Military law isn't the same as civil law, while in, you are subject to ucmj and all local laws. I'm positive there's just extra testing before you can be "registered military lawyer".
But obviously why it's relevant is because we're all hoping this ends up in military courts. This is treason.
Look, if treason is punishable by execution, I want to see some good old-fashioned Constitutional, daddy-dick military justice. That's only if people are found guilty of high crimes. We're long overdue for someone's life being made an example of for crimes against our Republic.
President & Commander in Chief Trump snaps his fingers, we're in for a week-long marathon of military justice with a prejudice.
Duck duck Go , a better choice to thwart the evil of Sundar Pichai .Google used to have : Do no evil " as its corporate motto . That was quietly dropped and now...... here we are .
I went to the site and in one of the comment the Military Code was cited:
"Rule 502. Qualifications and duties of personnel of courts-martial
(a) Members.
(1) Qualifications. The members detailed to a court-martial shall be those persons who in the opinion of the convening authority are best qualified for the duty by reason of their age, education, training, experience, length of service, and judicial temperament. Each member shall be on active duty with the armed forces and shall be:
(A) A commissioned officer;
(B) A warrant officer, except when the accused is a commissioned officer; or
(C) An enlisted person, except when the accused is either a commissioned or warrant officer.
Again Sidney CANNOT PROSECUTE in a Military Tribunal setting, period."
Could someone with the appropriate expertise say whether and if so how this is incorrect? (I hope it is, but I also believe in research and sauce.)
EDIT: Even if she's not qualified to prosecute before a military tribunal, it may be moot provided she has top-flight military lawyers on her team.
Important part: Trump is gonna let it play out before he pulls the trigger, gotta let each state prove it isn't going to protect the rights of its constituents
Yep, these hearing and rallies need to happen to sway public opinion so that when Trump pulls the trigger people are ready. We already have some Biden voters being vocal with their regret learning that he supports lockdowns. We just to need to keep building our momentum by individually chipping in where we can.
Give em all the 'rope', false sense of security, and media cover to willingly and intentionally walk into his trap before going scorched earth. This isn't Minority Report and timing is everything.
Timing is everything, undoubtedly. They must first commit their crimes, felonies, sedition and/or treason before the trap door is sealed shut. I continue to have faith and trust in GEOTUS.
The one benefit I’ve gotten from my leftist university masters program is reading from our founding fathers in the federalist papers, their biographies, and other historical texts. I got a new found appreciation for how genius those patriot mother fuckers are. God bless them.
With that being said, they knew damn well the potential of corruption that could face the nation in hundreds of years after they were gone. They knew the history that played out before them. They wanted our country to last through trials and tribulations.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: my dream is for Trump to initiate a second Reconstruction period that targets our major cities. Our cities have so much potential that is fizzled out by corrupt Democrat patronage machines and their unions and pensions. I don't expect it to happen, but my Lord would it be a spectacle.
Cool! It'd be a crazy undertaking. There are some commonalities but also some uniqueness to each city. But the pensions and unions are a solid place to start.
Notice what the Trump legal team's suits talk about. Certain voters (any part or class of people) not being treated fairly (deprived of a privilege). Ie: certain precincts were allowed to cure ballots while others were not, therefore the voters were not being treated equally.
If Trump is to use the Insurrection Act, I think it will only happen after a major ruling goes in his favor. He could then use that to back him up.
As opposed to, say, 9 unelected people who wear funny black robes? Or hundreds of legislators, half of whom are disloyal to our country?
The only SAFE repository of power is the People themselves. But we have learned through history (there's that word again!) that people will naturally invest their power in a single individual, then in a council, then in a parliament, and finally go back to either anarchy for a time or a dictator.
We are naturally prone to give away our most precious birthright for a bowl of pottage. (See: Isaac vs. Esau.)
Our Founding Fathers knew full well how stupid people are, and in order to protect us from ourselves, designed a system whereby, when rights are threatened one way or the other, there is a solution.
And the solution today is investing a whole lot of power in one man who has proven himself worthy to wield such a power.
Julius Caesar is one of the most misunderstood people from history. His error was getting killed. Had he lived, we would celebrate him the same way we celebrate Oliver Cromwell and George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. These men all did similar things. Only AFTER they did what they did, did we try to invent fictions about why what they did was right and lawful and just. These men, however, had only the passion in their heart that even though they knew they were breaking laws and traditions, they were doing it for the right reasons and there truly was no other way.
