posted ago by UnusedPrinterInk ago by UnusedPrinterInk +6 / -0

If nationally renowned attorneys are publicly, loudly and repeatedly yelling to any one who will listen regarding evidence of voter and election fraud (they are different) and then presenting enough evidence to cause even judges to say "Whoa horsey, we gotta at least look at this...", how can state officials who are (supposed to be) on POTUS's side refuse to even acknowledge that fuckery may have been afoot and move forward with fraudulent result thus making themselves criminally liable if true?

The only two answers are;

  1. The POTUS team has nothing and are just flailing about with nothing or
  2. The officials themselves are compromised.

Are there additional options that I cannot reason to?

Each of the three hearings have been choked with what seems to me to be evidence. But I ain't a trial atty.

Comments (0)
sorted by: