Remember this deagel prediction of 80% population decrease by 2025? What if this was basically their plan, had we not gotten the 2016 and 2020 elections. Under Hillary our economy would continue downwards and China would be propelled to number one.
Just remembered this from a few years back and it all makes sense now.
I didn't mean this specific article (should have been more clear.) I just searched out something on the topic of the deagle prediction to post and picked this article (without actually reading it.)
What it's about is a military contractor that provides estimates in population variance, etc. and estimated a few years ago that US population would be somewhere around 60 million by 2025. Obviously this turned many heads, since the population now is somewhere over 320 million. Since the agency that did this has deep ties to military/intelligence systems, the prediction made the rounds because of how extremely unusual it was on face value. No reputable company would make that kind of prediction without more info than they attributed it to.
Considering what we've seen now, I think it's a little more clear as to what was behind the prediction.
Remember this deagel prediction of 80% population decrease by 2025? What if this was basically their plan, had we not gotten the 2016 and 2020 elections. Under Hillary our economy would continue downwards and China would be propelled to number one.
Just remembered this from a few years back and it all makes sense now.
I didn't mean this specific article (should have been more clear.) I just searched out something on the topic of the deagle prediction to post and picked this article (without actually reading it.)
What it's about is a military contractor that provides estimates in population variance, etc. and estimated a few years ago that US population would be somewhere around 60 million by 2025. Obviously this turned many heads, since the population now is somewhere over 320 million. Since the agency that did this has deep ties to military/intelligence systems, the prediction made the rounds because of how extremely unusual it was on face value. No reputable company would make that kind of prediction without more info than they attributed it to.
Considering what we've seen now, I think it's a little more clear as to what was behind the prediction.