Well, the first case before SCOTUS is likely to be the question of constitutionality of Act 77 in PA. PA's Chief Justice is a partisan hack, and he affirmed that the plaintiff will likely prevail. The District Court judge also ruled that the plaintiff is likely to prevail. Well, that is only one of three paths for PA. Note - this isn't based upon any overt fraud allegation, just unconstitutional adventurism.
Now, no sentient being is going to argue that there was no fraud in Georgia. That ship has sailed. Might they rule that it's not sufficient to throw out the election? Sure. Will they rule that there was no fraud - no, that's silly. Fake water main break with people jumping on the computers when they thought no one is looking. So, fraud is not deniable there.
Next, let's jump up to Wisconsin. The question isn't about fraud per-se. It's a question fo separation of powers. Did SoS overstep bounds when changing the means of the election due to the pandemic? Now, that's an excellent question for SCOTUS. Again, not a fraud question, but a good one.
Michigan, yes - we are getting into some really nice and meaty fraud stuff here. It is not possible to read the analysis of the vote anomalies and objectively believe the results. Only 25% of Wayne County precincts were even in balance. Truck drivers line up to tell of massive quantities of fake ballots.
Look - believe what you will, but this isn't going to end up how you think. Your days of prancing about gloating are numbered.
Well, the first case before SCOTUS is likely to be the question of constitutionality of Act 77 in PA. PA's Chief Justice is a partisan hack, and he affirmed that the plaintiff will likely prevail. The District Court judge also ruled that the plaintiff is likely to prevail. Well, that is only one of three paths for PA. Note - this isn't based upon any overt fraud allegation, just unconstitutional adventurism.
Now, no sentient being is going to argue that there was no fraud in Georgia. That ship has sailed. Might they rule that it's not sufficient to throw out the election? Sure. Will they rule that there was no fraud - no, that's silly. Fake water main break with people jumping on the computers when they thought no one is looking. So, fraud is not deniable there.
Next, let's jump up to Wisconsin. The question isn't about fraud per-se. It's a question fo separation of powers. Did SoS overstep bounds when changing the means of the election due to the pandemic? Now, that's an excellent question for SCOTUS. Again, not a fraud question, but a good one.
Michigan, yes - we are getting into some really nice and meaty fraud stuff here. It is not possible to read the analysis of the vote anomalies and objectively believe the results. Only 25% of Wayne County precincts were even in balance. Truck drivers line up to tell of massive quantities of fake ballots.
Look - believe what you will, but this isn't going to end up how you think. Your days of prancing about gloating are numbered.