8948
Comments (1882)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
78
FireannDireach 78 points ago +79 / -1

My rational side says that there is no procedural reason for DoJ to be involved

Has your rational side seen the comments in the hearings in PA, AZ, and MI where they're asking where the DOJ is, when outrageous criminal behavior is being described? Or the testimony by many of them that they contacted the FBI/DOJ, and were never contacted by them? Or Rudy mocking the FBI looking for them in a press conference? Or the weeks of people saying 'Where is the DOJ?"

1
1776Philly 1 point ago +11 / -10

So you think that FBI should come charging in the middle of all this? You think FBI can be trusted with that? Is that what you're suggesting?

Last week you all were saying that DOJ can't be trusted to clean a panfish. Now you're saying DOJ should put itself in the middle of this complex, crucial set of investigations...being carried out unimpeded by known patriots?

Just askin bro.

3
kaluahmon 3 points ago +4 / -1

"can't be trusted to clean a panfish". OMG how have I never heard this phrase before; it's brilliant!

5
Uridumas 5 points ago +5 / -0

What is a panfish... asking foe a fren