because the left only gives a shit about winning and if they can convince enough of their fellow brainwashed faggot smoothbrain retard friends that "fraud is bad, but there wasnt enough to change the outcome, orange man still loses" then they couldnt give a rats ass about the actual fraud itself
Same as always. If their side does it (rape, sexually harass, murder, lie, cheat, steal) there is an excuse for it and it's no big deal. If they even suspect our side is doing it they want the whole constitution changed.
It shouldn't matter. 1 vote or 100 votes. If fraud or even irregularities are found, one side gets to contest and challenge those lots of votes with an audit. If they can't come to an agreement, through court arbitration if necessary, throw them out. Yeah it can be abused, which is why we have a process for vacating or filling offices regardless of the election results.
Of course that is a really extreme example so I don't know why it's even being brought up here. We have ample evidence of a loss of chain of custody over entire counties.
Fraud is fraud period. What is this "enough fraud to overturn the election?" The fraud in multiple states compromises this election PERIOD!
because the left only gives a shit about winning and if they can convince enough of their fellow brainwashed faggot smoothbrain retard friends that "fraud is bad, but there wasnt enough to change the outcome, orange man still loses" then they couldnt give a rats ass about the actual fraud itself
Same as always. If their side does it (rape, sexually harass, murder, lie, cheat, steal) there is an excuse for it and it's no big deal. If they even suspect our side is doing it they want the whole constitution changed.
exactly
It shouldn't matter. 1 vote or 100 votes. If fraud or even irregularities are found, one side gets to contest and challenge those lots of votes with an audit. If they can't come to an agreement, through court arbitration if necessary, throw them out. Yeah it can be abused, which is why we have a process for vacating or filling offices regardless of the election results.
Of course that is a really extreme example so I don't know why it's even being brought up here. We have ample evidence of a loss of chain of custody over entire counties.
Yes LET'S GOOO!!!