Homeschool is SKYROCKETING! Hold the line parents! This is the chance to raise your kids the way YOU want them raised!!! This THIS** is the silver lining to this dark cloud!
Is it? Cause it feels like I’m going to continue to pay school “property” tax, hell my kindergartener just got a chromebook, can’t use the playground, library, gym or cafeteria, but yeah our district bought every kid a Chinese virtual teacher for Christmas. I will find a way, but I like my career, I sacrificed half of it when I had my child and went to part-time, now I’ll probably quit to homeschool, as my peer group reeeeee’s on about social interaction, fuck I’m so done with this logic!
Trump's directive for his next term is school choice. Once people get paid to home school, it's game over for public school, as it should be. Public school is one of the worst things to have happened to western socities.
I agree and I love him for this!!! But I’m in Cuomolini land, it’s gonna get a little worse before it gets better. I could have opted to send my child to catholic or private school and paid out of pocket, but we’ve already seen common core infect those schools. And I knew they would cancel and close those schools, (because 2nd wave, omg) just as fast as they are canceling and closing public school now. I told my friends not to waste their money on private schools, now they’re closing first, cause numbers...I’m annoyed because I never planned on being a homeschool parent, which is funny cause I’m a child of teachers, so I might be a little suited for it... I also like my current career, seems like a lot of teacher jobs will be lost to parents now, I’m ok with that I guess?, will just learn this new position as best as I can.
Yes, parents, women specifically, assuming the role of teacher for children and thus staying home and assuming a housewife role, is much better for the nuclear family which is better for the outcome of society all around. Women as economic equals to men and letting the State nurture children instead of the mother + husband (support for providing), by putting kids in school + daycare has been wrecking havoc on our society in numerous ways. Women with economics value => men, means the masculine influence has been drowned out because women have used their new power, along with the State's oppression of men to force a feminine influence in society + children, which has led to less discipline (psychology where being strict with kids = bad so parents believe they should let anything go and be nice). This is how you end up with entitled 25yos that want everything given to them for free and have never faced a consequence for a bad decision their whole life etc... With the technology available at kids disposal, it's even more important now more than ever that parents spend more time with their children not less. Having both parents work 40+ hours a week to advance a career means hardly any time for the kids. Both parents are tired when they get home. No one acts as support to the other partner and that's not good because it hurts a child's development since the parents aren't readily available. All so what? So the parents can buy nicer cars and go traveling twice a year?
The current family dynamic and relationship dynamics in our culture doesn't lead to a good outcome. Removing public education and lowering taxes would go a long way to helping improve relationship dynamics, improve parenting, improve morality and improve the outcome of children in our society. Not to mention, it's a direct counter to the government indoctrination.
That is what Trump intended and that's exactly what should happen. Truthfully, education has long passed the point that the government even needs to be involved. Private schools are easy to setup. There is 0 reason there is a public school in existence but since that's a hard pill for people to swallow, allowing the money to follow the student would be a good interim situation until we abolish public schools.
So does my husband get a raise once I stop working, cause I like everything you are saying, but I’m mid-40’s and I was raised thinking I could have a career and be a mom, my mom did it, my husband’s mom did it, we come from dual income families and I like money! I like having and earning my own money too! I also like the personal achievements and rewards I receive from having a career. Do I get the same salary that a teacher receives when I homeschool?
I’m not against anything you are saying here, but I’m almost mid-life here what you’re calling for is a dramatic role reversal of decades of programming.
If public education wasn't a thing and people home schooled then taxes would be lower. This effectively gives a raise to your husband.
Also, here's another thing. Imagine there are 4 jobs in society. Two that pay 100,000/yr and two that pay $40,000/yr. As it stands right now due to "equality", a man would get one of the $100,000/yr jobs and a woman would get one. There's nothing to say it's split evenly. In reality, people tend to marry into their class. That means you'll have two families, one earning $80k/yr and one earning $200k/yr. In a society where only men get the good jobs, you actually end up with more evenly split where the two men get each of the $100k/yr job. Imagine trying to raise a family on $40k/yr? Not happening. On $100k/yr it's possible. When women take a step-back in their economic contribution, it actually would improve your husbands salary because there would be more better jobs available for him. Right now, other women are taking his jobs and that value isn't necessarily going to you. Essentially, less women working means less competition for men in the working world. The end result is actually a better outcome for average families. The upper classes + single women lose out the most, which is actually a better outcome for society. Having incentive for single women to marry men is a good thing and who cares about disadvantaging the elite.
