The affidavit seems to be a pen test against all servers under their domain? One of the connections listed was from scorecard.indivisible.org. If scorecard is supposed to be secret, making that your subdomain is pretty dumb.
Is this about a web server? Are the connections from voting machines? The machines could be offline, and this stuff still be processed on the internet because batches of votes are sent to a central networked computer for upload. We know this because one of the other threads a few days ago was about some voting place asking for gigabit network to handle the traffic.
If they're talking about traffic to a webserver for a product sold globally, then I can easily see why you'd have connections from IP addresses across the globe. Heck, my desktop computer will have connections all over the globe too right now.
Need to know what kind of server we're talking about... and even if its not a web server, and its a server to total votes, that could still be normal for a global product.
It just seems REALLY dumb to configure your countries votes to be totaled by a 3rd party across the internet.
If 2000 is any indication, we have seven days to get to SCOTUS. This might be a "no more, no less" situation. Trump needs to use every day before the 8th to the best of his advantage to make it clear what happened. We will know if Trump will stay in office in January by Friday evening.
He's letting the rats squirm, and getting ready to pick them off as they run.
The cover-up (like shredding ballots and hard-disks) tends to be easier to catch them for, so you can later do the full investigation (or squeeze them to flip on the next guy above them).
Which is probably the main point of these hearings... Can't deny with all this evidence being talked about... like Powell said they'll be certifying their own fraud!
You telling me that not only are we sending traffic to foreign countries but that it's also unencrypted traffic? That seems unlikely. Then again people in IT do seem borderline retarded most of the time.
Software guy here, and I work in a massive company everyone here has heard of.
In 2020, we're finally doing a push to require internal applications have encryption on all endpoints.
A few years ago we had our internal networks hacked and data dumped to the internet. Know how we found out? Someone uploaded proprietary source code to github and one of our developers spotted it. Yeah, we also had code with hard coded passwords in it.
The hack never made the news but I was on multiple calls because they were questioning everyone about it to try to find the source.
My latest theory is all this evidence is not for us, it's for the normies plus to make the evidence public so when states certify, they'll be certifying their own fraud like Powell said
These hearings are just testing grounds as well as diversions for the supreme court.
Its going to be fucking epic.
The evidemce will be so polished amd obvious
I can repeat again because I am nice. With the packets they have solid proof of server signatures due to TLS encryption. This way the malice can be traced on a very detailed scale. TLS is a signature and encryption data delivery protocol.
More grandstanding. He doesn't have the data he couldn't possibly know he has the data. And even if he did manage to isolate the data coming from their network and capture it, it could be someone watching cat videos for all they know. This shit keeps popping up, this Col is spouting off his mouth worse than Lin Wood. Everyone is going to downvote me, but just like Q this will turn out to be a fucking LARP. And I'll be right again.
You're probably right as much as a broken clock is. You don't know which items of the myriad of examples will ultimately save the day.
The data glitches against one candidate was real, also done in the 2016 Den primaries against Sanders, but it's a matter of figuring out how to gather the evidence in a very short amount of time.
Remember when everyone thought RSA was perfect? Look up the "low-order key vulnerability". Just took common hardware to evolve to be fast enough were a personal computer could try enough of the right prime factors (works even better/faster with enough key samples). Granted, I know it doesn't work for high-order, but that's not the point. If they are teaching the average grad student that, imagine what the cream-of-the-crop know.
It's always an arms-race, and we have no idea what the NSA has up their sleeve.
On the flip-side, these are sloppy election workers using a system designed to be hacked. Do you really think Domini9n will be that secure? Sure, TLS is great. But what if they forgot to patch the server and it has a heartbleed vulnerability (or something like that)? Or hell, the passwords may have been written on the console on a stickie note (and they get the precious encryption cert that way, bypassing the need to attack TLS).
More importantly, go watch the videos where the voting console can be compromised in 2 min flat. Security was obviously not a major concern in this system design.
I wouldn't look at Dominion assuming it's your average Corporate level system. It's probably bizarrely different that anything we've every seen, and built to be broken into easily. The Kraken probably tore through it like wet paper.
If China / NKorea / Russia were involved, hell, they may have gotten so cocky that they didnt bother with serious hardening, since they figured they'd just tell their black-hats to stay away from it, and shoot those that didn't listen...
This is fucking huge.
HUGE.
Fuck Barr, it doesn't matter if he's along for the ride or not, the Foreign Interference EO practically assumes this anyway.
I'm trying to make sense of what is being said.
The affidavit seems to be a pen test against all servers under their domain? One of the connections listed was from scorecard.indivisible.org. If scorecard is supposed to be secret, making that your subdomain is pretty dumb.
Is this about a web server? Are the connections from voting machines? The machines could be offline, and this stuff still be processed on the internet because batches of votes are sent to a central networked computer for upload. We know this because one of the other threads a few days ago was about some voting place asking for gigabit network to handle the traffic.
If they're talking about traffic to a webserver for a product sold globally, then I can easily see why you'd have connections from IP addresses across the globe. Heck, my desktop computer will have connections all over the globe too right now.
Need to know what kind of server we're talking about... and even if its not a web server, and its a server to total votes, that could still be normal for a global product.
It just seems REALLY dumb to configure your countries votes to be totaled by a 3rd party across the internet.
