37
Comments (17)
sorted by:
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
TheHandofGodzilla 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hopefully it’s on Clinton pardon of Mark Rich

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TrumpTrollMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

What about the people who are laundering the money?

Think.

The swamp runs deep.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
rn10950 1 point ago +1 / -0

All it said is that somebody tied to buy a pardon. It did not say that the pardon was actually given. For all we know this could have been Joe Biden trying to get a pardon for Hunter.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
RealHunterBidenAMA 0 points ago +1 / -1

Who is it against?

6
MyNewToy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Has to be Obama. If someone near Trump had been raided it would have been live on CNN

3
RealHunterBidenAMA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lmao good point

1
OhTrumpieOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Obama admin? Wouldn’t they have new devices by now 4 years later? I just thought it was a bs way of seizing devices to try to figure out the Trump team’s strategy.

1
MyNewToy 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is just a motion for it to remain under seal or not. It could have been under seal for years

1
OhTrumpieOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

So it was under seal but may have actually happened during the previous admin? Like they didn’t “raid” the White House today?

1
TrumpTrollMaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who do you think?

2
RealHunterBidenAMA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Somebody who has the power to grant pardons and is in the White House?

2
TrumpTrollMaster [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can't possibly be this dense.

2
TrumpTrollMaster [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who was LAST in the White House?