Also, if you think there isn't implicit value in homeschooling vs. working, you're part of the problem, no offense. The idea that there's achievements/rewards in working for the State or a corporation is most definitely programming. The goal of working is to provide for a family not to provide independence to not need a man in your life or some sort of self-achievement. Remember, you can still do everything you want to do when you aren't reliant on a salary and in fact you can do it better. Want to teach? Start your own school in your spare time. No one should labour for the State or a capitalist if they don't need to nor should anyone feel compelled to want to do that.
Money doesn't buy happiness and there's a lot more to gain in a family by having a mother not work than there is in having one work. Most people have way too many material things which money buys but most people are sorely lacking in their spiritual and emotional needs, which working prevents one from attaining.
If you can do both great but I almost all but guarantee, you'd be better off not working rather than working. Any woman I've known or read about who has ever pulled herself out of the requirement of working to pursue a homemaker lifestyle has typically always had great results in doing so. The only time women need to stop this lifestyle is when the man is unable to provide for her which is not desirable but unfortunate circumstances happen. If a woman is so materialistic that she needs to work to meet her material desires then that's a whole problem of its own and it's not a good outcome.
Agree, my taxes would be 6K lower a year if public schools were not a thing.
Also agree, people marry into their class, as my husband and I make relative equal incomes, we are however in very different fields, he in transportation, and being a mechanical engineer, me in advertising being an art director. Thing is though, I wouldn't take a job from his field, he works with 98% men. I too work in a male dominated field, though more like 65%. But we equally bring in the same amount of revenue and have moved up in our fields accordingly and at the same time, good luck or family motivation/support - IDK? Maybe should have become a teacher like my mom, I would get a nice salary today and could sit home and teach a class of 30 online, while I homeschool my child right next to me? - Female teachers are over 85%, guess I should have gone that route?
As far as programming for rewards, no I take no offense to your statement, there is certainly more to life then being parent, right? I should be first a wife, a spouse, before I consider such challenges... work is the filler, icing on the cake, do you want to go tell Kayleigh Mcenany that she should quit her job cause she's not MOM enough, how about Sidney Powell, nooooooo, let your husband make the money.....
I do think there is a value in homeschooling, but there is also value in public and private schooling. Schools bring in community and pride, team sports, math and debate teams, music and art, I've met the best people though schooling.
I have no material desires, I love being a mother, it was a biological call for me!!! but I do like working, I like having multiple passions, and despite what you think you know about women or even men, I'm pretty sure my husband is A-OK with me having my own opinions and desires and knows he's my partner not care-taker... IDK, but that's how we're doing it over here.
For what's it's worth, we're older, and have only one child, we're raising him to care for himself first and his family if he so has one..... but we won't shun a future girlfriend if she wants to get a job ;)
Fauci is a worthless idiot, from day 1 he has done nothing but create confusion and Trump had to take the blame, he needs to cut him lose. World will be much better place once he stops wasting oxygen.
He's been worthless sense the 80's when he killed everyone with AIDS. Pretty sure the President doesn't have authority over the NIAID or he would of been fired decades ago. Same snake, same gross incompetence for decades now.
He also had his hands in the wuhan lab that released this thing, giving them funding directly for gain of function research on sars like bat coronavirus' because it's illegal to do that in the US now.
You see that? Joe Biden isn't even in office yet (he won't be), and he's already solving the pandemic! Schools are back open, it's a new day! Thank you Democrat leadership! You guys are much better at handling pandemics than the bad orange man.
All it would take is a snap of his fingers. Creates a legacy for himself of being the savior. Then gets out of the way for Kamala 6-12 months in or as late as the 2022 folections.
