607 Unconfirmed reports that AP has somewhat modified Barr's actual words. (twitter.com) posted 84 days ago by moraxal +607 / -0 31 comments share 31 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (31) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 34 ▼ – deleted 34 points 84 days ago +39 / -5 ▲ 16 ▼ – empiretc 16 points 84 days ago +16 / -0 yep. same happened with the Newsmax CEO statement the AP published. all bullshit. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 8 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz 8 points 84 days ago +8 / -0 Upon further inspection, I think that AP story was bullshit. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – DJ_NeckFace 7 points 83 days ago +7 / -0 AP Lost all credibility when they called a HIGHLY CONTESTED election for joe "you ain't black" biden. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – GCotN 5 points 83 days ago +5 / -0 AP lost all credibility when they agreed to publish Nazi propaganda to maintain access to Hitler. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz 2 points 83 days ago +2 / -0 To be fair, that was a part of their plan. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 83 days ago +4 / -2 ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 83 days ago +4 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 83 days ago +3 / -2 ▲ 12 ▼ – deleted 12 points 84 days ago +12 / -0 ▲ 5 ▼ – Tx50bmg 5 points 84 days ago +5 / -0 What? AP would "NEVER" do that.... 😒 permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – yanksali 4 points 84 days ago +4 / -0 Still a bs statement. Committing election fraud in a federal election is a federal and DOJ can prosecute, permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Constitution_jd 2 points 83 days ago +2 / -0 Not if it stretches into military tribunal territory. They may not have jurisdiction to investigate the higher fraud permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – raptoris 3 points 83 days ago +3 / -0 Another LARP I guess. If AP twisted his words, Trump campaign would have respond differently. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – AnIdahoan 3 points 84 days ago +3 / -0 Modified or no, how the hell would I take Barr at his word. Nothing in his acumen but Jack and shit, and Jack's just left town. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 84 days ago +2 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – rjdf 2 points 84 days ago +2 / -0 Upvote this. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – LibertarianWalkz 2 points 84 days ago +2 / -0 'Unconfirmed', motherfuckers? permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Redpill-notCommieRed 2 points 83 days ago +2 / -0 AP sometimes has trouble with reporting facts and quotes permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Notmypresidentelect 2 points 83 days ago +2 / -0 "Somewhat modified" won't change the overall outcome of his lack of findings. Will gladly eat my words if wrong. He is absolutely worthless. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Tweedlethree 1 point 83 days ago +1 / -0 Don't Care. Barr is no help at all. If he sues the AP I might take notice. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Itiswrittenkjv1611 1 point 83 days ago +1 / -0 AP needs to go on a helicopter ride permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – MinneMAGA 1 point 83 days ago +1 / -0 Does this make the AP's propaganda piece "doctored" or "deceptively edited" ...? permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – PatriotNebula 1 point 83 days ago +1 / -0 That was obvious. It needs to be confirmed if Barr knew that he was being interviewed for a statement. They are getting desperate. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point 84 days ago +1 / -0 modified "was widespread fraud" to "wasn't widespread fraud" probably. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Paul_Revere 1 point 83 days ago +1 / -0 I'll withold comment till I am able to read Barr's unedited words for myself. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 84 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – the_golden_path 1 point 83 days ago +1 / -0 AP needs to be investigated permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – geebeext 1 point 83 days ago +1 / -0 So what were his words permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – AtariArtist 1 point 83 days ago +1 / -0 I laughed it off too but when Barr went to the White House after the President issued an official response, it had a little more credibility - than 'disclose.tv'. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – iComputerFix 1 point 83 days ago +1 / -0 I'm Shocked!! Shocked!! That this may have been taken of context by the AP!! Umm...not really. permalink save report block reply
yep. same happened with the Newsmax CEO statement the AP published. all bullshit.
Upon further inspection, I think that AP story was bullshit.
AP Lost all credibility when they called a HIGHLY CONTESTED election for joe "you ain't black" biden.
AP lost all credibility when they agreed to publish Nazi propaganda to maintain access to Hitler.
To be fair, that was a part of their plan.
What? AP would "NEVER" do that.... 😒
Still a bs statement. Committing election fraud in a federal election is a federal and DOJ can prosecute,
Not if it stretches into military tribunal territory. They may not have jurisdiction to investigate the higher fraud
Another LARP I guess. If AP twisted his words, Trump campaign would have respond differently.
Modified or no, how the hell would I take Barr at his word. Nothing in his acumen but Jack and shit, and Jack's just left town.
Upvote this.
'Unconfirmed', motherfuckers?
AP sometimes has trouble with reporting facts and quotes
"Somewhat modified" won't change the overall outcome of his lack of findings. Will gladly eat my words if wrong. He is absolutely worthless.
Don't Care. Barr is no help at all. If he sues the AP I might take notice.
AP needs to go on a helicopter ride
Does this make the AP's propaganda piece "doctored" or "deceptively edited" ...?
That was obvious. It needs to be confirmed if Barr knew that he was being interviewed for a statement. They are getting desperate.
modified "was widespread fraud" to "wasn't widespread fraud"
probably.
I'll withold comment till I am able to read Barr's unedited words for myself.
AP needs to be investigated
So what were his words
I laughed it off too but when Barr went to the White House after the President issued an official response, it had a little more credibility - than 'disclose.tv'.
I'm Shocked!! Shocked!! That this may have been taken of context by the AP!!
Umm...not really.