I have a long and heavy IT background. I'm a systems engineer, architect, and a programmer. I've worked for ad agencies, extremely secure government facilities, lawyer firms, and have been sub-contracted by other companies. This woman sounded like an airhead.
I get that she was sub-contracted by another company to help out with Dominion, but what kind of infuriates me, is that the one person asking about re-running ballots had a very, very simple question: "Does re-running these ballots count toward the totals?"
If she had just fucking answered "yes" or "I believe so" or "according to Dominion's user manual, I have strong confidence that it does", then that would've shut him up right there. But she had to answer in such a snide way and even misinterpreted his question, thinking he meant one and only one ballot was being re-scanned.
Her testimony was good and damning to Dominion, but her answers were very bad - in a legal sense, anyway. Her answers needed to be more direct or precise.
My thoughts exactly and I’m neither IT nor lawyer.
I read the title thinking she would drop bombs left right center and instead all I see is half incoherent rambling and incapacity to get straight to the point.
That said one of the chicks in my IT department is impossible to understand either.
That incoherent babbling is exactly why she got hired by dominion. Its also why she's perfect for bringing down dominion.
This chick is clearly organized. She kept all documentarion from dominion and submitted it to the Trump campaign. She's probably decent with computers too. She's just bad at explaining technical things.
Dominion probably hired her because they needed some warm bodies to fulfill some legal requirement. So they hire a 90 year old man and some chick who doesn't sound like she knows what talking out. Turns out she's smarter than they think and has the spine to fuck them over.
I have a long and heavy IT background. I'm a systems engineer, architect, and a programmer. I've worked for ad agencies, extremely secure government facilities, lawyer firms, and have been sub-contracted by other companies. This woman sounded like an airhead.
I get that she was sub-contracted by another company to help out with Dominion, but what kind of infuriates me, is that the one person asking about re-running ballots had a very, very simple question: "Does re-running these ballots count toward the totals?"
If she had just fucking answered "yes" or "I believe so" or "according to Dominion's user manual, I have strong confidence that it does", then that would've shut him up right there. But she had to answer in such a snide way and even misinterpreted his question, thinking he meant one and only one ballot was being re-scanned.
Her testimony was good and damning to Dominion, but her answers were very bad - in a legal sense, anyway. Her answers needed to be more direct or precise.
My thoughts exactly and I’m neither IT nor lawyer.
I read the title thinking she would drop bombs left right center and instead all I see is half incoherent rambling and incapacity to get straight to the point.
That said one of the chicks in my IT department is impossible to understand either.
That incoherent babbling is exactly why she got hired by dominion. Its also why she's perfect for bringing down dominion.
This chick is clearly organized. She kept all documentarion from dominion and submitted it to the Trump campaign. She's probably decent with computers too. She's just bad at explaining technical things.
Dominion probably hired her because they needed some warm bodies to fulfill some legal requirement. So they hire a 90 year old man and some chick who doesn't sound like she knows what talking out. Turns out she's smarter than they think and has the spine to fuck them over.