A war with China is becoming less avoidable by the day, and democrats refuse to open their eyes to that threat or they have been paid to keep them shut.
Besides Fauci being an absolute FRAUD, I'm somewhat intrigued by this. He was all bold and anti-Trump when Biden "won" the election, but now he seems to be toning down his rhetoric, as if he knows that President Trump has things "under control" and Sleepy Joe isn't going to be President...
Sniveling cowards such as him should be kept an eye on, as they are generally indicators of the meta-game, as their sense of self-preservation tends to kick in. If he thought for a moment that Biden was actually going to get into the White House, he'd wouldn't say anything that could be favorable for President Trump.
My kids school board is full of scaredy-cats and COVID pearl clutchers! They have closed the school right before Thanksgiving and justified it by saying behavior on Halloween made cases rise and the concern over people getting together for Thanksgiving. Meanwhile the neighboring school district is 100% open. PA just made the districts commit to follow the health department recommendations, essentially makes the the recommendations the law. Meanwhile sports are 100% open. Crazy!
If you have children in schools that are controlled by the unions, you’re children are not going back to school anytime soon.
Schools aren’t controlled by administrators or the school board. They are controlled by the union. The union controls the school board and the school board controls the administrators that make the decision of when to reopen.
Yeah. So the can indoctrinate and vaccinate without parent’s involved
Vaccines dont sell themselves
Homeschool is SKYROCKETING! Hold the line parents! This is the chance to raise your kids the way YOU want them raised!!! This THIS** is the silver lining to this dark cloud!
Is it? Cause it feels like I’m going to continue to pay school “property” tax, hell my kindergartener just got a chromebook, can’t use the playground, library, gym or cafeteria, but yeah our district bought every kid a Chinese virtual teacher for Christmas. I will find a way, but I like my career, I sacrificed half of it when I had my child and went to part-time, now I’ll probably quit to homeschool, as my peer group reeeeee’s on about social interaction, fuck I’m so done with this logic!
Trump's directive for his next term is school choice. Once people get paid to home school, it's game over for public school, as it should be. Public school is one of the worst things to have happened to western socities.
I agree and I love him for this!!! But I’m in Cuomolini land, it’s gonna get a little worse before it gets better. I could have opted to send my child to catholic or private school and paid out of pocket, but we’ve already seen common core infect those schools. And I knew they would cancel and close those schools, (because 2nd wave, omg) just as fast as they are canceling and closing public school now. I told my friends not to waste their money on private schools, now they’re closing first, cause numbers...I’m annoyed because I never planned on being a homeschool parent, which is funny cause I’m a child of teachers, so I might be a little suited for it... I also like my current career, seems like a lot of teacher jobs will be lost to parents now, I’m ok with that I guess?, will just learn this new position as best as I can.
Yes, parents, women specifically, assuming the role of teacher for children and thus staying home and assuming a housewife role, is much better for the nuclear family which is better for the outcome of society all around. Women as economic equals to men and letting the State nurture children instead of the mother + husband (support for providing), by putting kids in school + daycare has been wrecking havoc on our society in numerous ways. Women with economics value => men, means the masculine influence has been drowned out because women have used their new power, along with the State's oppression of men to force a feminine influence in society + children, which has led to less discipline (psychology where being strict with kids = bad so parents believe they should let anything go and be nice). This is how you end up with entitled 25yos that want everything given to them for free and have never faced a consequence for a bad decision their whole life etc... With the technology available at kids disposal, it's even more important now more than ever that parents spend more time with their children not less. Having both parents work 40+ hours a week to advance a career means hardly any time for the kids. Both parents are tired when they get home. No one acts as support to the other partner and that's not good because it hurts a child's development since the parents aren't readily available. All so what? So the parents can buy nicer cars and go traveling twice a year?
The current family dynamic and relationship dynamics in our culture doesn't lead to a good outcome. Removing public education and lowering taxes would go a long way to helping improve relationship dynamics, improve parenting, improve morality and improve the outcome of children in our society. Not to mention, it's a direct counter to the government indoctrination.
