She needs some coaching on how to answer, but I think she could be a star witness.
She kept saying "discard it," they didn't know that she meant to say discard the count on the tabulator and start the count again with the problem ballot on top of the batch.
And I think that the books being "less off" this time around is a clear indicator that someone fixed the log book and tried to hide something. Just my gut.
The rawness is what made it compelling. It was obvious she wasn't trying to lead anybody on a narrative. She was just giving her observations and gut reactions.
Well if they didn't bring any of the Trump votes and compensated with multiple countings of Biden votes, I could see that balancing out the total number of votes somewhat.
She needs some coaching on how to answer, but I think she could be a star witness.
She kept saying "discard it," they didn't know that she meant to say discard the count on the tabulator and start the count again with the problem ballot on top of the batch.
And I think that the books being "less off" this time around is a clear indicator that someone fixed the log book and tried to hide something. Just my gut.
You are correct. Her testimony was raw.
The rawness is what made it compelling. It was obvious she wasn't trying to lead anybody on a narrative. She was just giving her observations and gut reactions.
Well if they didn't bring any of the Trump votes and compensated with multiple countings of Biden votes, I could see that balancing out the total number of votes somewhat.
Not if they added biden votes for every trump vote that had an accident.