Ok guys. ELI5 and be patient with me please. But I thought Section 230 was in some ways a good thing in that at it's base it was implemented to protect platforms like us td.win? It's only the fact that loopholes in the policy were being exploited by big tech to censor us. My assumption is that GEOTUS knows this and taken an extreme stance in the hopes of having those loopholes closed. But if pressed and the veto happens couldn't this end up backfiring for us in the end?
The concern I'm getting at is the elimination of Section 230 would remove protection from all platforms. And unfortunately for us the left has a bigger warchest for lawfare and the backing of government to lay siege against patriotic platforms like ours.
Ok guys. ELI5 and be patient with me please. But I thought Section 230 was in some ways a good thing in that at it's base it was implemented to protect platforms like us td.win? It's only the fact that loopholes in the policy were being exploited by big tech to censor us. My assumption is that GEOTUS knows this and taken an extreme stance in the hopes of having those loopholes closed. But if pressed and the veto happens couldn't this end up backfiring for us in the end?
The concern I'm getting at is the elimination of Section 230 would remove protection from all platforms. And unfortunately for us the left has a bigger warchest for lawfare and the backing of government to lay siege against patriotic platforms like ours.