Schools receive money based on per-pupil costs. Seems to me if a family home schooled, it should receive that money. It's only fair.
That is what Trump intended and that's exactly what should happen. Truthfully, education has long passed the point that the government even needs to be involved. Private schools are easy to setup. There is 0 reason there is a public school in existence but since that's a hard pill for people to swallow, allowing the money to follow the student would be a good interim situation until we abolish public schools.
So does my husband get a raise once I stop working, cause I like everything you are saying, but I’m mid-40’s and I was raised thinking I could have a career and be a mom, my mom did it, my husband’s mom did it, we come from dual income families and I like money! I like having and earning my own money too! I also like the personal achievements and rewards I receive from having a career. Do I get the same salary that a teacher receives when I homeschool?
I’m not against anything you are saying here, but I’m almost mid-life here what you’re calling for is a dramatic role reversal of decades of programming.
If public education wasn't a thing and people home schooled then taxes would be lower. This effectively gives a raise to your husband.
Also, here's another thing. Imagine there are 4 jobs in society. Two that pay 100,000/yr and two that pay $40,000/yr. As it stands right now due to "equality", a man would get one of the $100,000/yr jobs and a woman would get one. There's nothing to say it's split evenly. In reality, people tend to marry into their class. That means you'll have two families, one earning $80k/yr and one earning $200k/yr. In a society where only men get the good jobs, you actually end up with more evenly split where the two men get each of the $100k/yr job. Imagine trying to raise a family on $40k/yr? Not happening. On $100k/yr it's possible. When women take a step-back in their economic contribution, it actually would improve your husbands salary because there would be more better jobs available for him. Right now, other women are taking his jobs and that value isn't necessarily going to you. Essentially, less women working means less competition for men in the working world. The end result is actually a better outcome for average families. The upper classes + single women lose out the most, which is actually a better outcome for society. Having incentive for single women to marry men is a good thing and who cares about disadvantaging the elite.
Also, if you think there isn't implicit value in homeschooling vs. working, you're part of the problem, no offense. The idea that there's achievements/rewards in working for the State or a corporation is most definitely programming. The goal of working is to provide for a family not to provide independence to not need a man in your life or some sort of self-achievement. Remember, you can still do everything you want to do when you aren't reliant on a salary and in fact you can do it better. Want to teach? Start your own school in your spare time. No one should labour for the State or a capitalist if they don't need to nor should anyone feel compelled to want to do that.
Money doesn't buy happiness and there's a lot more to gain in a family by having a mother not work than there is in having one work. Most people have way too many material things which money buys but most people are sorely lacking in their spiritual and emotional needs, which working prevents one from attaining.
If you can do both great but I almost all but guarantee, you'd be better off not working rather than working. Any woman I've known or read about who has ever pulled herself out of the requirement of working to pursue a homemaker lifestyle has typically always had great results in doing so. The only time women need to stop this lifestyle is when the man is unable to provide for her which is not desirable but unfortunate circumstances happen. If a woman is so materialistic that she needs to work to meet her material desires then that's a whole problem of its own and it's not a good outcome.
Agree, my taxes would be 6K lower a year if public schools were not a thing.
Also agree, people marry into their class, as my husband and I make relative equal incomes, we are however in very different fields, he in transportation, and being a mechanical engineer, me in advertising being an art director. Thing is though, I wouldn't take a job from his field, he works with 98% men. I too work in a male dominated field, though more like 65%. But we equally bring in the same amount of revenue and have moved up in our fields accordingly and at the same time, good luck or family motivation/support - IDK? Maybe should have become a teacher like my mom, I would get a nice salary today and could sit home and teach a class of 30 online, while I homeschool my child right next to me? - Female teachers are over 85%, guess I should have gone that route?
As far as programming for rewards, no I take no offense to your statement, there is certainly more to life then being parent, right? I should be first a wife, a spouse, before I consider such challenges... work is the filler, icing on the cake, do you want to go tell Kayleigh Mcenany that she should quit her job cause she's not MOM enough, how about Sidney Powell, nooooooo, let your husband make the money.....
