6718
Comments (426)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
InRevelation12now 7 points ago +7 / -0

Trollin - I agree. Add one thing to what you said. Routine diagnostic procedures in hospitals is reduced which affects their bottom line. Meanwhile, deaths attributed to COVID receive 20% more $ from medicare. So, what do hospitals do? Any death that can possibly be attributed to COVID is so attributed in order to help keep the hospital in business.

In other words, the DS has literally made it financially beneficial to lie. Simpletons like me call it a bribe.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Blinker-Aerospace7 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm extremely curious what numbers would have looked like in the past if we applied the same amount of testing and death attributions to the flu

4
InRevelation12now 4 points ago +4 / -0

Me too. Prior to COVID, flu deaths in the 60-100k range caused zero alarm in this country. Ppl didn't even notice. Check recent history.

What changed other than the MSM/Globalist/DemonkkkRat agenda to oust Trump and flip this country to socialism/communism? Nothing - many other countries being flipped too. (Don't forget that 5 govenors decided it should be mandatory to ship convalescing flu patients to nursing homes - NY, MI, NJ, CA & PA - can't have a pandemic without deaths to point at, now can we?)

We had the flu, with medium seasonal flu death rate - transmission rates maybe higher than normal - maybe. That's as far as I'm willing to go. False positive #s built-into PCR test such that it cannot detect when it's over. What is happening right now is normal seasonal flu as well. One small dead fragment of a corona virus multiplied 1 trillion times or more in order to trigger a positive result does not mean a person is sick. Not reporting the number of cycles a PCR runs is leaving out important information. Multiplication factor = 2^(# of amplification cycles). Rule of thumb SHOULD be anything over 35 is totally unreliable. (That's 34 billion)