There is a time for dictatorship, just like there is a time for deliberation and democracy. Anarchy has its place as well. All must be balanced and set at odds with each other, only able to overpower the others when they fight for individual rights. Had CONGRESS been leading the charge in taking on voter fraud, we would be with them. Had the COURTS done it, we would have been for them. As it is, Trump is in position to gain supreme leadership of the American people, at least for a time, for the simple fact that he and he alone stands to protect our rights.
The Founding Fathers were expecting us to get in the exact sort of problem we are in, and are expecting Trump to declare martial law, even summoning up the militia, and putting down the rebellion of those who are threatening and violating our most basic rights. AS HE SHOULD.
If the courts fail, if President Trump fails to do so, we are left with anarchy as the people will do it themselves. No one wants that. But we will gladly choose it over the alternative: SLAVERY.
The constitutional powers given to the president are nowhere near the 2020 president's powers. By now, the president has far too much power (along with the whole government). However I agree with many of your points. There are times in history that call for different kinds of government, different kinds of solutions. I'm glad right now that it's Trump in there because I do trust him. But we are playing with fire if the government isn't majorly stripped down, very soon.
She was already in the Whitehouse and was responsible for selling us out to China. We've been in a constant state of emergency since the 70's. The Bush's were even worse with the wars they waged to line the pockets if the military industrial complex. And Obama was worse than any of them with his drones and turning the Federal government into tyrants so ruthless it would make the gestapo blush.
Yeah I agree, before Trump we had at least 3 AWFUL presidents in a row who completely abused their power. That is exactly my argument, the executive is too strong. If you go back to a strict constitutional interpretation, the executive can't do 90% of what they're doing today. There wouldn't be an Obama level of power back in 1800.
It's a legislative issue. Congress passed too many terrible laws. Point is, you're not going to solve anything by tying your hands behind your back while your subordinates steal the country for China.
It's just a big government issue, but to the core it's a fiat money issue. If we were still on the gold standard it would be impossible for the government to fund itself through taxation. They'd have to actually tax the citizens, and there's no way citizens would be able to fund this large of a government. Return to gold standard ='s the government automatically shrinks and loses power.
I hate to be that guy, but that is the exact example that Q used 3 years ago when talking about Trump invoking the Insurrection Act and using the military to drain the swamp.
Hasn't one of Rudy's main arguments been that peoples' right to vote has been deprived by the fraud? Seems to me he's been repeating that point pretty regularly.
Got my interest but seems more like a Tom Clancy novel type plot than reality. Of course not sure Tom Clancy ever wrote about Commies attempting to cheat their way into the White House. Reality stranger than fiction.
Interesting. I’ll have to check it out. Cite some examples if you can. Just seems like a heavy hammer to use that low information citizens wil not understand
I sure would like the 14th A to be used here in CA and all the mainly Demtard controlled states which are purposely crashing their economies using the PLANdemic as a reason. Would love to see Newscum, Piglousy, and Garshitty marched off in handcuffs .
What and or why was the amendment amended? Was the intent to insure slavery wasnt practiced again and if it was the amendment allows the government to use the military to enforce the constitution and amendments?
Yes, it is.
And what do you know, coincidentally, Sidney Powell is a registered military lawyer.
Just all a big coincidence.
https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2020/11/23/sidney-powell-is-registered-as-a-military-lawyer-and-is-the-only-one-who-can-prosecute-treason-at-a-tribunal/
You can just search for "Sidney Powell Military Lawyer" .........
Military law isn't the same as civil law, while in, you are subject to ucmj and all local laws. I'm positive there's just extra testing before you can be "registered military lawyer".
But obviously why it's relevant is because we're all hoping this ends up in military courts. This is treason.
Look, if treason is punishable by execution, I want to see some good old-fashioned Constitutional, daddy-dick military justice. That's only if people are found guilty of high crimes. We're long overdue for someone's life being made an example of for crimes against our Republic.
President & Commander in Chief Trump snaps his fingers, we're in for a week-long marathon of military justice with a prejudice.
Fire up the Commander in Chief memes, Pedes.
Way overdue
Can’t we just do the traitors like the Italians did to Mussolini?
Nope.
Go back and watch Lindsey Graham's questioning of Kavanaugh.
He specifically asked about civilians being prosecuted by military courts.
Insane google skills. Not everyone has them.
The best Google skills are knowing not to use Google
Bing-o
Duck duck Go , a better choice to thwart the evil of Sundar Pichai .Google used to have : Do no evil " as its corporate motto . That was quietly dropped and now...... here we are .
Sundar Pichai aka the CIA
It was always a ruse to make people trust them more.
I went to the site and in one of the comment the Military Code was cited:
"Rule 502. Qualifications and duties of personnel of courts-martial
(a) Members.
