1179
Comments (45)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
25
MagaGal 25 points ago +25 / -0

So Barr supposedly went out and made public statements to AP that would infuriate his boss (to say the least) just BEFORE he had a SCHEDULED meeting with his boss? Sounds logical (/s).

3
HatnNewLognReqs 3 points ago +3 / -0

my theory - IF Barr is on side (super IF), then his statement really means - there's no evidence to overturn the election, because:

  1. Trump won. Period.
  2. Electoral votes haven't been cast.
  3. Biden hasn't won shit.

But you know what they say about theories...

4
flabby-doo-dad 4 points ago +4 / -0

Now’s not the time for Barr to be spouting bullshit mind games or half-truths. Public opinion matters now more than ever. If there is evidence, or you aren’t sure if the evidence will turn out to be true, then don’t fucking say there’s no evidence.