Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
Only the "media" can do that. CNN has special rights, like the right to posses hillarys emails and let you know there's nothing to see there. It's illegal for you to look at them so take their word for it
I haven't checked but I'm sure he'll be accused of "hacking" their meetings by calling in with a phone number and an access code.
Which makes me wonder, why, for two months, none of these CNN morons questioned that there was a silent, unknown caller participating in all of their executive meetings?
What I love is that the person who gave access is obviously high level to be invited to meetings where he not only hears the CNN president speak daily, but such a meeting where one can buzz in and the president will talk directly to them.
This probably bothers Jeff Zucker so much lol. He now knows he has a “traitor” in his midst.
Why would they go to law enforcement and not to there legal department? Oh because its bullshit and CNN knows it and its a weak attempt to save face. Cheers to PV for doing real work out there.
Theoretically, if they were in a 2 party consent State it would be illegal to secretly record. However, since they discussed it in a zoom meeting I'd argue that they don't have an expectation of privacy being on an online format.
My girlfriends dad showed me the audio tape of melania bashing Christmas, but I had to ask - what conversation did she have that she was so frustrated with Christmas decorations that made her so upset? I’d like to hear the audio that preempted that conversation that was broadcast all over the MSM
Oh...so freedom of the press only refers to liberals and not conservatives. Thanks for clearing that up CNN. Here I was thinking it was for all media outlets.
The law we just made up here at CNN by the power vested in us by our imagination says, " If and only if CNN does secretly record a conversation of the FLOTUS that it is completely legal but if anyone not previously authorized by CNN secretly records anyone that is illegal and racist" ( CNN Law No.18) and that this is legitimate because we say so. -Jeffrey "Loobin" Toobin
It’s like Huffpost and the Fappening where they told readers to not look at the leaked nude photos of female celebrities, despite a year earlier they published the leaked Hulk Hogan sex tape and even when ordered by a judge to remove it they defiantly said they wouldn’t.
They'll probably try to get him on recording laws that require two party consent. But the real reason for it will be to try to get him to out whoever let him in on the calls. So they'll cry 'He hacked us!", and he'll say "Nope", and they'll say "Prove it", and they'll use that to try to legally force him to reveal how he got access.
Unless one part of the phone call occurred in CT, PA, MD, FL, NH, MT, WA, CA, then CNN "Legal Experts" are dumber than fucking rocks and there isn't a chance in hell of any crime.
Even if they did, people from those states can't reasonably claim expectation of privacy in an online conference call involving people from states without those laws.
Well it depends, because Zucker lives in Florida, which is a two party consent state, and he could have been doing calls from there. But I doubt there are any legal issues, because O'Keefe knows better and he would run everything by a lawyer. Let's keep in mind that when he got charged before when he was younger, he was charged wrongfully. He's always done his due diligence to know what he can and can't do.
It's different for the media
Good thing O'Keefe is media.
That's not what we meant.
-CNN media
Masturbate on work zoom calls with the camera exposing your donger. Not worthy of suspension and definately not a crime.
-CNN cheif legal analyst
Hey but I like my job and my wily.
(In honor of my namesake whom I loathe so very much)
I was told by my employers that it's normal and completely acceptable to multi task on zoom calls
'He was just explaining to his donger what pedohentai is.'
Some medias are more equal than others
Just call yourself and independent journalist and you can say any lie you like about CNN.
Their window for backpedaling is narrowing by the day. It's sad people can be so stupid to believe they are not literal scum
and Here's Why.
And here’s how you should feel about that
What James O'Keefe did has a long history steeped in racism -- that's no OK
Rules don’t apply to multibillion dollar corporations
Only the "media" can do that. CNN has special rights, like the right to posses hillarys emails and let you know there's nothing to see there. It's illegal for you to look at them so take their word for it
Just a small correction, but I believe it was DNC/Podesta emails, not Hillary's.
Hahaha. No it’s not if a cnn employee gave him access. LMAO
say it with me: CNN SUCKS! CNN SUCKS!
CNN CUCKS! CNN CUCKS!
CNN SUCKS! CNN SUCKS!
Didn't know HanAssholeSolo works at CNN now
what a wild ride
I haven't checked but I'm sure he'll be accused of "hacking" their meetings by calling in with a phone number and an access code.
Which makes me wonder, why, for two months, none of these CNN morons questioned that there was a silent, unknown caller participating in all of their executive meetings?
They assumed it was their silent unknown caller. Probably have a line dedicated specifically for China.
lmao. We can't even have an online meeting if everyone isn't identified. We just cancel it and change it up.
Yeah, if we have a caller who doesn't identify themselves they get booted. Pretty simple security measure.
What I love is that the person who gave access is obviously high level to be invited to meetings where he not only hears the CNN president speak daily, but such a meeting where one can buzz in and the president will talk directly to them.
This probably bothers Jeff Zucker so much lol. He now knows he has a “traitor” in his midst.
Wouldn't he have to give up his source as the party to the conversation who consented to the wiretap to make that argument?
