So Barr supposedly went out and made public statements to AP that would infuriate his boss (to say the least) just BEFORE he had a SCHEDULED meeting with his boss? Sounds logical (/s).
Now’s not the time for Barr to be spouting bullshit mind games or half-truths. Public opinion matters now more than ever. If there is evidence, or you aren’t sure if the evidence will turn out to be true, then don’t fucking say there’s no evidence.
So Barr supposedly went out and made public statements to AP that would infuriate his boss (to say the least) just BEFORE he had a SCHEDULED meeting with his boss? Sounds logical (/s).
my theory - IF Barr is on side (super IF), then his statement really means - there's no evidence to overturn the election, because:
But you know what they say about theories...
Now’s not the time for Barr to be spouting bullshit mind games or half-truths. Public opinion matters now more than ever. If there is evidence, or you aren’t sure if the evidence will turn out to be true, then don’t fucking say there’s no evidence.