And Hillary had a server in her closet that she had her maid print stuff out from
Can Trump just hold another press briefing like on Thanksgiving and roll out all the data? It’s time to wrap this nonsense up once and for all.
They are waiting till the States certify and there's no turning back. Now they can identify all the swamp creatures.
If 2000 is any indication, we have seven days to get to SCOTUS. This might be a "no more, no less" situation. Trump needs to use every day before the 8th to the best of his advantage to make it clear what happened. We will know if Trump will stay in office in January by Friday evening.
Untrue arbitrary timeline.
We already know, no way President Trump allows Biden's punk ass in the white house
He's letting the rats squirm, and getting ready to pick them off as they run.
The cover-up (like shredding ballots and hard-disks) tends to be easier to catch them for, so you can later do the full investigation (or squeeze them to flip on the next guy above them).
this was from yesterday, how did we all miss this part?
We all caught it. They certified anyway.
Certified means an election took place. They don't weigh evidence and they have no legal background.
They certify they have confidence in the election. If they were aware there was potential fraud and certified there's some state and federal laws.
Which is probably the main point of these hearings... Can't deny with all this evidence being talked about... like Powell said they'll be certifying their own fraud!
Everyone who fraudulently certified just torpedoed their civil career, right?
If so, seems like a really easy way to "clean house" from all the corruption ... guess they can all be trash collectors now :)
We caught it. There were posts. Didnt change a thing.
You telling me that not only are we sending traffic to foreign countries but that it's also unencrypted traffic? That seems unlikely. Then again people in IT do seem borderline retarded most of the time.
You're not wrong -- and I'm a director of IT.
Laziness leads to shortcuts and shortcuts mean vulnerabilities in this industry. It happens A LOT more often than we'd care to admit.
Software architect here. I only say these things from the heart.
Systems engineer here, but was it a requirement !
Ahh yes, the "just following orders" of the IT world.
Feature, not a bug: this way, China and Iran can watch the raw results stream by also in real-time without trying very hard!
Software guy here, and I work in a massive company everyone here has heard of.
In 2020, we're finally doing a push to require internal applications have encryption on all endpoints.
A few years ago we had our internal networks hacked and data dumped to the internet. Know how we found out? Someone uploaded proprietary source code to github and one of our developers spotted it. Yeah, we also had code with hard coded passwords in it.
The hack never made the news but I was on multiple calls because they were questioning everyone about it to try to find the source.
But are you too big to fail™¿¿
Commies are lazy.
Is this a currently serving colonel?
My latest theory is all this evidence is not for us, it's for the normies plus to make the evidence public so when states certify, they'll be certifying their own fraud like Powell said
These hearings are just testing grounds as well as diversions for the supreme court. Its going to be fucking epic. The evidemce will be so polished amd obvious
The server was likely gotten to further verify the data packets being captured.
Please lord 🙏
I can repeat again because I am nice. With the packets they have solid proof of server signatures due to TLS encryption. This way the malice can be traced on a very detailed scale. TLS is a signature and encryption data delivery protocol.
Not news.
More grandstanding. He doesn't have the data he couldn't possibly know he has the data. And even if he did manage to isolate the data coming from their network and capture it, it could be someone watching cat videos for all they know. This shit keeps popping up, this Col is spouting off his mouth worse than Lin Wood. Everyone is going to downvote me, but just like Q this will turn out to be a fucking LARP. And I'll be right again.
You're probably right as much as a broken clock is. You don't know which items of the myriad of examples will ultimately save the day.
The data glitches against one candidate was real, also done in the 2016 Den primaries against Sanders, but it's a matter of figuring out how to gather the evidence in a very short amount of time.
kek
1) LARP - Live Action Roll Play. Are you saying we put an actor out there to PLAY a colonel?!
2) Saying he "couldn't possibly know he has the data" is like a desperate LARP by you as if you could even know that.
3) Sack up or ship out. We don't need doomers nor shills.
don't mistake pointing out fake shit as dooming.,
I don't. You calling Rudy fake? This is his witness.
TLS isn't perfect.
Remember when everyone thought RSA was perfect? Look up the "low-order key vulnerability". Just took common hardware to evolve to be fast enough were a personal computer could try enough of the right prime factors (works even better/faster with enough key samples). Granted, I know it doesn't work for high-order, but that's not the point. If they are teaching the average grad student that, imagine what the cream-of-the-crop know.
It's always an arms-race, and we have no idea what the NSA has up their sleeve.
On the flip-side, these are sloppy election workers using a system designed to be hacked. Do you really think Domini9n will be that secure? Sure, TLS is great. But what if they forgot to patch the server and it has a heartbleed vulnerability (or something like that)? Or hell, the passwords may have been written on the console on a stickie note (and they get the precious encryption cert that way, bypassing the need to attack TLS).
More importantly, go watch the videos where the voting console can be compromised in 2 min flat. Security was obviously not a major concern in this system design.
I wouldn't look at Dominion assuming it's your average Corporate level system. It's probably bizarrely different that anything we've every seen, and built to be broken into easily. The Kraken probably tore through it like wet paper.
If China / NKorea / Russia were involved, hell, they may have gotten so cocky that they didnt bother with serious hardening, since they figured they'd just tell their black-hats to stay away from it, and shoot those that didn't listen...