No, they're Denethor from The Return of the King. All they do is spread pessimism and defeatism while hiding behind the excuse of "I'm a realist." A bunch of them today were publicly making threads gloating that "See? You Qanon fags were wrong!" I'm not even a Qanon follower and I found it disgusting.
Yeah, I noticed that anti-Q are even worse than Q folks. I disagree with Q on most things, but they can believe in whatever they want. Anti-Q folks reminds me of how leftists treated us. I find it kinda funny because I don’t see pro-Q posts everywhere, but I see anti-Q posts everywhere.
I think Q people are widely varied from “trust the plan” 4-D chess optimism, all the way to “all the bad actors have already been secretly eliminated and all their new videos are holograms or clones.” The latter, I strongly disagree with of course, but the media liked to go after the craziest claims from the fringe part of the Q community and blast those out on television for Trump to disavow and rattle part of his base. That way, when he leaves Q followers alone, or defends them at all, the media can then paint all the craziest shit on him.
Did the whole 4-D chess thing even start with Q? I’ve been on TD since 2015, and I remember a whole lot of ‘Trump is a 4-D chess master’ and ‘Trust Trump’, but I don’t remember any Q until after the election.
I firmly place myself in the ‘Trump is a 4-D chess master’ camp, just because he’s proven himself to be repeatedly over the last 5 years, but I just kind of ignore Q. There are some interesting things about it, but I put about as much stock in it as I would any other pede’s opinion post.
I should probably clarify—yes, you are correct that the ‘4-D chess’ rhetoric was around well before Q, which began in late October 2017. I guess what I really meant by that point was when Q referred (only once to my recollection) to Project Looking Glass. There are a lot of ‘sci-fi’ implications people read into that reference, indicating that the Trump team were either made capable of understanding future events by means of statistical ‘chance’ of certain actions having X% toward various effects—all the way to people believing the “Trump is a time traveler” meme, literally.
Those same people are also MAGA and Trump supporters so why conflate individuals having fun speculating about what's happening with Q rather than Trump who the media refers to as the Conspiracy Theorist in Chief? Why fall for such sophomoric media smear tactics instead of wondering why, next to Trump himself, Q has inspired such global, co ordinated, unrelenting and increasingly unhinged attacks. Why indeed.
The Anti-Q stuff is definitely worse than the Q stuff. The Q people seem to have confirmation bias, overactive pattern-matching, and optimism, at worst. The Anti-Q people basically say that Q is a dangerous cult that's going to get people killed, and that even being disinterested about them is tantamount to collaborating with terrorists. Which is fuckin nuts. A heck of a lot more damaging to politics than Q itself could ever be.
How odd that you turn millions of anonymous unique individuals
from around the world into a collective "Q people" then start psycho analyzing your creation as if its real. Do you do the same with MAGA people too? If so, why? Why opine about what you haven't personally researched via primary sourced data ie the almost 5,000 drops over more than three years? General Flynn has. So I have I. Btw do you follow Scott Adams? Anyway, Peace.
Out of almost 5,000 posts over three plus years, you disagree with most of them? Odd. Questions, links to open source files, photos, video clips etc. What's to disagree with? If you meant the format isn't a match for you I can understand that. It definitely is geared to the chan communities which thrive on mental engagement although it expanded to be accessible to reddit refugees and other normies too. To each his own but what's there to disagree with when its just a matter of personal preference?
No, they're Denethor from The Return of the King. All they do is spread pessimism and defeatism while hiding behind the excuse of "I'm a realist." A bunch of them today were publicly making threads gloating that "See? You Qanon fags were wrong!" I'm not even a Qanon follower and I found it disgusting.
Yeah, I noticed that anti-Q are even worse than Q folks. I disagree with Q on most things, but they can believe in whatever they want. Anti-Q folks reminds me of how leftists treated us. I find it kinda funny because I don’t see pro-Q posts everywhere, but I see anti-Q posts everywhere.
I love all the differing viewpoints and try to see things from everybody's perspective.
Doomers are fine as long as they lurk rather than post. Posting turns them into Energy Vampires.
I think Q people are widely varied from “trust the plan” 4-D chess optimism, all the way to “all the bad actors have already been secretly eliminated and all their new videos are holograms or clones.” The latter, I strongly disagree with of course, but the media liked to go after the craziest claims from the fringe part of the Q community and blast those out on television for Trump to disavow and rattle part of his base. That way, when he leaves Q followers alone, or defends them at all, the media can then paint all the craziest shit on him.
Did the whole 4-D chess thing even start with Q? I’ve been on TD since 2015, and I remember a whole lot of ‘Trump is a 4-D chess master’ and ‘Trust Trump’, but I don’t remember any Q until after the election.
I firmly place myself in the ‘Trump is a 4-D chess master’ camp, just because he’s proven himself to be repeatedly over the last 5 years, but I just kind of ignore Q. There are some interesting things about it, but I put about as much stock in it as I would any other pede’s opinion post.
I should probably clarify—yes, you are correct that the ‘4-D chess’ rhetoric was around well before Q, which began in late October 2017. I guess what I really meant by that point was when Q referred (only once to my recollection) to Project Looking Glass. There are a lot of ‘sci-fi’ implications people read into that reference, indicating that the Trump team were either made capable of understanding future events by means of statistical ‘chance’ of certain actions having X% toward various effects—all the way to people believing the “Trump is a time traveler” meme, literally.
Q existed in the 60s. Whatever / whoever it is, it can't be one individual.
Those same people are also MAGA and Trump supporters so why conflate individuals having fun speculating about what's happening with Q rather than Trump who the media refers to as the Conspiracy Theorist in Chief? Why fall for such sophomoric media smear tactics instead of wondering why, next to Trump himself, Q has inspired such global, co ordinated, unrelenting and increasingly unhinged attacks. Why indeed.
The Anti-Q stuff is definitely worse than the Q stuff. The Q people seem to have confirmation bias, overactive pattern-matching, and optimism, at worst. The Anti-Q people basically say that Q is a dangerous cult that's going to get people killed, and that even being disinterested about them is tantamount to collaborating with terrorists. Which is fuckin nuts. A heck of a lot more damaging to politics than Q itself could ever be.
How odd that you turn millions of anonymous unique individuals from around the world into a collective "Q people" then start psycho analyzing your creation as if its real. Do you do the same with MAGA people too? If so, why? Why opine about what you haven't personally researched via primary sourced data ie the almost 5,000 drops over more than three years? General Flynn has. So I have I. Btw do you follow Scott Adams? Anyway, Peace.
Out of almost 5,000 posts over three plus years, you disagree with most of them? Odd. Questions, links to open source files, photos, video clips etc. What's to disagree with? If you meant the format isn't a match for you I can understand that. It definitely is geared to the chan communities which thrive on mental engagement although it expanded to be accessible to reddit refugees and other normies too. To each his own but what's there to disagree with when its just a matter of personal preference?
They’re that red-headed kid on The Magic Schoolbus that is always whining. Hey, Trump’s like Miss Frizz!
This is funny.
Get our professional Meme Battalion on this!
Miss Frizz always wins, through thick and thin, just like GEOTUS!