6718
Comments (426)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
Blinker-Aerospace7 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm extremely curious what numbers would have looked like in the past if we applied the same amount of testing and death attributions to the flu

4
InRevelation12now 4 points ago +4 / -0

Me too. Prior to COVID, flu deaths in the 60-100k range caused zero alarm in this country. Ppl didn't even notice. Check recent history.

What changed other than the MSM/Globalist/DemonkkkRat agenda to oust Trump and flip this country to socialism/communism? Nothing - many other countries being flipped too. (Don't forget that 5 govenors decided it should be mandatory to ship convalescing flu patients to nursing homes - NY, MI, NJ, CA & PA - can't have a pandemic without deaths to point at, now can we?)

We had the flu, with medium seasonal flu death rate - transmission rates maybe higher than normal - maybe. That's as far as I'm willing to go. False positive #s built-into PCR test such that it cannot detect when it's over. What is happening right now is normal seasonal flu as well. One small dead fragment of a corona virus multiplied 1 trillion times or more in order to trigger a positive result does not mean a person is sick. Not reporting the number of cycles a PCR runs is leaving out important information. Multiplication factor = 2^(# of amplification cycles). Rule of thumb SHOULD be anything over 35 is totally unreliable. (That's 34 billion)