Comments (24)
sorted by:
8
RichardSaunders 8 points ago +8 / -0

suck a dick shill

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
7
handpeople 7 points ago +7 / -0

Fuck no. We know this shit was fraud all fucking over.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
4
3stepsahead 4 points ago +4 / -0

They're not going to SCOTUS over fraud. They're going to SCOTUS over constitutional issues.

3
hogimus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds good.

And if the court says there was fraud, will you apologize?

3
Jmk1970 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you going to apologize to us after they do find Fraud?

2
Trumpvtr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fucking NOOOOOOO WAY. Still Cleanin M1

2
MagaNV 2 points ago +2 / -0

for which state case?

2
james7370 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you don't see it then I imagine you wouldn't recognise your own mother.

There were 345,000 more ballots cast in my county in atlanta than registered voters.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
james7370 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mam it's on my counties website. Quit reading articles and look at the source

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
jornado87 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are you and all your faggot commie shill buddies going to apologize for the fake Russia hoax that was fully debunked by 2018 and calling us Nazi racists for 4 years? Didn't think so. Prepare to die.

1
GordonHeavyfoot 1 point ago +1 / -0

shills like ffakey fake fake here never apologize, they just disappear like the little disinformation cowards they are.

2
Topcold 2 points ago +2 / -0

for that particular law suit. Trump only need 1 to win

1
dannypipes75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Faggot

1
StolenErection 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am doubtful we will see a case like Bush v Gore where the court essentially decides a state's election for one candidate or the other.

This election will be decided by state legislators.

There may be some cases that get to the SC and favorable decisions may give more confidence to state lawmakers to award electors to Trump.

1
PilgrimFarAway 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, the first case before SCOTUS is likely to be the question of constitutionality of Act 77 in PA. PA's Chief Justice is a partisan hack, and he affirmed that the plaintiff will likely prevail. The District Court judge also ruled that the plaintiff is likely to prevail. Well, that is only one of three paths for PA. Note - this isn't based upon any overt fraud allegation, just unconstitutional adventurism.

Now, no sentient being is going to argue that there was no fraud in Georgia. That ship has sailed. Might they rule that it's not sufficient to throw out the election? Sure. Will they rule that there was no fraud - no, that's silly. Fake water main break with people jumping on the computers when they thought no one is looking. So, fraud is not deniable there.

Next, let's jump up to Wisconsin. The question isn't about fraud per-se. It's a question fo separation of powers. Did SoS overstep bounds when changing the means of the election due to the pandemic? Now, that's an excellent question for SCOTUS. Again, not a fraud question, but a good one.

Michigan, yes - we are getting into some really nice and meaty fraud stuff here. It is not possible to read the analysis of the vote anomalies and objectively believe the results. Only 25% of Wayne County precincts were even in balance. Truck drivers line up to tell of massive quantities of fake ballots.

Look - believe what you will, but this isn't going to end up how you think. Your days of prancing about gloating are numbered.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Vazte 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apologize for what ? Have Dems apologized for 2016 russian hoax, the illegal wiretapping among many others ?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1