Section 230 needs to be clarified, I have no problem with an Internet Service Provider having 'immunity' for providing a service that is open to everyone. When groups like Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube choose to suppress some content (i.e. Breitbart, InfoWars) and promote others (i.e. CNN) they're clearly acting as publishers and should not have legal protections for their content.
Section 230 needs to be clarified, I have no problem with an Internet Service Provider having 'immunity' for providing a service that is open to everyone. When groups like Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube choose to suppress some content (i.e. Breitbart, InfoWars) and promote others (i.e. CNN) they're clearly acting as publishers and should not have legal protections for their content.
Are we acting as publishers here on this site when we deport commie shills?
No more Immunity.