Just say, "An undisclosed source" or "A high level source" and you're covered.
No, the person who gave him access obviously had privileges to invite others to the meeting.
LMAO. I wonder if CNN is tired of getting BTFO by O'Keefe
Weds morning 8 am
Secretary: Good morning Mr Zucker.
Zucker: GOD FUCKING DAMMMT O KEEFE
We got O'Keefed!
I'm picturing this happening and I'm smiling ear to ear.
Sandman 2.0
Cheeks Never Near
CHARLIE'S IN THE TREES
You can't secretly record the secret recorders you bigot!
I heard officer Dewey from Scream when I read this.
Or the time they brought the resources of a multi national corporation to bear to doxx some shitposter.
RIP u/hanassholesolo
You're spicy memes will be missed.
That is a name I have not heard in long long time.
LOL, hope you enjoy eating a bag of dicks, CNN!
Whom ever is the whistle-blower inside CNN god bless you.
Deep undercover in enemy territory! You know they are going through Dem donation logs trying to determine who it is!
Hero!
-Master Wuhan
ᵏᵉᵏ
Is it legal for me to listen to the CNN tapes?
"No, we must listen to it to find out what's in it"
you have to pass the bill before you know what's in it, it's the Pelosi way
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, GET FUCKED COMMIE NEWS NETWORK
Why would they go to law enforcement and not to there legal department? Oh because its bullshit and CNN knows it and its a weak attempt to save face. Cheers to PV for doing real work out there.
Theoretically, if they were in a 2 party consent State it would be illegal to secretly record. However, since they discussed it in a zoom meeting I'd argue that they don't have an expectation of privacy being on an online format.
Legal experts also say its not a felony. Interesting to say the least.
*social workers
Socialist workers
Hahahahaha
What law enforcement? Antifa?
This is so golden..🌟 thank you James O’keefe. CNN SUCKS. BYE BYE CUCKS.
My girlfriends dad showed me the audio tape of melania bashing Christmas, but I had to ask - what conversation did she have that she was so frustrated with Christmas decorations that made her so upset? I’d like to hear the audio that preempted that conversation that was broadcast all over the MSM
lolololol
Oh...so freedom of the press only refers to liberals and not conservatives. Thanks for clearing that up CNN. Here I was thinking it was for all media outlets.
https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql1lQTb8/first-cnn-tapes-drop-download--s/c/
The law we just made up here at CNN by the power vested in us by our imagination says, " If and only if CNN does secretly record a conversation of the FLOTUS that it is completely legal but if anyone not previously authorized by CNN secretly records anyone that is illegal and racist" ( CNN Law No.18) and that this is legitimate because we say so. -Jeffrey "Loobin" Toobin
nice
Anyone who gives any form of credibility to CNN these days, to me are literal retards. Change my mind.
It’s like Huffpost and the Fappening where they told readers to not look at the leaked nude photos of female celebrities, despite a year earlier they published the leaked Hulk Hogan sex tape and even when ordered by a judge to remove it they defiantly said they wouldn’t.
Pure hypocrisy.
Oh no.
That sucks.
Would that be the legal expert who was jerking off on camera?
Serious: Anyone know what statute they're thinking PV criminally violated?
O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62, § 16-11-64, and § 16-11-66.
Thank you
They'll probably try to get him on recording laws that require two party consent. But the real reason for it will be to try to get him to out whoever let him in on the calls. So they'll cry 'He hacked us!", and he'll say "Nope", and they'll say "Prove it", and they'll use that to try to legally force him to reveal how he got access.
CNN, O'Keefe is a lawyer you dumb shits. He knows whether or not he is within his rights.
Looooool
Get fucked commies
Notice how there post was fact checked.
Unless one part of the phone call occurred in CT, PA, MD, FL, NH, MT, WA, CA, then CNN "Legal Experts" are dumber than fucking rocks and there isn't a chance in hell of any crime.
Even if they did, people from those states can't reasonably claim expectation of privacy in an online conference call involving people from states without those laws.
what are the two party consent laws where it was recorded, bet its not a felony since it probably happened in a liberal shithole lol
CNN is headquartered in Georgia; one-party consent state.
Well it depends, because Zucker lives in Florida, which is a two party consent state, and he could have been doing calls from there. But I doubt there are any legal issues, because O'Keefe knows better and he would run everything by a lawyer. Let's keep in mind that when he got charged before when he was younger, he was charged wrongfully. He's always done his due diligence to know what he can and can't do.
CNN the most BUSTED name in news.
they cry out in pain as they strike you
it is also illegal to look at the contents of Weiners laptop
FBI I 100% know it
Talk about grasping for straws lol
Cunty Nemesis Network
Loser comment
https://wfpl.org/mitch-mcconnell-tape-fallout-fbi-digs-how-progress-kentucky-helps-gop-was-it-illegal-0/
This is not a meme. It is real. kek
An online conference call involving a bunch of "journalists" can hardly be considered private.
"...you can't record conversations... Thats our job !! Fredo C.