off because they don't even know what will happen.
5G equipment can work on two different sets of wavelengths. UHF, which is heavily used by other things like cell phones, wifi, tvs, etc, and EHF, AKA millimeter wave, which is already used in airport security scanners, police radar guns, satellite communications, and some higher speed wi fi. So you're likely getting hit by that wavelength already, especially if you fly often.
Besides, I'd always heard that it was the extremely low frequency broadcasts that really mess with people. Stuff like HAARP.
VW - exactly. And regarding RFID tech, how small are current gen chips? Oh, we don't know? So, let's look at how small it was at last press release. Hitachi: 0.15 x 0.15 millimeters in size and 7.5 micrometers thick in 2006. Compare width of a circuit connection back then vs now. It's like 20x smaller, so why can't RFID chips be AT LEAST 10x smaller now? Here's an article that asserts 1 in 3 Americans have already been tagged: https://thegoodlylawfulsociety.org/study-finds-1-3-americans-implanted-rfid-chips-unaware/
There are folks out there that describe how to assemble a device that pulses a magnetic field - the objective of this is to induce a sufficiently large current (which doesn't need to be all that big for sub nano connections) within tiny circuit connections that fries them - oops!
RFID sizes are more about the coil which must be used to not only pick up energy for power but also modulate the field to transmit data back to the transceiver.
RFID card, the coil typically goes around the whole outside of the card. Pet ID chips (which is probably what Gates is talking about) have a very small coil but the range is extremely limited (which is why they are typically placed in a standard place on a pet).
I'm not technology literate like you are fren...I'm not really sure how that would come into play. I just know about the Bill Gates thing from digging and reading. Is there a way 5G can pick up RFID signals? They could pinpoint you in a crowd possibly.
Think of an RFID chip like a tiny mirror with a message written on it. If you hit it with a signal on the wavelength it was made to work with, the signal bounces back to you and you can read the message.
Sure, you could use 5g, but RFID chips typically carry a very small amount of data; the proposed Gates 666 chips would only really need to hold an ID number that they can look up in a database to find the rest of your info, like those chips you can get implanted in your pet to find them if they run away.
The main advantage of 5g is that it can carry a large amount of data, so that would just be a waste of money for something that only needs to hold an ID#. Especially if you wanted to scan a crowd, you'd want something longer ranged.
No. 5g is a more efficient way to transmit data, not a significant bump in transmit power. RFID devices are unpowered, so their primary limitation is how much power they can reflect, and 5g doesn't really change this.
But if you are in a crowd, and someone pumps up the power and uses a highly directional antennae like a parabolic dish, they might be able to pinpoint you. This has been the case for awhile and has nothing to do with 5g.