Hold up - my question is what “devices” they would have confiscated that would still be there 4 years later? It’s either a bs story covering up why they were there or it’s bs accusations to confiscate Trump admin devices to see what they actually know.
Of course that was wishful thinking. Not a lot to go on from the redacted document. A few things that stood out to me were on p.15 a reference to "BLANK's surrender to BOP custody" and p.16 footnote has a possessive name with an apostrophe at the end: "spent on BLANKS' case". Also on p.16 is a case reference to a Feb 25, 2020 case. I don't suspect this would be used as a legal reference for events happening prior to that date.
Hopefully others can fill in some of the blanks.
Hold up - my question is what “devices” they would have confiscated that would still be there 4 years later? It’s either a bs story covering up why they were there or it’s bs accusations to confiscate Trump admin devices to see what they actually know.
Of course that was wishful thinking. Not a lot to go on from the redacted document. A few things that stood out to me were on p.15 a reference to "BLANK's surrender to BOP custody" and p.16 footnote has a possessive name with an apostrophe at the end: "spent on BLANKS' case". Also on p.16 is a case reference to a Feb 25, 2020 case. I don't suspect this would be used as a legal reference for events happening prior to that date. Hopefully others can fill in some of the blanks.