I think she is right. Did anyone bother looking to see how ma y people voted that were below the age? Born after 2002? Might be a "glitch" in the system and easy to fake since normal people wouldnt search for birthdays in 2020 to find voters...
I think you're right. A date of 1/1/2020 makes sense for a manual override.
I think the 1/1/1900 dates are due to blank/default birth dates. In compsci, unless dates are specified as nullable, dates can't be null so the system probably defaults to a specific value, which probably is 1/1/1900 in this scenario.
This makes sense - in Windows and MSSQL DATETIME, a date value of 0 is 1 Jan 1900 at 00:00 GMT (shows up as 31 Dec 1899 at 7:00 PM if you're in eastern time)
Hey Fren,
I think she is right. Did anyone bother looking to see how ma y people voted that were below the age? Born after 2002? Might be a "glitch" in the system and easy to fake since normal people wouldnt search for birthdays in 2020 to find voters...
I think you're right. A date of 1/1/2020 makes sense for a manual override.
I think the 1/1/1900 dates are due to blank/default birth dates. In compsci, unless dates are specified as nullable, dates can't be null so the system probably defaults to a specific value, which probably is 1/1/1900 in this scenario.
This makes sense - in Windows and MSSQL DATETIME, a date value of 0 is 1 Jan 1900 at 00:00 GMT (shows up as 31 Dec 1899 at 7:00 PM if you're in eastern time)
Could this explain all the "dead people" who are still registered?