Let's be clear: We are going to follow each and every possible legal path to protect the Republic without bloodshed.
And if those paths are exhausted to no avail and we have to take up the most fundamental remedies laid down in our founding legal documents, yes we are going to shoot a loooooot of people.
Further super-extra-clarification, although it should be obvious: No Trump supporter wants armed conflict with other Americans and we will do every possible thing to avoid it without giving up Liberty. Wars are terrible and lots of innocent people get hurt. We have already shown every possible restraint, to that consideration. But if it comes down to giving up liberty of fighting a war, there will be a war - and we will win it.
You don't need to shoot people because well over half the people agree with you and the less than half that don't will not even be prepared to act if we all rose up at once.
Do a sit-in at one state capital and get enough cops to call in sick or refuse to clear you out. Do you think Trump will send people in to get you out? No way. Occupy and demand a full audit or re-vote.
A General Strike would be more effective. If Biden is inaugurated, strike until the election is audited in every state by federal marshals. If a state cant' come up with valid ballots & matching signature envelopes for EVERY gawdamn vote, then that state is in a state of fraud.
Wondering that too. It's good that people have protection, the more armed the populace the better, but at this point, it isn't like there are two opposing sides like North vs South or USA vs England.
I'd suggest you research civil wars to learn what they are like - none of this is new, it's all happened before many times in many places. First there are peaceful mass protests. If that doesn't work and/or there are state-sponsored attempts to break them, they turn into skirmishes. Under determined attempts to crush them with armed and forceful state response they can become military engagements, where the military gets partitioned up and/or disabled and irregular units eventually become formal units until there is partition or domination.
Yes we will shoot people. In a waR somebody has to shoot back at the enemy. BTW, there are very limited options and I'm not a doomer. I believe trump is going nowhere, he is staying at all cost and I aim to help anyway needed if I can. The legal battles expose how deep the deep is.
If we can't vote with ballots, we vote with bullets.
Wew.
We have way more votes than they do!
Billions and billions and billions more.
We need to get that number up to a gorillion ASAP.
Rookie numbers!!
The 305th Kraken crew!
Bill-yuns and bill-yuns
They just kept coming in! Truck loads of them at 4am!
More than 80 million of our "ballots"
I prefer 9mm ballots and 7.62 ballots. Widely avaible if I need more ballots to tabulate at 4 am.
From the rooftops
Let's be clear: We are going to follow each and every possible legal path to protect the Republic without bloodshed.
And if those paths are exhausted to no avail and we have to take up the most fundamental remedies laid down in our founding legal documents, yes we are going to shoot a loooooot of people.
Cut the heads off the snakes is all we have to do... there's a lot of snakes.
Came here to chew bubble gum and cut the heads of snakes....and Iām all out of gum
AND WHAT IF THEY SHOOT FIRST??
Anger mgt., rehab, community service?
9mm is 19c a round in normal times, and our stocks runneth deep.
Further super-extra-clarification, although it should be obvious: No Trump supporter wants armed conflict with other Americans and we will do every possible thing to avoid it without giving up Liberty. Wars are terrible and lots of innocent people get hurt. We have already shown every possible restraint, to that consideration. But if it comes down to giving up liberty of fighting a war, there will be a war - and we will win it.
You don't need to shoot people because well over half the people agree with you and the less than half that don't will not even be prepared to act if we all rose up at once.
Do a sit-in at one state capital and get enough cops to call in sick or refuse to clear you out. Do you think Trump will send people in to get you out? No way. Occupy and demand a full audit or re-vote.
they would achieve absolutely nothing. you are living in a dream world
Lol brilliant plan just suddenly become chief of police and tell the cops what to do, revolutionary
A General Strike would be more effective. If Biden is inaugurated, strike until the election is audited in every state by federal marshals. If a state cant' come up with valid ballots & matching signature envelopes for EVERY gawdamn vote, then that state is in a state of fraud.
Wondering that too. It's good that people have protection, the more armed the populace the better, but at this point, it isn't like there are two opposing sides like North vs South or USA vs England.
I'd suggest you research civil wars to learn what they are like - none of this is new, it's all happened before many times in many places. First there are peaceful mass protests. If that doesn't work and/or there are state-sponsored attempts to break them, they turn into skirmishes. Under determined attempts to crush them with armed and forceful state response they can become military engagements, where the military gets partitioned up and/or disabled and irregular units eventually become formal units until there is partition or domination.
Try to keep up, this is the end game.
It means that is what the commies both in and out side the USA want to happen in the USA.
Yes we will shoot people. In a waR somebody has to shoot back at the enemy. BTW, there are very limited options and I'm not a doomer. I believe trump is going nowhere, he is staying at all cost and I aim to help anyway needed if I can. The legal battles expose how deep the deep is.