Yeah I agree, before Trump we had at least 3 AWFUL presidents in a row who completely abused their power. That is exactly my argument, the executive is too strong. If you go back to a strict constitutional interpretation, the executive can't do 90% of what they're doing today. There wouldn't be an Obama level of power back in 1800.
It's a legislative issue. Congress passed too many terrible laws. Point is, you're not going to solve anything by tying your hands behind your back while your subordinates steal the country for China.
It's just a big government issue, but to the core it's a fiat money issue. If we were still on the gold standard it would be impossible for the government to fund itself through taxation. They'd have to actually tax the citizens, and there's no way citizens would be able to fund this large of a government. Return to gold standard ='s the government automatically shrinks and loses power.
Yeah I agree, before Trump we had at least 3 AWFUL presidents in a row who completely abused their power. That is exactly my argument, the executive is too strong. If you go back to a strict constitutional interpretation, the executive can't do 90% of what they're doing today. There wouldn't be an Obama level of power back in 1800.
It's a legislative issue. Congress passed too many terrible laws. Point is, you're not going to solve anything by tying your hands behind your back while your subordinates steal the country for China.
It's just a big government issue, but to the core it's a fiat money issue. If we were still on the gold standard it would be impossible for the government to fund itself through taxation. They'd have to actually tax the citizens, and there's no way citizens would be able to fund this large of a government. Return to gold standard ='s the government automatically shrinks and loses power.
Exactly right.