(1) Qualifications. The members detailed to a court-martial shall be those persons who in the opinion of the convening authority are best qualified for the duty by reason of their age, education, training, experience, length of service, and judicial temperament. Each member shall be on active duty with the armed forces and shall be:
(A) A commissioned officer;
(B) A warrant officer, except when the accused is a commissioned officer; or
(C) An enlisted person, except when the accused is either a commissioned or warrant officer.
Again Sidney CANNOT PROSECUTE in a Military Tribunal setting, period."
Could someone with the appropriate expertise say whether and if so how this is incorrect? (I hope it is, but I also believe in research and sauce.)
EDIT: Even if she's not qualified to prosecute before a military tribunal, it may be moot provided she has top-flight military lawyers on her team.
Found this. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/253
I haven’t seen any confirmation of this. It’s larp faggotry until otherwise noted.
Important part: Trump is gonna let it play out before he pulls the trigger, gotta let each state prove it isn't going to protect the rights of its constituents
This
Yep, these hearing and rallies need to happen to sway public opinion so that when Trump pulls the trigger people are ready. We already have some Biden voters being vocal with their regret learning that he supports lockdowns. We just to need to keep building our momentum by individually chipping in where we can.
Give em all the 'rope', false sense of security, and media cover to willingly and intentionally walk into his trap before going scorched earth. This isn't Minority Report and timing is everything.
Timing is everything even in Minority Report.
Remember the scene with the balloons?
Timing is everything, undoubtedly. They must first commit their crimes, felonies, sedition and/or treason before the trap door is sealed shut. I continue to have faith and trust in GEOTUS.
God inspired. I truly believe.
Rightly so.
The Constitution was indeed inspired of God.
Forefathers knew what they were doing.
They literally were some of the smartest people in history, and were inspired by God.
The one benefit I’ve gotten from my leftist university masters program is reading from our founding fathers in the federalist papers, their biographies, and other historical texts. I got a new found appreciation for how genius those patriot mother fuckers are. God bless them.
With that being said, they knew damn well the potential of corruption that could face the nation in hundreds of years after they were gone. They knew the history that played out before them. They wanted our country to last through trials and tribulations.
Your nation should apply for statehood ;)
In January of 2020 he used the Constitution as a shield to defend himself.
Now he must use it as a Sword to defend his country and it's people.
Then he should use it to restore our second amendment rights.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: my dream is for Trump to initiate a second Reconstruction period that targets our major cities. Our cities have so much potential that is fizzled out by corrupt Democrat patronage machines and their unions and pensions. I don't expect it to happen, but my Lord would it be a spectacle.
From white flight to blight flight.
I’m in.
Restore our cities.
Cool! It'd be a crazy undertaking. There are some commonalities but also some uniqueness to each city. But the pensions and unions are a solid place to start.
Once again, Republicans have to fix what DemoKKKrats messed up.
I'm bout tired of that now.
Time to end all traces of the DemoKKKrat mind virus.
Notice what the Trump legal team's suits talk about. Certain voters (any part or class of people) not being treated fairly (deprived of a privilege). Ie: certain precincts were allowed to cure ballots while others were not, therefore the voters were not being treated equally.
If Trump is to use the Insurrection Act, I think it will only happen after a major ruling goes in his favor. He could then use that to back him up.
PA lawsuit is headed to SCOTUS as we speak
The US constitution does not tolerate tyrants
The President has extraordinary powers. Some think it is too much. Others have studied history.
Well what if this were Hillary in there with those powers, would you feel the same?
That's why she is not president.
Stacking too much power in the executive is bound to come bite and bite you in the ass. It's only a matter of when, IMO.
As opposed to, say, 9 unelected people who wear funny black robes? Or hundreds of legislators, half of whom are disloyal to our country?
The only SAFE repository of power is the People themselves. But we have learned through history (there's that word again!) that people will naturally invest their power in a single individual, then in a council, then in a parliament, and finally go back to either anarchy for a time or a dictator.
We are naturally prone to give away our most precious birthright for a bowl of pottage. (See: Isaac vs. Esau.)
Our Founding Fathers knew full well how stupid people are, and in order to protect us from ourselves, designed a system whereby, when rights are threatened one way or the other, there is a solution.
And the solution today is investing a whole lot of power in one man who has proven himself worthy to wield such a power.
Julius Caesar is one of the most misunderstood people from history. His error was getting killed. Had he lived, we would celebrate him the same way we celebrate Oliver Cromwell and George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. These men all did similar things. Only AFTER they did what they did, did we try to invent fictions about why what they did was right and lawful and just. These men, however, had only the passion in their heart that even though they knew they were breaking laws and traditions, they were doing it for the right reasons and there truly was no other way.
