8640
Holy Shit (twitter.com)
posted ago by Djpele12 ago by Djpele12 +8643 / -3
Comments (880)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
67
NihilistCaregiver 67 points ago +80 / -13

4 years too late

59
Gesirisi 59 points ago +65 / -6

4 years ago, many millions of people wouldn't have seen the problem as they do now. The problem has been exposed big time..

38
deleted 38 points ago +42 / -4
26
Sagan 26 points ago +28 / -2

You need the public support, right now the public will agree 100%

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not 100%. But maybe 75% or more

8
Acceptdecline 8 points ago +9 / -1

Gotta build a strong case for the argument I suppose

1
kazimiera 1 point ago +1 / -0

The case has been built. I was angry being CENSORED, my right to free speech SILENCED. Didn't know about the 230 thing. Now I'm more aware.

8
FluhanWu 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is a good point. That was used on Gadaffi. “he went against twitter” he didn’t have 80+ million to protect him.

5
MAGAMAN4EVA 5 points ago +5 / -0

4 years ago this site was on Reddit. Imagine trying that now.

7
BeardedNinjaPede 7 points ago +9 / -2

That's why we have elected representatives. They're supposed to look into things like the actual effect of laws they pass and correct problems with them. Every citizen is not required to be an activist expert in every single matter in a republic, ideally. The POTUS should not be the one effectively making law. Legislatures should because of separation of powers. Our representatives have failed us miserably for many decades.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Muh you have to pass it to know what it says

2
RebirthOfTheRepublic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea but if the president made that move they would have focused on it and saw. Years ago. And maybe we would have gotten it done before the election. Giving us the ability to shine so much light on their plots. That they couldnt have done it.

But now its pointless. Either he wont be president to actually do it or it will be after the war. In which case those who would act against the interests of the American people would already be locked up or laid down.

0
DWEPHCNPCS2020 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's not pointless at all. If they all did not commit the crimes that will be exposed, how would the swamp ever be drained? Think about it. Crimes had to come first.

1
RebirthOfTheRepublic 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe there was plenty of evidence of them violating section 230 going back years.

My comment about it being pointless was in reference to it being done now. A month before we either go to war, trump is declared the winner, or he decides to accept it.

In all 3 of those scenarios doing it now is kind of pointless. Like I said if he concedes biden will throw it away day 1. If we war then they dont make it far enough to go to court. And if he wins, we can deal with it after we quell the insurgents.

1
Cozette 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lmao if you seriously imagine you know enough to critique Trumps timing, tactics or strategy. Do you also imagine this marks the beginning of Trumps Big Tech takedown rather than the final phase? You could learn so much if you recognized how much our VSG is offering. For free. God bless those with questions rather than opinions; including me!!!