"Disputing", "Widespread", "No evidence", "Baseless", "Change Outcome", This article is full of bullshit "buzzwords" that commie propagandist scum love.

Remember that AP and many outlets can and should be in a lot of trouble for what they are deliberately doing. AP DOES NOT HAVE ANY AUTHORITY TO CALL ELECTIONS!

The election has not been "called." It is not over. And POTUS absolutely will NOT concede!

MSM PRESSURE MEANS LESS THAN NOTHING! IT ACTUALLY MEANS WE ARE WINNING!

"No widespread election fraud"

Notice this does not deny fraud? It simply says it's not "widespread." How do you define "widespread?" It's a vague semantics game that they always play. They are moving goalposts.

They are not covering the real stories we are seeing here everyday. They are propaganda TRASH!

"Trump’s effort to subvert the results of the 2020 presidential election and his refusal to concede his loss to President-Elect Joe Biden."

SUBVERT! This is pure commie projection!

Subvert definition is literally to undermine the power/authority of an established system or institution... Hmmm

Joe Biden is not President-Elect! And WAY, WAY too much of the country will never accept that he legitimately won. Joe Biden and the democrats would be LOUD and CRAZY to clear this up if they were confident he won.

"Barr said U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received..."

Remember there is a civil war within these agencies themselves and the FBI.

"That memorandum gave prosecutors the ability to go around longstanding Justice Department policy that normally would prohibit such overt actions before the election was certified. Soon after it was issued, the department’s top elections crime official announced he would step aside from that position because of the memo."

Swamp is deeply entrenched.

"...the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election."

THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT (others have, get it?) has not uncovered evidence... Article later states:

"He said people were confusing the use of the federal criminal justice system with allegations that should be made in civil lawsuits. He said such a remedy for those complaints would be a top-down audit conducted by state or local officials, not the U.S. Justice Department.

“There’s a growing tendency to use the criminal justice system as sort of a default fix-all, and people don’t like something they want the Department of Justice to come in and ‘investigate,’” Barr said.""

THIS IS CLEARCUT PROOF THAT THE ARTICLE HEADLINE AND AUTHOR IS DELIBERATELY OBFUSCATING EXACTLY WHAT AG BARR HAS COMMUNICATED!

We still may not like what AG Barr is saying... But the FACT of the matter is that THERE IS PLENTY OF EVIDENCE and it grows by the day.

Beyond the voting fraud evidence, there are CONSTITUTIONAL matters that have been violated!

EQUAL PROTECTION!

Just look at these 2 sentences:

"They have filed multiple lawsuits in battleground states alleging that partisan poll watchers didn’t have a clear enough view at polling sites in some locations and therefore something illegal must have happened. The claims have been repeatedly dismissed including by Republican judges who have ruled the suits lacked evidence."

REALLY? This is all the lawsuits concern? This is insanely dishonest and just plain wrong! And just look how this author dismisses this one point as if it is not a serious issue.

And no judges have ruled against us. They have not looked at the evidence because they have made frivolous technicality excuses... And, in addition, several judges are giving credence to our pleas.

So please calm down!