There is a time for dictatorship, just like there is a time for deliberation and democracy. Anarchy has its place as well. All must be balanced and set at odds with each other, only able to overpower the others when they fight for individual rights. Had CONGRESS been leading the charge in taking on voter fraud, we would be with them. Had the COURTS done it, we would have been for them. As it is, Trump is in position to gain supreme leadership of the American people, at least for a time, for the simple fact that he and he alone stands to protect our rights.
The Founding Fathers were expecting us to get in the exact sort of problem we are in, and are expecting Trump to declare martial law, even summoning up the militia, and putting down the rebellion of those who are threatening and violating our most basic rights. AS HE SHOULD.
If the courts fail, if President Trump fails to do so, we are left with anarchy as the people will do it themselves. No one wants that. But we will gladly choose it over the alternative: SLAVERY.
The constitutional powers given to the president are nowhere near the 2020 president's powers. By now, the president has far too much power (along with the whole government). However I agree with many of your points. There are times in history that call for different kinds of government, different kinds of solutions. I'm glad right now that it's Trump in there because I do trust him. But we are playing with fire if the government isn't majorly stripped down, very soon.
Well said, Pede
She was already in the Whitehouse and was responsible for selling us out to China. We've been in a constant state of emergency since the 70's. The Bush's were even worse with the wars they waged to line the pockets if the military industrial complex. And Obama was worse than any of them with his drones and turning the Federal government into tyrants so ruthless it would make the gestapo blush.
Yeah I agree, before Trump we had at least 3 AWFUL presidents in a row who completely abused their power. That is exactly my argument, the executive is too strong. If you go back to a strict constitutional interpretation, the executive can't do 90% of what they're doing today. There wouldn't be an Obama level of power back in 1800.
It's a legislative issue. Congress passed too many terrible laws. Point is, you're not going to solve anything by tying your hands behind your back while your subordinates steal the country for China.
It's just a big government issue, but to the core it's a fiat money issue. If we were still on the gold standard it would be impossible for the government to fund itself through taxation. They'd have to actually tax the citizens, and there's no way citizens would be able to fund this large of a government. Return to gold standard ='s the government automatically shrinks and loses power.
Exactly right.
If I remember correctly it's what Eisenhower used to justify sending the 101st Airborne to FORCE School integration.
I hate to be that guy, but that is the exact example that Q used 3 years ago when talking about Trump invoking the Insurrection Act and using the military to drain the swamp.
hell yeah, our elections are a corrupt JOKE
my vote doesn't mean shit - FIX IT, by ANY means necessary
(although I do hope the remedies include deporting ALL illegal aliens)
And their anchor-babies as well.
The Right to Vote is Protected!
the 14th amendment was written for times like these
Right on! It’s right there to use! I’ll gladly secure my area!
Hasn't one of Rudy's main arguments been that peoples' right to vote has been deprived by the fraud? Seems to me he's been repeating that point pretty regularly.
This is the way to save America
Hmm. Seems like a big group of us had our constitutional right to vote take from us.
Spot on
Got my interest but seems more like a Tom Clancy novel type plot than reality. Of course not sure Tom Clancy ever wrote about Commies attempting to cheat their way into the White House. Reality stranger than fiction.
Interesting. I’ll have to check it out. Cite some examples if you can. Just seems like a heavy hammer to use that low information citizens wil not understand
I sure would like the 14th A to be used here in CA and all the mainly Demtard controlled states which are purposely crashing their economies using the PLANdemic as a reason. Would love to see Newscum, Piglousy, and Garshitty marched off in handcuffs .
Equal protection under the law. The disenfranchised Trump voters must have their rights protected in all circumstances , by force , if necessary .
Any history buff pede?
What and or why was the amendment amended? Was the intent to insure slavery wasnt practiced again and if it was the amendment allows the government to use the military to enforce the constitution and amendments?
Military government, attorney General, secretary General, surgeon General etc. Military tribunals for the traitors.
Like in GA right now? Enact it, deputize me and I will bring Brian Kemp in within a day
I haven’t found any instances of people being deputized under these circumstances?
Im saying deputies ME because I'm ready to get shit done. LoL. Make it happen
HELL YES WE GOT YOUR BACK LETS GO!
USA USA USA !!!
Shit he could take over every state in the union based on the second amendment alone then.
Don’t forget, Trump extended the state of emergency, extended by Obama, originally declared by G W Bush.
I don't want it to come to that... But I'll support it if needs be.