I do think there is a value in homeschooling, but there is also value in public and private schooling. Schools bring in community and pride, team sports, math and debate teams, music and art, I've met the best people though schooling.
Money doesn't buy happiness, it buys bread! - Don't forget it!
I have no material desires, I love being a mother, it was a biological call for me!!! but I do like working, I like having multiple passions, and despite what you think you know about women or even men, I'm pretty sure my husband is A-OK with me having my own opinions and desires and knows he's my partner not care-taker... IDK, but that's how we're doing it over here.
For what's it's worth, we're older, and have only one child, we're raising him to care for himself first and his family if he so has one..... but we won't shun a future girlfriend if she wants to get a job ;)
My son is 2...I’m in a scary position at the moment and looking forward...no fucking way he goes to a public school though.
I don’t trust a word Fauci says. He has to have a nefarious angle he’s playing if he’s stating the truth.
Fauci is a worthless idiot, from day 1 he has done nothing but create confusion and Trump had to take the blame, he needs to cut him lose. World will be much better place once he stops wasting oxygen.
He's been worthless sense the 80's when he killed everyone with AIDS. Pretty sure the President doesn't have authority over the NIAID or he would of been fired decades ago. Same snake, same gross incompetence for decades now.
Or it could've been a bunch of degenerate faggots having sex that caused aids to soar. Still Fauci needs a helicopter ride
He also had his hands in the wuhan lab that released this thing, giving them funding directly for gain of function research on sars like bat coronavirus' because it's illegal to do that in the US now.
Fuck Fox
Why is Trump tweeting Fox News?
Yes we do. Everybody does, but politics is imperfect.
He'll just change his statement again in a few days when it goes with the current narrative...
You see that? Joe Biden isn't even in office yet (he won't be), and he's already solving the pandemic! Schools are back open, it's a new day! Thank you Democrat leadership! You guys are much better at handling pandemics than the bad orange man.
All it would take is a snap of his fingers. Creates a legacy for himself of being the savior. Then gets out of the way for Kamala 6-12 months in or as late as the 2022 folections.
I don't give a wretching damn what Fauci thinks about anything.
A war with China is becoming less avoidable by the day, and democrats refuse to open their eyes to that threat or they have been paid to keep them shut.
Faucii is consistently wrong ....
Just like he's right about Election fraud.
Fuck you Fox News.
There's been a few problems with the "data." Mr. Fauci may not have heard.
He also said keep the bars closed. I'm a single guy with no kids so... Shit, lol.
Theybare concerned the kids won't get brainwashed at home.
Homeschooling is best not indoctrination by CCP agenda
So biden cheats to get to 270 and suddenly lockdowns are no longer the solution. How expected.
Kilmeade sucks. Fuck that guy. Fuck Fox news. Have to stop giving these snowflakes our clicks.
This is not the first time Fauci said kids should return to schools. Libtard governors will continue to close schools. Nothing new here.
Besides Fauci being an absolute FRAUD, I'm somewhat intrigued by this. He was all bold and anti-Trump when Biden "won" the election, but now he seems to be toning down his rhetoric, as if he knows that President Trump has things "under control" and Sleepy Joe isn't going to be President...
Sniveling cowards such as him should be kept an eye on, as they are generally indicators of the meta-game, as their sense of self-preservation tends to kick in. If he thought for a moment that Biden was actually going to get into the White House, he'd wouldn't say anything that could be favorable for President Trump.
My kids school board is full of scaredy-cats and COVID pearl clutchers! They have closed the school right before Thanksgiving and justified it by saying behavior on Halloween made cases rise and the concern over people getting together for Thanksgiving. Meanwhile the neighboring school district is 100% open. PA just made the districts commit to follow the health department recommendations, essentially makes the the recommendations the law. Meanwhile sports are 100% open. Crazy!
Nice proper use of punctuation.
If you have children in schools that are controlled by the unions, you’re children are not going back to school anytime soon.
Schools aren’t controlled by administrators or the school board. They are controlled by the union. The union controls the school board and the school board controls the administrators that make the decision of when to reopen.
These decisions have no basis in science.